Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites







Biol Psychiatry. 2001 Nov 15;50(10):775-82.
Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations in nursing infants and breast milk.

Hendrick V, Stowe ZN, Altshuler LL, Mintz J, Hwang S, Hostetter A, Suri R, Leight K, Fukuchi A.

UCLA Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, Los Angeles, California 90095, USA.

BACKGROUND: This study's goal was to characterize nursing infants' exposure to fluoxetine through breast milk and to identify variables for minimizing such exposure. METHODS: Nursing women on stable daily doses of fluoxetine were recruited into the study. Breast milk, maternal and infant serum concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine were determined with high-performance liquid chromatography. RESULTS: Nineteen nursing women one with a pair of dizygotic twins participated in the study. The women were on stable daily doses of fluoxetine (10-60 mg/day) and all but two took the medication during the last trimester of pregnancy. Fluoxetine was detectable in 30% (n = 6) of the nursing infant sera (< 1-84 ng/mL), whereas norfluoxetine was found in 85% (N = 17) (< 1-265 ng/mL). Peak breast milk concentrations occurred approximately 8 hours after maternal dosing and predicted norfluoxetine concentrations in infant serum. Maternal serum fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations correlated highly with infant norfluoxetine concentrations. A daily maternal fluoxetine dosage of 20 mg or lower was significantly less likely to produce detectable concentrations of either fluoxetine or norfluoxetine in infants compared to higher daily dosages. No adverse effects were reported in any infant. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate that maternal serum and peak breast milk concentrations of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine predict nursing infant serum norfluoxetine concentrations. In nursing women taking 20 mg/day or less of fluoxetine, infant serum concentrations were typically low.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11720696&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2001 Jan;22(1):85-90.
Effects of CYP2C19 genotype and CYP2C9 on fluoxetine N-demethylation in human liver microsomes.

Liu ZQ, Shu Y, Huang SL, Wang LS, He N, Zhou HH.

Pharmacogenetics Research Institute, Hunan Medical University, Changsha 410078, China.

AIM: The present study was designed to define the kinetic behavior of fluoxetine N-demethylation in human liver microsomes and to identify the isoforms of cytochrome P-450 (CYP) involved in this metabolic pathway. METHODS: The kinetics of Ne formation of norfluoxetine was determined in human liver microsomes from six genotyped CYP2C19 extensive metabolizers (EM). The correlation studies between the fluoxetine N-demethylase activity and various CYP enzyme activities were performed. Selective inhibitors or chemical probes of various cytochrome P-450 isoforms were also employed. RESULTS: The kinetics of norfluoxetine formation in all liver microsomes were fitted by a single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten equation (mean Km=32 micromol/L+/-7 micromol/L). Significant correlations were found between N-demethylation of fluoxetine at both 25 micromol/L and 100 micromol/L and 3-hydroxylation of tolbutamide at 250 micromol/L (r1=0.821, P1=0.001; r2=0.668, P2=0.013), respectively, and S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylase activity (r=0.717, P=0.006) at high substrate concentration of 100 micromol/L. S-mephenytoin (SMP) (a CYP2C19 substrate) at high concentration and sulfaphenazole (SUL) (a selective inhibitor of CYP2C9) substantially inhibited norfluoxetine formation. The reaction was minimally inhibited by coincubation with chemical probe, inhibitor of CYP3A4 (triacetyloleandomycin, TAO). The inhibition of fluoxetine N-demethylation at high substrate concentration (100 micromol/L) was greater in PM livers than in EM livers (73 % vs 45 %, P < 0.01) when the microsomes were precoincubated with SUL plus TAO. CONCLUSION: Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9 is likely to be a major CYP isoform catalyzing fluoxetine N-demethylation in human liver microsomes at a sub




J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2002 Jan;300(1):105-11.
O-Dealkylation of fluoxetine in relation to CYP2C19 gene dose and involvement of CYP3A4 in human liver microsomes.

Liu ZQ, Zhu B, Tan YF, Tan ZR, Wang LS, Huang SL, Shu Y, Zhou HH.

Pharmacogenetics Research Institute, Xiang-Ya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, People's Republic of China.

