|
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1989 Oct;34(2):381-6. Spiroxatrine augments fluoxetine-induced reduction of ethanol intake by the P line of rats.
McBride WJ, Murphy JM, Lumeng L, Li TK.
Department of Psychiatry, R. L. Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
The present study was undertaken to determine if spiroxatrine, a reported 5-HT1A antagonist, could block the attenuating effects of fluoxetine (a 5-HT uptake inhibitor) on voluntary ethanol intake by the selectively bred alcohol-preferring P line of rats. Fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, IP) significantly reduced the intake of 10% ethanol by P rats approximately 50% during the 4-hour period of alcohol availability. Spiroxatrine (4 mg/kg, IP) was without effect on ethanol intake when given alone. However, when given 5 minutes before fluoxetine (10 mg/kg, IP), this dose of spiroxatrine augmented the reduction of ethanol intake to approximately 15% of control values after 4 hours. Similar experiments conducted with 1 mg/kg (IP) 8-hydroxy-2(di-N-propylamino) tetralin (DPAT) demonstrated that this 5-HT1A agonist also enhanced the attenuating effects of fluoxetine on ethanol intake. Likewise, spiroxatrine augmented the DPAT reduction of alcohol intake. Spiroxatrine enhanced the effect of DPAT and fluoxetine on food intake as it did on ethanol intake. The results suggest that spiroxatrine behaved as a partial agonist and/or modulator and not as an antagonist at 5-HT1A receptors under the present experimental conditions.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2533688&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
Res Commun Chem Pathol Pharmacol. 1989 Dec;66(3):375-84. Effect of fluoxetine pretreatment on plasma and tissue concentrations of desipramine in rats.
Fuller RW, Perry KW.
Eli Lilly and Company, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285.
Because of clinical reports that fluoxetine co-administration has led to increased blood concentrations of desipramine and adverse clinical effects in depressed patients treated with desipramine, we investigated the effect of fluoxetine on desipramine metabolism by rat liver microsomes in vitro and on blood and brain concentrations of desipramine in rats treated with desipramine. Fluoxetine caused a concentration-dependent inhibition of the 2-hydroxylation and N-demethylation of desipramine in vitro. Fluoxetine increased blood and brain concentrations of desipramine and prolonged the half-life of desipramine in blood and brain in rats in vivo. The inhibition of desipramine metabolism by fluoxetine probably led to the increased blood levels of desipramine in the clinical cases and may have contributed to the acceleration of cortical beta adrenoreceptor downregulation reported in rats when desipramine and fluoxetine were co-administered.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2609015&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1989 Apr;98(2):198-205. Placental transfer and fetal distribution of fluoxetine in the rat.
Pohland RC, Byrd TK, Hamilton M, Koons JR.
Toxicology Division, Eli Lilly and Company, Greenfield, Indiana 46140.
Previously conducted reproduction and teratology studies in rats (unpublished observations) exposed to fluoxetine have revealed no compound-related adverse effects on fertility and no teratogenic effects. In order to confirm embryonic/fetal exposure to fluoxetine and/or metabolites, dissection and whole-body autoradiographic techniques were utilized to determine the placental transfer and fetal distribution in 12- and 18-day-pregnant Wistar rats 1, 4, 8, and 24 hr following a single oral 12.5 mg/kg dose of [14C]fluoxetine. On gestation Days 12 (organogenesis) and 18 (postorganogenesis), peak concentrations of radiocarbon occurred 4-8 hr after dose administration in the placenta, embryo/fetus, amniotic fluid, and maternal kidney, brain, and lung, and declined slightly at 24 hr postdose. Maternal lung contained the highest tissue concentration of radiocarbon at all time points. Placenta and maternal brain, kidney, and liver contained moderate levels of radioactivity, while embryonic/fetal tissue, amniotic fluid, and maternal plasma contained low levels of radioactivity. Mean fetal concentrations of radiocarbon at 4, 8, and 24 hr on gestation Day 18 were higher than mean embryonic concentrations on Day 12 of gestation. Analytical characterization of radioactivity indicated that combined fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations accounted for 63-80% of the total radiocarbon concentrations in embryonic/fetal tissue. Results indicated that embryonic/fetal and maternal tissue levels of fluoxetine were greatest at early time points and declined with time, while norfluoxetine tissue levels were highest at the 24-hr time point. Whole-body autoradiographic techniques demonstrated that radioactivity associated with [14C]fluoxetine and/or its metabolites traversed the placenta and di
Ther Drug Monit. 1989;11(2):165-70. Serum fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations and antidepressant response.
Kelly MW, Perry PJ, Holstad SG, Garvey MJ.
