Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites







J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2003 Aug;306(2):563-71. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
Chronic fluoxetine differentially affects 5-hydroxytryptamine (2A) receptor signaling in frontal cortex, oxytocin- and corticotropin-releasing factor-containing neurons in rat paraventricular nucleus.

Damjanoska KJ, Van de Kar LD, Kindel GH, Zhang Y, D'Souza DN, Garcia F, Battaglia G, Muma NA.

Department of Pharmacology, Loyola University Chicago, Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL 60153, USA.

Differential adaptive changes in serotonin2A [5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)2A] receptor signaling during treatment may be one mechanism involved in the latency of therapeutic improvement with antidepressants, such as fluoxetine. We examined the effects of fluoxetine (2, 3, 7, 21, or 42 days) on hypothalamic 5-HT2A receptor signaling. The hormone responses to an injection of the 5-HT2A receptor agonist (+/-)-1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-amino-propane HCl (DOI) were used as an index of hypothalamic 5-HT2A receptor function. Treatment with fluoxetine for 21 or 42 days produced diminished adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) and oxytocin (but not corticosterone) responses to DOI injections (2.5 mg/kg i.p.; 15 min postinjection). Regulators of G protein signaling 4 and Galphaq protein levels in the hypothalamic paraventricular nucleus were not altered during fluoxetine treatment. Because previous studies indicate that treatment with fluoxetine for 21 days resulted in increased hormone responses to DOI when measured at 30 min after injection, we examined the effect of fluoxetine (21 days) on DOI-induced increase hormone levels at 15, 30, and 60 min after DOI injection. Fluoxetine decreased the oxytocin response at 15 but not at 30 min post-DOI injection, and potentiated the ACTH and corticosterone responses at 30 min post-DOI injection. For comparison, we examined the effect of fluoxetine on 5-HT2A receptor-mediated increase in phospholipase C (PLC) activity in the frontal cortex. 5-HT-stimulated, but not guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate-stimulated PLC activity




Neuropharmacology. 2003 Jun;44(7):903-10.
Bi-phasic change in BDNF gene expression following antidepressant drug treatment.

Coppell AL, Pei Q, Zetterstrom TS.

University Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

The gene for brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has recently received attention in relation to the therapeutic action of antidepressant treatment. This study aimed to clarify the influence of post drug interval on the effect of acute and repeated treatment with antidepressant drugs on BDNF gene expression in the rat brain. It was found that repeated administration of either the monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine (TCP) or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) re-uptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline), evoke a bi-phasic and time-dependent effect on BDNF gene expression in the rat hippocampus (especially dentate gyrus). A down-regulation of the BDNF gene was detected at 4 h (TCP and fluoxetine) and an up-regulation at 24 h (TCP, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline) after the last of twice daily injections for 14 days. After a single injection the down-regulation was detected at 4 h (TCP, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline) but BDNF mRNA levels were not altered at 24 h post drug (TCP, fluoxetine and paroxetine). Administration of inhibitors of noradrenaline re-uptake (desipramine and maprotiline) or the atypical antidepressant mianserin had no effect on BDNF mRNA levels at either single (4 h post drug, desipramine) or repeated (24 h post drug, desipramine, maprotiline, mianserin) treatment. The gene expression for NT-3, which is distributed in a high density in the dentate gyrus, was not affected by single or repeated injections of antidepressant drugs (TCP, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, desipramine, maprotiline or mianserin) at 4 or 24 h post drug. In conclusion, these data show that the effect of antidepressant drugs on BDNF gene expression may be more complex and less widespread across treatments t

ucla.edu

OBJECTIVE: This study determined the placental transfer of antidepressants and their metabolites. METHOD: A total of 38 pregnant women taking citalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, or sertraline participated. Maternal and umbilical cord blood samples were obtained to determine antidepressant and metabolite concentrations. RESULTS: Antidepressant and metabolite concentrations were detectable in 86.8% of umbilical cord samples. The mean ratios of umbilical cord to maternal serum concentrations ranged from 0.29 to 0.89. The lowest ratios were for sertraline and paroxetine; the highest were for citalopram and fluoxetine. Maternal doses of sertraline and fluoxetine correlated with umbilical cord concentrations of these medications. CONCLUSIONS: Umbilical cord concentrations of antidepressants and their metabolites were almost invariably lower than corresponding maternal concentrations. Maternal doses predicted umbilical concentrations of fluoxetine and sertraline. Mean umbilical cord to maternal serum ratios were significantly lower for sertraline than fluoxetine, suggesting that sertraline may produce less fetal medication exposure than fluoxetine near delivery.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12727706&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Brain Res. 2003 May 30;973(2):151-60.
Differential acute effects of fluoxetine on frontal and auditory cortex networks in vitro.

Xia Y, Gopal KV, Gross GW.

Department of Biological Sciences, P.O. Box 305220, University of North Texas, Denton, TX 76203, USA.