This work evaluated the kinetic behavior of fluoxetine O-dealkylation in human liver microsomes from different CYP2C19 genotypes and identified the isoenzymes of cytochrome P450 involved in this metabolic pathway. The kinetics of the rho-trifluoromethylphenol (TFMP) formation from fluoxetine was determined in human liver microsomes from three homozygous (wt/wt) and three heterozygous (wt/m1) extensive metabolizers (EMs) and three poor metabolizers (PMs) with m1 mutation (m1/m1) with respect to CYP2C19. The formation rate of TFMP was determined by gas chromatograph with electron-capture detection. The kinetics of TFMP formation was best described by the two-enzyme and single-enzyme Michaelis-Menten equation for liver microsomes from CYP2C19 EMs and PMs, respectively. The mean intrinsic clearance (V(max)/K(m)) for the high- and low-affinity component was 25.2 microl/min/nmol and 3.8 microl/min/nmol of cytochrome P450 in the homozygous EMs microsomes and 12.8 microl/min/nmol and 2.9 microl/min/nmol of cytochrome P450 in the heterozygous EMs microsomes, respectively. Omeprazole (a CYP2C19 substrate) at a high concentration and triacetyloleandomycin (a selective inhibitor of CYP3A4) substantially inhibited O-dealkylation of fluoxetine. Furthermore, fluoxetine O-dealkylation was correlated significantly with S-mephenytoin 4'-hydroxylation at a low substrate concentration and midazolam 1'-hydroxylation at a high substrate concentration in liver microsomes of 11 Chinese individuals, respectively. Moreover, there were obvious differences in the O-dealkylation of fluoxetine in liver microsomes from different CYP2C19 genotypes and in microsomal fract

bugs.invest.uv.mx

The administration of a relatively high dose of antidepressant drugs produces an increased neuronal firing rate of the lateral septal nucleus (LSN) in the rat and a decreased immobility in rats forced to swim. However, it is unknown whether a minimally effective low-dose 21-day treatment with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, while reducing immobility in the forced swim test, also increases the neuronal firing rate of the LSN in Wistar rats. The total time of immobility decreased with a daily injection of 0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg of fluoxetine (p < 0.001), and the lowest dose increasing the latency to the first immobility period (p < 0.0001) was 1.0 mg/kg. Therefore, the action of the 21-day fluoxetine treatment (1.0 mg/kg) on the firing rate of LSN neurones was tested in another group of rats. A total amount of 78 single-unit extracellular recordings was taken from the LSN of eight control rats (n = 40) and eight fluoxetine treated rats (n = 38). The LSN firing rate in the fluoxetine group was double (18.3 +/- 2.5 spikes per 10 s, p < 0.05) that in the control group (7.0 +/- 0.9 spikes per 10 s), and the first order interval of firing proved to be significantly lower in the fluoxetine group compared to the control group (384.3 +/- 22.3 and 639.7 +/- 27.5 ms, respectively; p < 0.05). In conclusion, the increased neuronal tiring rate of the LSN in the animals treated with a low dose of fluoxetine may be associated with an increased motivation to escape from the stressful situation that the forced swim represents.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11769815&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Neuropsychopharmacology. 2001 Jan;24(1):11-20.
Desensitization of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors by a low chronic fluoxetine dose effect of the concurrent administration of WAY-100635.

Hervas I, Vilaro MT, Romero L, Scorza MC, Mengod G, Artigas F.

Department of Neurochemistry, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomedicas de Barcelona CSIC, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.

Using microdialysis, receptor autoradiography and in situ hybridization, we examined the effects of fluoxetine alone or with WAY-100635 on: (a) extracellular 5-HT in frontal cortex; and (b) density and sensitivity of 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors in rat brain. WAY-100635 (0.3 mg/kg, s.c.) doubled the increase in extracellular 5-HT produced by fluoxetine (3 mg/kg, i.p.) in frontal cortex. Two-week minipump treatments with these daily doses significantly raised extracellular 5-HT to 275 +/- 33% (fluoxetine) and 245 +/- 10% (fluoxetine plus WAY-100635) of controls. Fluoxetine 3 mg/kg.day desensitized dorsal raphe 5-HT(1A) autoreceptors, an effect prevented by the concurrent WAY-100635 administration. However, WAY-100635 (alone or with fluoxetine) did not change 5-HT(1A) autoreceptor sensitivity. The density of 5-HT(1A) receptors and its encoding mRNA, was unaffected by these treatments. These results suggest that prolonged blockade of 5-HT(1A) receptors in vivo prevents the autoreceptor desensitization induced by fluoxetine but does not result in receptor sensitization.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11106871&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2000 Sep-Oct;14(5):443-51.
Fluoxetine-induced pressor response in freely moving rats: a role for vasopressin and sympathetic tone.

Lazartigues E, Brefel-Courbon C, Bagheri H, Costes S, Gharib C, Tran MA, Senard JM, Montastruc JL.

Laboratoire de Pharmacologie Medicale et Clinique, Inserm U317 and Centre Midi-Pyrenees de Pharmacovigilance, de Pharmacoepidemiologie et d'Informations sur le Medicament, Faculte de Medecine, Toulouse, France.