Department of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
A high-performance liquid chromatography assay for fluoxetine and its major metabolite, norfluoxetine, was established. Serum concentrations of the two were measured in 13 depressed outpatients following a 6-week trial of the drug. No significant correlations were obvious between clinical improvement as measured by the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression and the Clinical Global Impression scores and the serum concentrations of fluoxetine and its major metabolite, norfluoxetine, according to these initial pilot data.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2785723&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988 Aug;30(4):823-7. Attenuation of alcohol intake by a serotonin uptake inhibitor: evidence for mediation through the renin-angiotensin system.
Grupp LA, Perlanski E, Stewart RB.
Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Although the serotonin uptake inhibitors have been shown to reduce alcohol intake in both animals and man, the mechanism of this effect is unclear. It is known that enhanced serotonergic activity can stimulate activity in the renin-angiotensin system and that elevated activity in the renin-angiotensin system can reduce voluntary alcohol intake. Therefore, serotonin uptake inhibitors such as fluoxetine might exert their effect on alcohol intake, in part, through the renin-angiotensin system. The present experiment assesses this possibility by examining the effect of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, on the fluoxetine-induced decrease in alcohol intake. Four groups of rats were offered limited access to alcohol for 1 hr each day. When intake stabilized each group was injected with 2.5, 5.0 or 10.0 mg/kg of fluoxetine or the saline vehicle 1 hr prior to the access to alcohol. Fluoxetine produced a dose-dependent decrease in alcohol intake. Following this, all groups received injections of 1 mg/kg of the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, enalapril, 40 min prior to the fluoxetine. Enalapril had no effect on alcohol intake in the saline group, but reversed the suppression in alcohol intake produced by the 2.5 mg/kg and 5.0 mg/kg doses of fluoxetine and partially reversed the effect of the 10.0 mg/kg dose. These findings indicate that the fluoxetine-induced reduction in alcohol intake may, in part, be mediated through the renin-angiotensin system.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2852370&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1988 Apr;43(4):412-9. The effect of fluoxetine on the pharmacokinetics and psychomotor responses of diazepam.
Lemberger L, Rowe H, Bosomworth JC, Tenbarge JB, Bergstrom RF.
Lilly Laboratory for Clinical Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN.
To determine the effect of fluoxetine on diazepam's pharmacokinetic and psychomotor responses, single oral doses of 10 mg diazepam were administered to six normal subjects on three occasions, either alone or in combination with 60 mg fluoxetine. Diazepam was given alone, after a single dose of fluoxetine, and after eight daily doses of fluoxetine. Psychometric data showed that fluoxetine had no significant effect on the psychomotor responses to diazepam. However, the pharmacokinetic data indicated a change in diazepam disposition after fluoxetine administration. Diazepam AUC was larger, the half-life was longer, and the plasma clearance was lower after fluoxetine administration, suggesting that fluoxetine inhibited the metabolism of diazepam. The reduced formation of an active metabolite, N-desmethyldiazepam, also suggested that fluoxetine inhibited diazepam's metabolism. The clinical implications of this pharmacokinetic drug-drug interaction are minor because psychomotor responses were unaffected and offsetting changes in the kinetics of diazepam and its metabolite occurred. Dosage modification of either fluoxetine or diazepam is unlikely to be necessary.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3128416&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
J Med Chem. 1988 Jul;31(7):1412-7. Absolute configurations and pharmacological activities of the optical isomers of fluoxetine, a selective serotonin-uptake inhibitor.
Robertson DW, Krushinski JH, Fuller RW, Leander JD.
Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285.
Fluoxetine is a potent and selective inhibitor of the neuronal serotonin-uptake carrier and is a clinically effective antidepressant. Although fluoxetine is used therapeutically as the racemate, there appears to be a small but demonstrable stereospecificity associated with its interactions with the serotonin-uptake carrier. The goals of this study were to determine the absolute configurations of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and to examine whether the actions of fluoxetine in behavioral tests were enantiospecific. (S)-Fluoxetine was synthesized from (S)-(-)-3-chloro-1-phenylpropanol by sequential reaction with sodium iodide, methylamine, sodium hydride, and 4-fluorobenzotrifluoride. (S)-Fluoxetine is dextrorotatory (+1.60) in methanol, but is levorotatory (-10.85) in water. Fluoxetine enantiomers were derivatized with (R)-1-(1-naphthyl)ethyl isocyanate, and the resulting ureas were assayed by 1H NMR or HPLC to determine optical purities of the fluoxetine samples. Both enantiomers antagonized writhing in mice; following sc administration of (R)- and (S)-fluoxetine, ED50 values were 15.3 and 25.7 mg/kg, respectively. Moreover, both enantiomers potentiated a subthreshold analgesic dose (0.25 mg/kg) of morphine, and ED50 values were 3.6 and 5.7 mg/kg, respectively. Following ip administration to mice, the two stereoisomers antagonized p-chloroamphetamine-induced depletion of whole brain serotonin concentrations. ED50 values for (S)- and (R)-fluoxetine were 1.2 and 2.1 mg/kg, respectively. The two enantiomers decreased palatability-induced ingestion following ip administration to rats; (R)- and (S)-fluoxetine reduced saccharin-induced drinking with ED50 values of 6.1 and 4.9 mg/kg, respectively
Life Sci. 1988;42(25):2569-75. Pressor responses to tyramine and norepinephrine after subchronic administration of fluoxetine to man.
