Dose-comparison study of the combination of ezetimibe and simvastatin (Vytorin) versus atorvastatin in patients with hypercholesterolemia: the Vytorin Versus Atorvastatin (VYVA) study.

Palmisano J.

Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex, USA.

BACKGROUND: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) is the primary therapeutic target in the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III (ATP III) guidelines. This study tested the hypothesis that ezetimibe/simvastatin, a lipid-lowering agent that inhibits both intestinal cholesterol absorption and cholesterol synthesis, provides greater LDL-C reductions than atorvastatin across dose ranges. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, 6-week parallel-group study randomized 1902 patients with LDL-C above ATP III goal to atorvastatin (10, 20, 40, or 80 mg) or to ezetimibe/simvastatin (10/10, 10/20, 10/40, or 10/80 mg). Patients were stratified by prerandomization LDL-C level. RESULTS: At each milligram-equivalent statin dose comparison, and averaged across doses, ezetimibe/simvastatin provided greater LDL-C reductions (47%-59%) than atorvastatin (36%-53%). Ezetimibe/simvastatin 10/40 and 10/80 mg also provided significantly greater high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) increases than atorvastatin 40 and 80 mg. Triglyceride reductions were similar for all comparisons. More ezetimibe/simvastatin than atorvastatin patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) or CHD risk equivalents attained the ATP III LDL-C goal of <100 mg/dL and the optional LDL-C target of <70 mg/dL. C-reactive protein reductions were similar between treatment groups. Consecutive elevations in alanine aminotransferase and/or aspartate aminotransferase occurred in significantly more atorvastatin patients than ezetimibe/simvastatin patients. No myopathy or liver-related adverse events led to study discontinuation with either drug. CONCLUSIONS: Ezetimibe/simvastatin was more effective than atorvastatin in lowering LDL-C at each dose comparison and provided greater increases in HDL-C at the 40- and 80-mg statin dose. Ezetimibe/simvastatin is a highly efficacious, well-tolerated treatment option for hypercholesterolemic patients.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15864235&dopt=Abstract simvastatin, Zocor




Simvastatin does not inhibit intimal hyperplasia and restenosis but promotes plaque regression in normocholesterolemic patients undergoing coronary stenting: a randomized study with intravascular ultrasound.

Mariani M.

Cardiothoracic Department, Pisa, Italy.

BACKGROUND: Restenosis after coronary stenting is mainly caused by intimal hyperplasia. Both experimental and clinical studies suggest that statins may be able to inhibit intimal hyperplasia and, therefore, in-stent restenosis (ISR), by mechanisms beyond lipid lowering. METHODS: In a 12-month study, we randomized 71 normocholesterolemic patients to 20 mg simvastatin or no treatment, 2 weeks before elective coronary stenting. Patients were evaluated by quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound, immediately after the index procedure and at the 12-month catheterization. RESULTS: Binary ISR was present in 15% and in 18% of simvastatin-treated patients and controls, respectively (P = NS). Intimal hyperplasia did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (3.6 +/- 1.8 vs 3.8 +/- 2.3 mm3/mm, 34% +/- 15% vs 35% +/- 23% for simvastatin vs controls, P = NS). However, peristent plaque decreased with simvastatin but increased in controls (-4.0 +/- 4.0 vs +1.6 +/- 3.8 mm3/mm, -14% +/- 10% vs +6% +/- 12%, P < .05). The same behavior was shown by intermediate plaques at nonstented sites (-2.5 +/- 3.0 vs +1.0 +/- 3.0 mm3/mm, -10% +/- 8% vs +9% +/- 9%, P < .05). Major adverse events at 12 months were present in 11% and 24% of simvastatin-treated patients and controls, respectively (P = .20). CONCLUSIONS: In normocholesterolemic patients undergoing coronary stenting, simvastatin does not prevent intimal hyperplasia or ISR, but it promotes atherosclerotic regression both at stented and at nonstented sites.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15864242&dopt=Abstract simvastatin, Zocor




Simvastatin versus ezetimibe: pleiotropic and lipid-lowering effects on endothelial function in humans.