The present study was performed in order to assess, in freely moving rats, the cardiovascular effects of central administration of fluoxetine, a serotonin reuptake inhibitor. Two kinds of experiments were performed: 1) acute central administration of fluoxetine. and 2) chronic intraperitoneal administration of fluoxetine plus selegiline, a monoamine oxidase B inhibitor. Intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) administration of fluoxetine (5-50 microg) induced an increase in blood pressure. This fluoxetine-induced pressor response reached its maximal 1 hour after injection without any significant change in heart rate. At the dose of 10 microg i.c.v., fluoxetine significantly increased mean blood pressure by 16 +/- 4 mmHg. This pressor response was reduced by an intravenous (i.v.) pretreatment with the alpha1-adrenoceptor antagonist, prazosin (500 microg kg(-1)) (+ 7 +/- 4 mmHg, P <0.05) or with the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist (20 microg kg(-1)) (+5 +/- 3 mmHg, P < 0.05). The pressor response was completely abolished by a concomitant pretreatment with prazosin plus the V1A-vasopressin receptor antagonist. Pretreatment with the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, propranolol (1 mg kg(-1) i.v.), or the 5-HT2 receptor antagonist, ketanserine (5 mg kg(-1) i.v.), did not modify the fluoxetine-induced pressor response. In freely moving rats receiving fluoxetine (10 microg i.c.v.), vasopressin plasma levels were significantly higher (39 +/- 5 pg mL(-1) than in rats receiving 10 microL i.c.v. saline (14 +/- 4 pg mL(-1)). A 30 day intraperitoneal (i.p.) a




Br J Pharmacol. 1999 Jun;127(3):740-6.
Serotonin reuptake inhibitor, fluoxetine, dilates isolated skeletal muscle arterioles. Possible role of altered Ca2+ sensitivity.

Pacher P, Ungvari Z, Kecskemeti V, Koller A.

Department of Pharmacology, Semmelweis University of Medicine, Budapest, Hungary.

1. Inhibitors of serotonin reuptake in the central nervous system, such as fluoxetine, may also affect the function of vascular tissues. Thus, we investigated the effect of fluoxetine on the vasomotor responses of isolated, pressurized arterioles of rat gracilis muscle (98 +/- 4 microns in diameter at 80 mmHg perfusion pressure). 2. We have found that increasing concentrations of fluoxetine dilated arterioles up to 155 +/- 5 microns with an EC50 of 2.5 +/- 0.5 x 10(-6) M. 3. Removal of the endothelium, application of 4-aminopyridine (4-AP, an inhibitor of aminopyridine sensitive K+ channels), or use of glibenclamide (an inhibitor of ATP-sensitive K+ channels) did not affect the vasodilator response to fluoxetine. 4. In the presence of 10(-6), 2 x 10(-6) or 10(-5) M fluoxetine noradrenaline (NA, 10(-9)-10(-5) M) and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, 10(-9)-10(-5)M)-induced constrictions were significantly attenuated resulting in concentration-dependent parallel rightward shifts of their dose-response curves (pA2 = 6.1 +/- 0.1 and 6.9 +/- 0.1, respectively). 5. Increasing concentrations of Ca2+ (10(-4) 3 x 10(-2) M) elicited arteriolar constrictions (up to approximately 30%), which were markedly reduced by 2 x 10(-6)M fluoxetine, whereas 10(-5)M fluoxetine practically abolished these responses. 6. In conclusion, fluoxetine, elicits substantial dilations of isolated skeletal muscle arterioles, a response which is not mediated by 4-AP- and ATP-sensitive K+ channels or endothelium-derived dilator factors. The findings that fluoxetine had a greater inhibitory effect on Ca2+ elicited constrictions than on responses to NA and 5-HT suggest that fluoxetine may inhibit Ca2+ channel(s) or interfere with the signal tra




Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Sep 1;146(1):19-23.
Fluoxetine blocks expression but not development of sensitization to morphine-induced oral stereotypy in rats.

Wennemer HK, Kornetsky C.

Department of Pharmacology, University of New England, 11 Hills Beach Road, Biddeford, ME 04005, USA.

