|
omeprazole, Prilosec Gastroprotective effects of pantoprazole against experimental mucosal damage.
Blandizzi C, Natale G, Gherardi G, Lazzeri G, Marveggio C, Colucci R, Carignani D, Del Tacca M.
Department of Oncology, University of Pisa, Italy.
The present study investigated the gastroprotective effects of the proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole on gastric mucosal damage induced by ethanol-HCl in rats. Omeprazole was used as reference drug. The morphometric analysis of gastric histological sections revealed that pantoprazole and omeprazole dose-dependently prevented the necrotic mucosal injury evoked by ethanol-HCl (ED50 = 14.1 and 21.6 micromol/kg, respectively). These effects were associated with a marked increment of Alcian blue recovery from gastric bound mucus (ED50 = 18.8 and 29.3 micromol/kg, respectively). In addition, both pantoprazole and omeprazole inhibited gastric acid secretion in pylorus-ligated rats (ED50 = 1.5 and 3.3 micromol/kg, respectively). Further experiments indicated that the protective effects of pantoprazole were not modified by L-365,260 (a gastrin receptor antagonist), suramin (a drug able to interfere with endogenous growth factors), N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (an inhibitor of nitric oxide synthase) or systemic ablation of capsaicin-sensitive sensory nerves, whereas they were partly blocked by indomethacin (an inhibitor of prostaglandin synthesis) and fully prevented by N-ethylmaleimide (a potent blocker of sulfhydryl compounds). The present data provide histomorphometric evidence that: 1) pantoprazole is endowed with gastroprotective properties and is more active than omeprazole in preventing the necrotic mucosal damage induced by ethanol-HCl; 2) according to the rank order of ED50 values, the protective effects of both drugs appear to depend mainly on the enhancement of the gastric mucosal barrier rather than on the inhibition of acid secretion; 3) an increased production of prostaglandins, as well as an increased availability of sulfhydryl radicals at the level of the gastric mucosa may account for the gastroprotective effects of pantoprazole.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10796055&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec [Effectiveness of omeprazole therapy in children with gastroesophageal reflux diseases(GERD)]
[Article in Polish]
Czerwionka-Szaflarska M, Mierzwa G, Kuczynska R.
Katedra i Klinika Pediatrii, Alergologii i Gastroenterologii Akademii Medycznej w Bydgoszczy.
THE AIM: Of the study was retrospective analysis of omeprazole (Polprazol) therapy efficacy in children with GERD. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analyzed group consisted of 78 children with gastroesophageal reflux disease. GERD was detected on the base of questionnaire, pH-metry and/or endoscopy. The questionnaire was conducted in all patients, 24-hour pH-metric examination in 47% and endoscopy in 53% children. Than omeprazole therapy was introduced (0.5-1.0 mg/kg daily). RESULTS: Before omeprazole therapy rebounding was observed in 94% children, heartburn in 84%, vomits in 38% and abdominal pain in 90% children. After 8 weeks of therapy analyzed symptoms were significantly reduced--rebounding was observed in 31% children, heartburn in 28% vomits in 5% and abdominal pain in 26% children. CONCLUSION: Omeprazole therapy is effective in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15190593&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec Stability of suspension formulations of lansoprazole and omeprazole stored in amber-colored plastic oral syringes.
DiGiacinto JL, Olsen KM, Bergman KL, Hoie EB.
Department of Biomedical and Therapeutic Sciences, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, USA.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the stability of lansoprazole and omeprazole suspensions at ambient and refrigerated temperatures using HPLC. DESIGN: The contents of lansoprazole and omeprazole capsules were suspended in separate flasks containing sodium bicarbonate 8.4% to concentrations of 3 and 2 mg/mL, respectively. The contents of each flask were drawn into six amber-colored oral syringes, with one-half of the syringes stored at 22 degrees C (ambient) and the other half at 4 degrees C. Lansoprazole and omeprazole concentrations were determined by a stability-indicating HPLC assay at baseline and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours, and on days 4, 7, 14, 21, 30, 45, and 60 after mixing. Both omeprazole and lansoprazole were considered stable if they retained > or =90% of the baseline drug concentration. RESULTS: Omeprazole was stable for up to 14 days at 22 degrees C and 45 days at 4 degrees C. Lansoprazole was stable for eight hours at 22 degrees C and for 14 days at 4 degrees C. CONCLUSIONS: When compared with ambient or refrigerated storage conditions, omeprazole was stable for a longer duration than lansoprazole. Pharmacists may use these results to guide compounding and storage of proton-pump inhibitor suspensions.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10852086&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec Role of gastric acid secretion in progression of acute gastric erosions induced by ischemia-reperfusion into gastric ulcers.