Drexler H.

Abteilung Kardiologie und Angiologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany. Landmesser.Ulf MH-Hannover.de

BACKGROUND: Statins may exert important pleiotropic effects, ie, improve endothelial function, independently of their impact on LDL cholesterol. In humans, however, pleiotropic effects of statins have never been unequivocally demonstrated because prolonged statin treatment always results in reduced LDL cholesterol levels. We therefore tested the hypothesis that similar reductions in LDL cholesterol with simvastatin and ezetimibe, a novel cholesterol absorption inhibitor, result in different effects on endothelial function. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty patients with chronic heart failure were randomized to 4 weeks of simvastatin (10 mg/d) or ezetimibe (10 mg/d) treatment. Flow-dependent dilation (FDD) of the radial artery was determined by high-resolution ultrasound before and after intra-arterial vitamin C to determine the portion of FDD inhibited by radicals (DeltaFDD-VC). Activity of extracellular superoxide dismutase, a major vascular antioxidant enzyme system, was determined after release from the endothelium by a heparin bolus injection. Endothelial progenitor cells were analyzed with an in vitro assay. Simvastatin and ezetimibe treatment reduced LDL cholesterol to a similar extent (15.6% versus 15.4%; P=NS), whereas changes in mevalonate, the product of HMG-CoA-reductase, differed between groups (Deltamevalonate-simvastatin, -1.04+/-0.62 versus Deltamevalonate-ezetimibe, 1.79+/-0.94 ng/mL; P<0.05 between groups). Importantly, FDD was markedly improved after simvastatin (10.5+/-0.6% versus 5.1+/-0.7%; P<0.01) but not after ezetimibe treatment (5.6+/-0.5% versus 5.8+/-0.6%; P=NS). DeltaFDD-VC was substantially reduced after simvastatin but not after ezetimibe treatment. Extracellular superoxide dismutase activity was increased by >100% (P<0.05) after simvastatin but not ezetimibe treatment. Simvastatin treatment increased the number of functionally active endothelial progenitor cells, whereas ezetimibe had no effect. CONCLUSIONS: Four weeks of simvastatin treatment improves endothelial function independently of LDL cholesterol lowering, at least in part by reducing oxidant stress. Simvastatin may thereby exert important pleiotropic effects in humans.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15867181&dopt=Abstract simvastatin, Zocor




Promotion of bone formation by simvastatin in polyethylene particle-induced osteolysis.

von Knoch M.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kantonsspital Chur, Loestrasse 170, 7000 Chur, Switzerland.

The effects of statins on bone formation in periprosthetic osteolysis have not been determined to date. We investigated the effect of the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor simvastatin on osteoblastic bone formation under conditions of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) particle-induced osteolysis. The murine calvarial osteolysis model was utilized in 21 C57BL/J6 mice randomized to three groups. Group I underwent sham surgery only, group II received UHMWPE particles, and group III, particles and simvastatin treatment. After 2 weeks, calvaria were processed for histomorphometry and stained with Giemsa dye. New bone formation was measured as osteoid tissue area within the midline suture. Bone thickness was quantified as indicator of net bone growth. Statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA and a Student's t-test. New bone formation and bone thickness were significantly enhanced following simvastatin treatment. New bone formation was 0.008+/-0.008mm(2) in sham controls (group I), 0.015+/-0.012mm(2) after particle implantation without further intervention (group II), compared to 0.083+/-0.021mm(2) with particle implantation and simvastatin treatment (group III) (p=0.003). The bone thickness was 0.213+/-0.007mm in group I, 0.183+/-0.005mm in group II, and 0.238+/-0.009mm in group III (p=0.00008). In conclusion, simvastatin treatment markedly promoted bone formation and net bone growth in UHMWPE particle-induced osteolysis in a murine calvarial model. These new findings indicate that simvastatin may have favorable osteoanabolic effects on wear debris-mediated osteolysis after total joint arthroplasty, involving local stimulation of osteoblastic bone formation.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15869791&dopt=Abstract simvastatin, Zocor




Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma from moderately hypercholesterolaemic type 1 diabetic patients is enhanced, and is unaffected by simvastatin treatment.