RATIONALE: Repeated high doses of morphine in the rat cause stereotypic gnawing behavior that can be re-expressed by a low dose of morphine weeks and even months after the initial treatment. The determination of the role of serotonin in this sensitized morphine-induced behavior has both empirical and theoretical relevance. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the serotonin-reuptake blocker fluoxetine will block the development and/or the expression of this opiate-induced stereotypy. METHODS: Rats were given four 10-mg/kg injections of morphine alone or with 5.0 mg/kg fluoxetine over a 36-h period. At weekly intervals for 6 weeks after the last of the sensitizing morphine doses, all rats were challenged with 4.0 mg/kg morphine. At week 2 and week 4, however, the morphine was co-administered with fluoxetine. RESULTS: Fluoxetine completely blocked the expression of the morphine-induced stereotypy; however, when the morphine/fluoxetine-treated rats were challenged with morphine alone, they expressed similar degrees of stereotypy as the rats that initially only received morphine. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that increasing synaptic serotonin will block the expression but not the development of sensitization to the oral stereotypic effects of repeated high doses of morphine. Also, despite the complete blocking of the morphine effect by fluoxetine during the sensitization phase, the presence of significant biting by these rats during the challenge with morphine alone argues that conditioning factors are not a necessary component for the morphine sensitization to develop.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10485960&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




J Membr Biol. 1999 Sep 1;171(1):75-85.
Fluoxetine inhibits K(+) transport pathways (K(+) efflux, Na(+)-K(+)-2Cl(-) cotransport, and Na(+) pump) underlying volume regulation in corneal endothelial cells.

Hara E, Reinach PS, Wen Q, Iserovich P, Fischbarg J.

Department of Ophthalmology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.

We have studied regulatory volume responses of cultured bovine corneal endothelial cells (CBCEC) using light scattering. We assessed the contributions of fluoxetine (Prozac) and bumetanide-sensitive membrane ion transport pathways to such responses by determining K(+) efflux and influx. Cells swollen by a 20% hypo-osmotic solution underwent a regulatory volume decrease (RVD) response, which after 6 min restored relative cell volume by 98%. Fluoxetine inhibited RVD recovery; 20 microM by 26%, and 50 microM totally. Fluoxetine had a triphasic effect on K(+) efflux; from 20 to 100 microM it inhibited efflux 2-fold, whereas at higher concentrations the efflux first increased to 1.5-fold above the control value, and then decreased again. Cells shrunk by a 20% hyperosmotic solution underwent a regulatory volume increase (RVI) which also after 6 min restored the cell volume by 99%. Fluoxetine inhibited RVI; 20 microM by 25%, and 50 microM completely. Bumetanide (1 microM) inhibited RVI by 43%. In a Cl(-)-free medium, fluoxetine (50-500 microM) progressively inhibited bumetanide-insensitive K(+) influx. The inhibitions of RVI and K(+) influx induced by fluoxetine 20 to 50 microM were similar to those induced by 1 microM bumetanide and by Cl(-)-free medium. A computer simulation suggests that fluoxetine can interact with the selectivity filter of K(+) channels. The data suggest that CBCEC can mediate RVD and RVI in part through increases in K(+) efflux and Na-K-2Cl cotransport (NKCC) activity. Interestingly, the data also suggest that fluoxetine at 20 to 50 microM inhibits NKCC, and at 100-1000 microM inhibits the Na(+) pump. One possib







Fluoxetine Online References

Fluoxetine Online References 1 | Fluoxetine Online References 2 | Fluoxetine Online References 3 | Fluoxetine Online References 4 | Fluoxetine Online References 5 | Fluoxetine Online References 6 | Fluoxetine Online References 7 | Fluoxetine Online References 8 | Fluoxetine Online References 9 | Fluoxetine Online References 10 | Fluoxetine Online References 11 | Fluoxetine Online References 12 | Fluoxetine Online References 13 | Fluoxetine Online References 14 | Fluoxetine Online References 15 | Fluoxetine Online References 16 | Fluoxetine Online References 17 | Fluoxetine Online References 18 | Fluoxetine Online References 19 | Fluoxetine Online References 20 | Fluoxetine Online References 21 | Fluoxetine Online References 22 | Fluoxetine Online References 23 | Fluoxetine Online References 24 | Fluoxetine Online References 25 | Fluoxetine Online References 26 | Fluoxetine Online References 27 | Fluoxetine Online References 28 | Fluoxetine Online References 29 | Fluoxetine Online References 30 | Fluoxetine Online References 31 | Fluoxetine Online References 32 | Fluoxetine Online References 33 | Fluoxetine Online References 34 | Fluoxetine Online References 35 | Fluoxetine Online References 36 | Fluoxetine Online References 37 | Fluoxetine Online References 38 | Fluoxetine Online References 39 | Fluoxetine Online References 40 | Fluoxetine Online References 41 | Fluoxetine Online References 42 | Fluoxetine Online References 43 | Fluoxetine Online References 44