|
Protopic Interleukin-2-dependent mechanisms are involved in the development of glomerulosclerosis after partial renal ablation in rats.
Hamar P, Peti-Peterdi J, Szabo A, Becker G, Flach R, Rosivall L, Heemann U.
Department of Nephrology, University Hospital, Essen, Germany.
BACKGROUND: Glomerulosclerosis is a common feature of many end-stage renal diseases. The contribution of cellular immune mechanisms has been implicated in the development of glomerulosclerosis. We investigated whether the inhibition of lymphocyte activation influences this process in an established rat model of renal hyperfiltration. METHODS: After removal of two-thirds of their respective kidney mass, rats were treated with either tacrolimus (0.08 mg/kg/day) or vehicle until the end of the study (n = 10/group). The rats were pair-fed and proteinuria was assessed regularly. Twenty weeks after nephrectomy, creatinine clearance and systemic blood pressure were determined, and kidneys were harvested for morphological, immunohistological and PCR analysis. RESULTS: In control animals, renal function started to decline from week 12, as indicated by an elevated proteinuria. Interleukin (IL)-2 and IL-2 receptor synthesis was upregulated in control animals and inhibited by tacrolimus treatment. Transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-beta(1)), platelet-derived growth factor-AA (PDGF-AA) and macrophage chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) mRNA levels were upregulated in control animals, but were significantly lower in immunosuppressed hosts. Additionally, tacrolimus treatment resulted in a significant reduction of proteinuria. Morphological analysis supported these functional results; glomerular sclerosis, tubular atrophy and intimal proliferation were more pronounced in controls than in the tacrolimus group. These morphological parameters were accompanied by reduced infiltration of CD5+ (rat T-cell marker) T cells, ED1+ (rat macrophage marker) macrophages, and less intense staining for laminin and fibronectin. CONCLUSION: A continuous treatment with tacrolimus - an inhibitor of lymphocyte proliferation - reduced the pace of glomerulosclerosis in the remnant kidney. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11150862&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Review of the course and outcome of 100 pregnancies in 84 women treated with tacrolimus.
Kainz A, Harabacz I, Cowlrick IS, Gadgil SD, Hagiwara D.
Safety Information Centre, Fujisawa GmbH, Munich, Germany.
BACKGROUND: The increasing use of tacrolimus as a primary immunosuppressant is paralleled by a growing number of pregnancies occurring in mothers receiving tacrolimus systemically. METHODS: In this retrospective analysis during 1992-1998; data sources were case reports from clinical studies, spontaneous reports from health care professionals, routine surveys by transplant registries, and the published literature. RESULTS: One hundred pregnancies in 84 mothers were recorded. Mean maternal age was 28 years. All except one mother (autoimmune disease) were solid organ transplant recipients (66% liver and 27% kid- ci ney). Mean time from transplantation to conception was 26 months. The mean daily dose of tacrolimus (range 11.7-12.8 mg/day) and the mean tacrolimus whole blood level (range 8.5-11.5 ng/ml) remained fairly constant from preconception through the third trimester. The most frequent maternal complications were graft rejection followed by preeclampsia, renal impairment, and infection. All cases of rejection were successfully treated with corticosteroids and did not result in graft loss. Of 100 pregnancies, 71 progressed to delivery (68 live births, 2 neonatal deaths, and 1 stillbirth), 24 were terminated (12 spontaneous and 12 induced), 2 pregnancies were ongoing, and 3 were lost to follow-up. Mean gestation period was 35 weeks with 59% deliveries being premature (<37 weeks). The birth weight (mean 2573 g) was appropriate for gestational age in 90% of cases. Most common complications in the neonate were hypoxia, hyperkalemia, and renal dysfunction. These were transient in nature. Four neonates presented with malformations, without any consistent pattern of affected organs. CONCLUSION: Pregnancy in tacrolimus-treated transplant recipients resulted in a favourable outcome. Complications of the mother and neonate were similar to those previously described with other immunosuppressants.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11152103&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Cardiovascular risk factors in renal transplant patients: cyclosporin A versus tacrolimus.
Ligtenberg G, Hene RJ, Blankestijn PJ, Koomans HA.
Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, University Medical Center, Room F03.226, Post Box 85500, 3508 GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. gligtenb digd.azu.nl
The hypertensive and hyperlipidemic effects of cyclosporin A (CsA) may contribute to the high cardiovascular morbidity in renal transplant patients and to the development of chronic transplant nephropathy. Tacrolimus is reported to have less effect on BP and lipids, but steroids, other drugs, and renal function may confound this. This study assessed 24-h BP and lipid profile in stable renal transplant recipients (n = 17) while they were receiving CsA, after 4 wk of receiving tacrolimus, and again after 4 wk of receiving CsA. Antihypertensives were stopped at least 3 wk before. A few patients used low-dose steroids and lipid-lowering drugs, which were not changed during the study. Mean daytime BP decreased from 149 +/- 12 and 95 +/- 8 mmHg to 138 +/- 13 and 87 +/- 9 mmHg (P: < 0.001) after patients were switched to tacrolimus. Mean nighttime BP also decreased, from 140 +/- 12/86 +/- 7 mmHg to 132 +/- 17/79 +/- 10 mmHg (P: < 0.05). Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol decreased from 6.1 +/- 0.7 and 3.84 +/- 0.79 mmol/L to 5.1 +/- 0.8 and 2.98 +/- 0.75 mmol/L (P: < 0.001). Return to CsA caused an increase in BP and cholesterol to values similar as during the first CsA period. The conclusion is that tacrolimus has fewer unfavorable effects on BP and lipids than does CsA. Elective conversion from CsA to tacrolimus in stable renal transplant recipients may lead to attenuation of cardiovascular morbidity and chronic transplant nephropathy in the long term.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11158228&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Plasma transforming growth factor beta(1) and platelet activation: implications for studies in transplant recipients.