Bowsher DJ, Rowe H, Farid NA, Tenbarge JB, Lemberger L.
Lilly Laboratory for Clinical Research, Eli Lilly and Company, Wishard Memorial Hospital, Indianapolis, IN 46202.
The effects of subchronic, oral administration of fluoxetine (60 mg daily for 45 days) were studied in three healthy male volunteers. The pressor responses to intravenous bolus tyramine injections or norepinephrine infusions were assessed during the one-week placebo period, periodically after daily fluoxetine dosing, and then for 11 days post-fluoxetine dosing. The dose-pressor responses, determined from the incremental elevation of systolic blood pressure, were unchanged in each of the three dosing intervals. These results indicate that fluoxetine does not significantly impair the catecholamine uptake mechanism in the peripheral adrenergic neuron on acute or subchronic dosing, nor is any rebound-increased sensitivity evident after subchronic administration. Further, fluoxetine does not appear to demonstrate peripheral alpha-adrenolytic properties in man.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3260321&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
Clin Chem. 1988 Sep;34(9):1875-8. Determination of the antidepressant fluoxetine and its metabolite norfluoxetine in serum by reversed-phase HPLC with ultraviolet detection.
Orsulak PJ, Kenney JT, Debus JR, Crowley G, Wittman PD.
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
A procedure has been developed for measuring fluoxetine and its desmethyl metabolite, norfluoxetine, in serum by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), with ultraviolet detection at 226 nm. Fluoxetine and norfluoxetine are isolated from serum by liquid-liquid extraction. They are then separated by HPLC and quantified, with reduced haloperidol as the internal standard. Fluoxetine, norfluoxetine, and the reduced haloperidol are separated from all interfering peaks in about 15 min. The standard curve is linear (r = 1.000) for both fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations over the range of 25 to 800 micrograms/L. Between-run CVs for 60 and 200 micrograms/L controls (n = 8) were 6.8 and 4.1% for fluoxetine, and 8.8 and 6.2% for norfluoxetine, respectively. In a study of 24 patients with depression who were being treated with 20-60 mg of fluoxetine per day, fluoxetine and norfluoxetine concentrations in serum, measured during the last three weeks of treatment, were 47-469 micrograms/L and 52-446 micrograms/L, respectively.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3262022&dopt=Abstract fluoxetine
Fluoxetine Online References
Fluoxetine Online References 1 |
Fluoxetine Online References 2 |
Fluoxetine Online References 3 |
Fluoxetine Online References 4 |
Fluoxetine Online References 5 |
Fluoxetine Online References 6 |
Fluoxetine Online References 7 |
Fluoxetine Online References 8 |
Fluoxetine Online References 9 |
Fluoxetine Online References 10 |
Fluoxetine Online References 11 |
Fluoxetine Online References 12 |
Fluoxetine Online References 13 |
Fluoxetine Online References 14 |
Fluoxetine Online References 15 |
Fluoxetine Online References 16 |
Fluoxetine Online References 17 |
Fluoxetine Online References 18 |
Fluoxetine Online References 19 |
Fluoxetine Online References 20 |
Fluoxetine Online References 21 |
Fluoxetine Online References 22 |
Fluoxetine Online References 23 |
Fluoxetine Online References 24 |
Fluoxetine Online References 25 |
Fluoxetine Online References 26 |
Fluoxetine Online References 27 |
Fluoxetine Online References 28 |
Fluoxetine Online References 29 |
Fluoxetine Online References 30 |
Fluoxetine Online References 31 |
Fluoxetine Online References 32 |
Fluoxetine Online References 33 |
Fluoxetine Online References 34 |
Fluoxetine Online References 35 |
Fluoxetine Online References 36 |
Fluoxetine Online References 37 |
Fluoxetine Online References 38 |
Fluoxetine Online References 39 |
Fluoxetine Online References 40 |
Fluoxetine Online References 41 |
Fluoxetine Online References 42 |
Fluoxetine Online References 43 |
Fluoxetine Online References 44
| |