Dullaart RP.

Department of Endocrinology, University of Groningen and University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, Groningen, 9700, The Netherlands, r.de.vries int.umcg.nl.

AIM/HYPOTHESIS: Cellular cholesterol efflux to plasma is important in reverse cholesterol transport and may be affected by simvastatin in type 1 diabetes mellitus. METHODS: In 14 moderately hypercholesterolaemic type 1 diabetic and 13 healthy men we determined plasma (apo)lipoproteins, pre-beta HDL formation, cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) activity, phospholipid transfer protein (PLTP) activity, cholesterol esterification, cholesteryl ester transfer and the capacity of plasma to induce cholesterol efflux out of Fu5AH cells and fibroblasts. After diet run-in, diabetic patients were randomly treated with simvastatin 10, 20, 40 mg and placebo, once daily each, for 6 weeks in a double-blind crossover design. RESULTS: Plasma very low density lipid protein (VLDL)+LDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL phospholipids, apolipoprotein (apo) A-I, apo B, CETP activity, PLTP activity, cholesterol esterification, cholesteryl ester transfer and the capacity of plasma to induce cholesterol efflux from Fu5AH cells and fibroblasts were higher in diabetic patients. Pre-beta HDL formation was unaltered. Simvastatin treatment decreased VLDL+LDL cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides and apo B, CETP activity, cholesterol esterification and cholesteryl ester transfer. HDL cholesterol increased and its change was correlated with the change in cholesteryl ester transfer. The ability to promote cholesterol efflux from Fu5AH cells and fibroblasts did not change after simvastatin. CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION: The capacity of plasma from moderately hypercholesterolaemic type 1 diabetic patients to induce cholesterol efflux out of Fu5AH cells and fibroblasts is enhanced, probably due to higher apo A-I, HDL phospholipids and PLTP activity. Simvastatin increases HDL cholesterol in type 1 diabetic patients via lowering of plasma cholesteryl ester transfer. The HDL changes after simvastatin do not increase cellular cholesterol efflux further.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15875154&dopt=Abstract simvastatin, Zocor




Simvastatin augments lipopolysaccharide-induced proinflammatory responses in macrophages by differential regulation of the c-Fos and c-Jun transcription factors.

Aderem A.

Institute for Systems Biology, 1441 North 34th Street, Seattle, WA 98103-8904, USA.

The 3-hydroxyl-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, or statins, are a widely used class of drugs for cholesterol reduction. The reduction in mortality and morbidity in statin-treated patients is incompletely explained by their effects on cholesterol, and an anti-inflammatory role for the drug has been proposed. We report in this work that, unexpectedly, simvastatin enhances LPS-induced IL-12p40 production by murine macrophages, and that it does so by activating the IL-12p40 promoter. Mutational analysis and dominant-negative expression studies indicate that both C/EBP and AP-1 transcription factors have a crucial role in promoter activation. This occurs via a c-Fos- and c-Jun-based mechanism; we demonstrate that ectopic expression of c-Jun activates the IL-12p40 promoter, whereas expression of c-Fos inhibits IL-12p40 promoter activity. Simvastatin prevents LPS-induced c-Fos expression, thereby relieving the inhibitory effect of c-Fos on the IL-12p40 promoter. Concomitantly, simvastatin induces the phosphorylation of c-Jun by the c-Jun N-terminal kinase, resulting in c-Jun-dependent activation of the IL-12p40 promoter. This appears to be a general mechanism because simvastatin also augments LPS-dependent activation of the TNF-alpha promoter, perhaps because the TNF-alpha promoter has C/EBP and AP-1 binding sites in a similar configuration to the IL-12p40 promoter. The fact that simvastatin potently augments LPS-induced IL-12p40 and TNF-alpha production has implications for the treatment of bacterial infections in statin-treated patients.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15187114&dopt=Abstract simvastatin, Zocor