Primary cultures of neuronal networks grown on microelectrode arrays were used to quantify acute effects of fluoxetine (Prozac) on spontaneous spike and burst activity. For frontal cortex cultures, fluoxetine showed consistent inhibitory effects and terminated activity at 10-16 microM. IC(50) mean+/-S.E. for spike rates was 5.4+/-0.7 microM (n=15). For auditory cortex cultures, fluoxetine caused excitation at 1-10 microM, initial inhibition at 15 microM, and activity cessation at 20-25 microM. The spike rate IC(50) was 15.9+/-1.0 microM (n=11). Fluoxetine did not change the action potential waveform shape. However, at high concentrations, it caused total cessation of spike activity on all channels. The inhibition caused by fluoxetine was reversible for both tissues. Based on the results, we conclude that cultures showed repeatable, concentration-dependent sensitivities to fluoxetine but demonstrated tissue-specific responses for frontal and auditory cortex networks. These responses may not be due to the interference with serotonin reuptake, but may be due to a secondary effect on ionic channels.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12738058&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Neuropsychobiology. 2003;47(3):137-40.
Association analysis for neuronal nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphism with major depression and fluoxetine response.

Yu YW, Chen TJ, Wang YC, Liou YJ, Hong CJ, Tsai SJ.

Yu's Psychiatric Clinic, Kaohsiung, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC.

Nitric oxide (NO) is produced from its precursor L-arginine by the enzyme NO synthase (NOS), which includes at least three distinct isoforms - neuronal (nNOS), endothelial, and inducible NOS. Recent studies have implicated NOS in the mechanism that underlies the therapeutic efficacy of antidepressant medication. In addition, major depressive disorder (MDD) patients were found to have significantly higher plasma nitrate concentrations than normal subjects, an index of NO production, in comparison to normal subjects. In a population-based association study, we tested the hypothesis that the nNOS C276T polymorphism confers susceptibility to MDD. We also examined the association between this polymorphism and therapeutic fluoxetine response in 114 MDD patients who underwent a 4-week fluoxetine treatment. The results demonstrate that the nNOS variants are found at similar frequencies in MDD patients and healthy control subjects. Further, we did not discover any genetic variants that influenced the fluoxetine response in MDD patients treated with fluoxetine. Our findings suggest that this nNOS C276T polymorphism does not play a major role in the susceptibility to, or fluoxetine response in, MDD. However, the association between other NOS variants and MDD or antidepressant response, including sexual dysfunction, may warrant further investigation. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12759556&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Int J Psychiatry Med. 2002;32(4):337-44.
Fluoxetine's effects on cognitive performance in patients with traumatic brain injury.

Horsfield SA, Rosse RB, Tomasino V, Schwartz BL, Mastropaolo J, Deutsch SI.

Mental Health Service Line, Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, DC 20422, USA.

OBJECTIVE: There are preclinical data showing that fluoxetine stimulated expression of Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) and its specific tyrosine kinase receptor, and caused neuritic elongation and increased dendritic branching density of CA3 hippocampal pyramidal cell neurons in rodents. The latter effect of fluoxetine has been referred to as neuronal remodeling. In view of this preclinical data, we wondered if specific cognitive measures could serve as novel therapeutic targets for fluoxetine in head-injured patients. Theoretically, fluoxetine-induced "neuronal remodeling" might improve cognition, independently of a primary effect on mood. METHOD: In an open-label pilot investigation, fluoxetine hydrochloride (Prozac; 20-60 mg/day) was administered to a heterogeneous group of five head-injured patients with either no or moderate depression for a period of eight months. These patients had no histories of prior treatment with antidepressant medications. They were administered cognitive and memory tests at baseline and after eight months of treatment on fluoxetine. RESULTS: The preliminary results showed that fluoxetine improved mood, in addition to improving performance on the Trail Making Test Part A, an attentional-motor speed task, and the letter-number sequencing subtest of the WAIS-III, a measure reflecting "working memory." CONCLUSIONS: Although fluoxetine had beneficial effects on some measures of cognition, more work is needed to connect these improvements with neuronal remodeling.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12779183&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine




Neuropharmacology. 2003 Mar;44(3):342-53.
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors enhance cocaine-induced locomotor activity and dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens.

Bubar MJ, McMahon LR, De Deurwaerdere P, Spampinato U, Cunningham KA.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77550-1031, USA.