Coupes BM, Williams S, Roberts IS, Short CD, Brenchley PE.
Renal Research Laboratories, Manchester Institute of Nephrology and Transplantation, The Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK.
BACKGROUND: Evidence from animal models supports the hypothesis that dysregulated transforming growth factor beta(1) (TGF beta(1)) expression plays a role in chronic allograft rejection, the progression of diabetic nephropathy and fibrotic glomerulopathies. However, more evidence is required to support this hypothesis in man, and the current literature concerning blood TGF beta(1) levels in clinical studies is highly confused. We have investigated: (i) the hypothesis that the widespread practice of activating clinical samples prior to measurement of TGF beta(1) is detecting the platelet-released pool of TGF beta(1), artefactually generated on venepuncture and unrepresentative of the real circulating in vivo TGF beta(1) pool; and (ii) the effect of different immunosuppressive drugs on apparent TGF beta(1) plasma levels. METHODS: The effect of two different venepuncture procedures on plasma TGF beta(1) was compared in 10 healthy volunteers, one procedure designed to minimize platelet activation and the other representing standard venepuncture practice in a clinic situation. Blood samples from 52 renal transplant recipients on either cyclosporine or tacrolimus immunosuppression were taken by standard venepuncture to investigate the effect of immunosuppressive drugs on plasma TGF beta(1). Plasma TGF beta(1) and beta thromboglobulin were measured by ELISA. RESULTS: Among 10 healthy volunteers who underwent two different methods of venepuncture, eight of 10 had undetectable levels of TGF beta(1) (<100 pg/ml) under conditions that minimize platelet activation. In contrast, all 10 paired plasma samples collected by vacutainer had measurable TGF beta(1) (median 7.70 ng/ml, interquartile range 5.87-13.64 ng/ml) following acid/ urea activation. The median beta TG level (a measure of platelet degranulation) was 0.71 microg/ml (interquartile range 0.53-1.19 microg/ml) in the special collections compared with 3.39 microg/ml (interquartile range 2.27-4.33 microg/ml) in the vacutainer samples (P=0.0029). Among 52 allograft recipients there was a significantly higher mean TGF beta(1) level in plasma from patients on cyclosporine therapy compared with patients on tacrolimus (28,090+/-26,860 pg/ml vs 7173+/-10 610 pg/ml, respectively; P<0.002). Mean plasma beta TG levels were also significantly higher during cyclosporine therapy compared with tacrolimus (8.14+/-5.54 microg/ml vs 3.66+/-3.32 microg/ml, respectively; P<0.002). However, when TGF beta(1) values were corrected for the degree of platelet activation (by factoring with beta TG) there was no significant difference between TGF beta(1) levels on cyclosporine or tacrolimus (4117+/-2993 pg/microg beta TG vs 2971+/-658 pg/microg beta TG, respectively; P=0.294). CONCLUSIONS: To avoid erroneous hypotheses concerning TGF beta(1) and perpetuating confusion in the literature over levels in health and disease, it is imperative that proper internal controls for platelet activation are used. The effects of experimental treatments and drugs on platelet biology must be rigorously controlled when attempting to measure and interpret plasma levels of TGF beta(1) in clinical practice.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11158413&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Tacrolimus monotherapy in adult cardiac transplant recipients: intermediate-term results.
Baran DA, Segura L, Kushwaha S, Courtney M, Correa R, Fallon JT, Cheng J, Lansman SL, Gass AL.
Zena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1030, New York, NY 10029, USA.
Background: Tacrolimus (FK506) is a macrolide antibiotic that inhibits T-cell activation and proliferation. To date, all published trials have used tacrolimus and steroids in combination with either azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Previous experience with pediatric cardiac transplant patients at our institution suggested that use of tacrolimus alone provides an adequate level of immunosuppression and that withdrawal of steroids is readily achieved in most recipients.Between January 1, 1996, and July 7, 1999, we performed 77 adult cardiac transplants. Forty-three of these patients received tacrolimus and prednisone as primary immunosuppression, without azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil. Thirty-two of the 43 patients started on tacrolimus have been weaned off steroids and are maintained on monotherapy. These latter patients form the basis of this report.The mean time for achieving monotherapy was 246 +/- 127 days (range, 106 to 730). Grade > or = 2 rejection occurred at 0.40 episodes per patient in the first 90 days (a combination of Grades 2 and 3A/3B rejections). The freedom from treated rejection (includes all 3A/3B and Grade 2 rejection in the first 90 days) was 69% at 90 days and 52% at 1 year. One patient (of 32) had documented cytomegalovirus infection (gastritis) diagnosed at 8 months post-transplant. We observed 1 case of transplant vasculopathy and 1 case of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder during the follow-up period.Our results show that use of tacrolimus alone after steroid weaning provides effective immunosuppression with low incidence of rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, transplant arteriopathy, or post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11166613&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Tacrolimus conversion improves hyperlipidemic states in stable liver transplant recipients.