Brzozowski T, Konturek PC, Konturek SJ, Drozdowicz D, Kwiecien S, Pajdo R, Bielanski W, Hahn EG.
Department of Physiology, Jagiellonian University School of Medicine, 31-531, 16 Grzegorzecka Street, Cracow, Poland.
Ischemia followed by reperfusion is known to produce gastric lesions due to oxidative stress, but the role of gastric H(+) secretion in the formation of this mucosal injury remains unknown. We studied alterations in gastric acid secretion and gastric histamine content, as well as the expression of histidine-decarboxylase and interleukin-1beta during the mucosal recovery from ischemia-reperfusion erosions. Gastric secretion was studied in rats (series A) with gastric fistula before, during and after the ischemia induced by clamping of celiac artery for 0.5 h followed by reperfusion in animals pretreated with vehicle (saline), omeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, or ranitidine, a histamine (H(2)) receptor antagonist. In series B, the animals were submitted to 0.5 h of ischemia followed by 1 h of reperfusion and then anesthetized at 0, 3, 12 and 24 h or 3, 5, 10 or 15 days after the end of ischemia-reperfusion to determine gastric blood flow by H(2)-gas clearance technique, area of gastric lesions, plasma gastrin and interleukin-1beta levels, histamine content by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and expression of histidine-decarboxylase and interleukin-1beta mRNA by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Clamping of celiac artery caused cessation of gastric blood flow and almost complete suppression of basal gastric acid secretion (series A) that returned gradually to the control value at day 3 after ischemia-reperfusion, accompanied by the rise in plasma gastrin levels, pronounced expression of histidine-decarboxylase mRNA and increased mucosal histamine content. Ischemia, followed by 1 h of reperfusion, produced gastric erosions (series B) that reached maximum at 12 h, but then declined at 24 h. These erosions progressed at day 3 into deeper ulcers whose area declined progressively within the next 5-15 days. The gastric blood ceased to flow (series B) during 30 min of clamping and was reduced throughout the period of healing of acute erosions, being accompanied by a gradual rise in mucosal interleukin-1beta mRNA content and in plasma interleukin-1beta levels. Treatment with omeprazole or ranitidine, which completely suppressed gastric acid secretion and significantly raised plasma gastrin level, greatly reduced the formation of erosive lesions preventing the progression of these lesions to chronic gastric ulcers, and this was accompanied by the rise in gastric blood flow and plasma gastrin levels and the significant attenuation of plasma interleukin-1beta levels. The ranitidine and omeprazole-induced suppression of ischemia-reperfusion erosions were abolished by the instillation of exogenous 0.2 N HCl into the stomach of these rats. The histidine-decarboxylase was faintly expressed in the intact gastric mucosa, but strongly upregulated during mucosal recovery from the damage induced by ischemia-reperfusion. We conclude that following ischemia-reperfusion: (1) gastric acid secretion, gastric microcirculation and histamine production markedly decline, while interleukin-1beta release significantly increases, probably playing an important role in the progression of acute lesions into chronic gastric ulcerations; (2) the suppression of gastric acid secretion by omeprazole and ranitidine, that induces hypergastrinemia, prevents the progression of gastric erosions into ulcers; and (3) the addition of exogenous acid restores the progression of the acute lesions into gastric ulcers, indicating that gastric acid plays a key role in ulcerogenesis induced by ischemia-reperfusion.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10856459&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec Dissolution of omeprazole from delayed-release solid oral dosage forms.
Farinha A, Bica A, Martins JM, Pais JP.
Laboratorio de Estudos Farmaceuticos, Lisboa, Portugal.
The evaluation of the biopharmaceutical quality of omeprazole enteric-coated products (granules in capsules) with respect to its dissolution characteristics is not specifically regulated in any of the most common official pharmacopoeia. USP 23 includes a general monograph for enteric-coated products. This paper reports the evaluation of the medium pH effect on the dissolution rates of omeprazole from four omeprazole-containing products of different manufacturers. It is concluded that the USP 23 recommended dissolution procedure for enteric-coated products is not suitable due to the degradation of omeprazole under such conditions. Furthermore, the medium with pH 8.0 showed different dissolution rates not observed at pH 7.4, allowing discrimination between products of different manufacturers.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10872100&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec Studies on the mechanism of action of the gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase inhibitor SPI-447.