The role for serotonin (5-HT) in mediating the behavioral effects of cocaine may be related in part to the ability of 5-HT to modulate the function of the dopamine (DA) mesoaccumbens pathways. In the present study, the ability of the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, IP) and fluvoxamine (10 and 20 mg/kg, IP) to alter cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP)-induced hyperactivity and DA release in the nucleus accumbens (NAc) was analyzed in male Sprague-Dawley rats. Systemic administration of either fluoxetine or fluvoxamine enhanced cocaine-induced locomotor activity in a dose-dependent manner; fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, IP) also enhanced cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP)-induced DA efflux in the NAc. To test the hypothesis that the NAc serves as the locus of action underlying these effects following systemic cocaine administration, fluoxetine (1 and 3 micro g/0.2 micro l/side) or fluvoxamine (1 and 3 micro g/0.2 micro l/side) was microinfused into the NAc shell prior to systemic administration of cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP). Intra-NAc shell infusion of 3 micro g of fluoxetine or fluvoxamine enhanced cocaine-induced hyperactivity, while infusion of fluoxetine (1 micro M) through the microdialysis probe implanted into the NAc shell enhanced cocaine (10 mg/kg, IP)-induced DA efflux in the NAc. Thus, the ability of systemic injection of SSRIs to enhance cocaine-evoked hyperactivity and DA efflux in the NAc is mediated in part by local actions of the SSRIs in the NAc.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12604093&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine

ncl.ac.uk

Both glucocorticoids and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) alter aspects of 5-HT function including somatodendritic 5-HT1A autoreceptor sensitivity. Many depressed patients prescribed SSRIs have pre-existing flattened diurnal gluococorticoid rhythm. In these patients, interactions between flattened glucocorticoid rhythm and chronic SSRIs, which impact on the SSRI's ability to elevate forebrain 5-HT, may alter clinical efficacy. To address this issue rats underwent implantation of slow-release corticosterone (75 mg pellet s.c.) (to flatten the glucocorticoid rhythm) or sham surgery, and injection of fluoxetine (10 mg/kg/day i.p., 12 days) or vehicle. Using microdialysis in the frontal cortex we found that (21 h after the last injection) extracellular 5-HT was elevated in fluoxetine- or corticosterone-treated animals, but not in those treated with corticosterone plus fluoxetine. In fluoxetine-treated animals, blockade of terminal reuptake by local perfusion of fluoxetine increased 5-HT to the same level as it did in controls, suggesting normal terminal 5-HT release after chronic fluoxetine. However, 5-HT levels following local reuptake blockade in both the corticosterone and corticosterone plus fluoxetine groups were lower than controls, suggesting a corticosterone-induced decrease in terminal release. Finally in fluoxetine, corticosterone, and corticosterone plus fluoxetine groups, there was marked 5-HT1A receptor desensitization, evidenced by attenuation of the decrease in 5-HT release following systemic fluoxetine injection. The data indicate that, despite desensitization of 5-HT1A autorece

prdus.jnj.com

Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, is used widely to treat depression and related disorders. By inhibiting presynaptic 5-HT reuptake, fluoxetine is thought to act by increasing 5-HT in the synaptic cleft, thus 5-HT binding to postsynaptic 5-HT(2A/2C) receptors. These receptors can be coupled via a G-protein to phospholipase A(2) (PLA(2)), which when activated releases the second messenger arachidonic acid from synaptic membrane phospholipids. To image this activation, fluoxetine (10 mg/kg) or saline vehicle was administered i.p. to unanesthetized rats, and regional brain incorporation coefficients k(*) of intravenously injected radiolabeled arachidonic acid were measured after 30 min. Compared with vehicle, fluoxetine significantly increased k(*) in prefrontal, motor, somatosensory, and olfactory cortex, as well as in the basal ganglia, hippocampus, and thalamus. Many of these regions demonstrate high densities of the serotonin reuptake transporter and of 5-HT(2A/2C) receptors. Brain stem, spinal cord, and cerebellum, which showed no significant response to fluoxetine, have low densities of the transporters and receptors. The results show that it is possible to image quantitatively PLA(2)-mediated signal transduction in vivo in response to fluoxetine.

Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12784122&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine







Fluoxetine Online References

Fluoxetine Online References 1 | Fluoxetine Online References 2 | Fluoxetine Online References 3 | Fluoxetine Online References 4 | Fluoxetine Online References 5 | Fluoxetine Online References 6 | Fluoxetine Online References 7 | Fluoxetine Online References 8 | Fluoxetine Online References 9 | Fluoxetine Online References 10 | Fluoxetine Online References 11 | Fluoxetine Online References 12 | Fluoxetine Online References 13 | Fluoxetine Online References 14 | Fluoxetine Online References 15 | Fluoxetine Online References 16 | Fluoxetine Online References 17 | Fluoxetine Online References 18 | Fluoxetine Online References 19 | Fluoxetine Online References 20 | Fluoxetine Online References 21 | Fluoxetine Online References 22 | Fluoxetine Online References 23 | Fluoxetine Online References 24 | Fluoxetine Online References 25 | Fluoxetine Online References 26 | Fluoxetine Online References 27 | Fluoxetine Online References 28 | Fluoxetine Online References 29 | Fluoxetine Online References 30 | Fluoxetine Online References 31 | Fluoxetine Online References 32 | Fluoxetine Online References 33 | Fluoxetine Online References 34 | Fluoxetine Online References 35 | Fluoxetine Online References 36 | Fluoxetine Online References 37 | Fluoxetine Online References 38 | Fluoxetine Online References 39 | Fluoxetine Online References 40 | Fluoxetine Online References 41 | Fluoxetine Online References 42 | Fluoxetine Online References 43 | Fluoxetine Online References 44