Manzarbeitia C, Reich DJ, Rothstein KD, Braitman LE, Levin S, Munoz SJ.
Center for Liver Diseases and Liver Transplant Program, Albert Einstein Medical Center, 5401 Old York Rd., Klein #509, Philadelphia, PA 19141, USA. manzarbc aehn2.einstein.edu
With improvements in surgical technique and the advent of new and more effective immunosuppressive agents, survival rates in liver transplant recipients have dramatically improved. However, hyperlipidemia frequently develops in patients administered cyclosporine-based immunosuppression long-term, although it appears to occur less often with newer, tacrolimus-based regimens. We sought to determine whether an isolated change in the baseline immunosuppressive regimen (cyclosporine to tacrolimus) would improve hyperlipidemic states in these patients. Twenty-one long-term stable liver transplant recipients with hyperlipidemia, manifested by elevated cholesterol and/or triglyceride levels, were offered conversion to tacrolimus from cyclosporine A therapy. Lipid profiles were monitored at baseline (while on cyclosporine therapy) and at 1 and 3 months after conversion to tacrolimus therapy. There were no other medication manipulations. After conversion to tacrolimus therapy, mean cholesterol levels decreased from 251 to 202 mg/dL at 1 month (P <.001) and 194 mg/dL at 3 months (P <.001). Similarly, triglyceride levels decreased from 300 to 207 mg/dL by 1 month (P =.011) and 203 mg/dL by 3 months (P <.001). There was also a statistically significant decrease for very low-density lipoprotein levels at 3 months (P =.005) and low-density lipoprotein levels at 1 and 3 months (P =.013 and P =.014, respectively). High-density lipoprotein levels did not significantly change after conversion to tacrolimus therapy. Conversion was not accompanied by adverse side effects, and patients tolerated the change well. In conclusion, simple conversion from cyclosporine to tacrolimus-based immunosuppression therapy is safe and improves posttransplantation hyperlipidemia in a subgroup of liver transplant recipients.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11172391&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic Human epidermal Langerhans' cells are targets for the immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506).
Panhans-Gross A, Novak N, Kraft S, Bieber T.
Department of Dermatology, Friedrich-Wilhelms-University of Bonn, Germany.
BACKGROUND: The immunosuppressive macrolide tacrolimus (FK506) has been shown to inhibit allergic contact dermatitis in animal models as well as in human beings. More recently, successful treatment of atopic dermatitis with an ointment containing tacrolimus has been reported. OBJECTIVES: We explored the effects of this compound on epidermal Langerhans' cells (LCs), which are known to play an important pathophysiologic role in inflammatory skin diseases. METHODS: The expression of the intracellular FK506 binding protein (FKBP12) was monitored on freshly isolated and cultured epidermal LCs. Phenotyping and functional exploration of LCs treated with different concentrations of tacrolimus and beta-methasone valerate (betaMv) were performed. RESULTS: FKBP12 is expressed in freshly isolated LCs but is lost while they are maturating into mature dendritic cells. Tacrolimus inhibited the expression of IL-2R (CD25) and of the costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7.1) and CD40. Expression of MHC class I and II was also affected, whereas CD86 (B7.2) expression was not altered. In contrast, betaMv strongly increased the expression of CD25. Paradoxically, while decreasing CD40 and MHC class I expression, betaMv significantly increased the expression of MHC class II, CD80, and CD86 on cultured LCs but impaired their allostimulatory activity. Tacrolimus was about 100 times more potent than betaMv at inhibiting LC stimulatory function. CONCLUSION: Tacrolimus can exert immunopharmacologic alterations on LCs, which may account, at least in part, for the therapeutic effect of this compound in eczematous skin diseases.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11174203&dopt=Abstract tacrolimus Protopic
Protopic (tacrolimus) References
Protopic or tacrolimus 1 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 2 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 3 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 4 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 5 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 6 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 7 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 8 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 9 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 10 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 11 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 12 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 13 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 14 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 15 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 16 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 17 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 18 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 19 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 20 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 21 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 22 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 23 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 24 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 25 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 26 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 27 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 28 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 29 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 30 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 31 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 32 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 33 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 34 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 35 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 36 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 37 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 38 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 39 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 40 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 41 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 42 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 43 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 44 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 45 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 46 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 47 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 48 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 49 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 50 |
Protopic or tacrolimus 51
| |