Tsukimi Y, Ushiro T, Yamazaki T, Ishikawa H, Hirase J, Narita M, Nishigaito T, Banno K, Ichihara T, Tanaka H.
Department of New Drug Research Laboratories, Shinnippon Pharmaceutical, Inc., Kishiwada, Japan.
3-Amino-5-methyl-2(2-methyl-3-thienyl)- imidazo[1,2-a]thieno[3,2-c]pyridine, SPI-447, is a potent gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase inhibitor, but a detailed mechanism of the inhibition is unknown. This study was designed to investigate the mechanism by which SPI-447 inhibits gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase. For this purpose, the inhibitory action of SPI-447 on gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase from porcine gastric mucosa was compared with that of omeprazole (an irreversible inhibitor) and SCH28080 (a reversible inhibitor). All compounds produced dose-dependent inhibition of gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase, and the inhibitory intensities were increased under acidic conditions. The anti-H+,K(+)-ATPase actions of SPI-447 and SCH28080 were attenuated by dilution, but not influenced by glutathione pretreatment. In contrast, that of omeprazole was not influenced by dilution, but was suppressed by glutathione pretreatment. KCl addition reversed the inhibition of H+,K(+)-ATPase-mediated H(+)-transport by SPI-447 and SCH28080, but had no effect on that by omeprazole. The anti-gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase action of SPI-447 was additive with that of SCH28080. SPI-447 and SCH28080 had no effect on Na+,K(+)-ATPase activity. These findings indicated that the inhibitory mechanism of SPI-447 on gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase was similar to that of SCH28080, but different from that of omeprazole; i.e., 1) reversible, 2) SH-group independent, 3) K(+)-competitive, and 4) highly specific against gastric H+,K(+)-ATPase.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10874584&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec Up-regulation of endothelin-1 in gastric mucosal inflammatory responses to Helicobacter pylori Lipopolysaccharide: effect of omeprazole and sucralfate.
Slomiany BL, Piotrowski J, Slomiany A.
Research Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Newark 07103-2400, USA. slomiabr umdnj.edu
BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori is recognized as a primary etiologic factor in the development of gastric disease and the product of particular significance to the virulent action of the bacterium is its cell wall lipopolysaccharide. We applied the animal model of H. pylori lipopolysaccharide-induced acute gastritis to study the effect of antiulcer agents, omeprazole and sucralfate, on the course of mucosal inflammatory responses by analyzing the interplay between the extent of epithelial cell apoptosis and the mucosal expression of endothelin-1 (ET-1), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha), and the activity of constitutive (cNOS) and inducible (NOS-2) nitric oxide synthase. METHODS: Rats pretreated twice daily for 3 consecutive days with omeprazole at 40 mg/kg, sucralfate at 100 mg/kg or the vehicle, were subjected to intragastric application of H. pylori lipopolysaccharide at 50 microg/animal, and after 2, 4, and 10 additional days on the antiulcer drug or vehicle regimen their mucosal tissue used for histologic and biochemical assessment. RESULTS: In the absence of antiulcer agents, H. pylori lipopolysaccharide elicited within 2 days a pattern of acute mucosal inflammatory responses accompanied by a massive epithelial cell apoptosis, a 2.9-fold increase in the mucosal expression of ET-1, an 11.7-fold enhancement in TNF-alpha, and a 9.3-fold increase in NOS-2, while cNOS activity showed a 5.5-fold decrease. The extent of mucosal inflammatory involvement reached a maximum by the 4th day and showed a decline by the 10th day. This was reflected in a marked reduction in epithelial cell apoptosis, decrease in the mucosal expression of ET-1, TNF-alpha and NOS-2, and the recovery in cNOS activity. Comparing to the vehicle controls, treatment with proton pump inhibitor, omeprazole, led at the end of a 10 day period to a 48.3% reduction in the extent of mucosal inflammatory involvement elicited by H. pylori lipopolysaccharide, while a 74.2% reduction in the mucosal inflammatory involvement was achieved with gastroprotective agent, sucralfate. Moreover, this advantage of sucralfate over omeprazole in countering the lipopolysaccharide-induced changes was reflected at the end of 10 day treatment period in a 20.4% greater decrease in apoptosis, a 47.5% greater reduction in TNF-alpha and a 50.7% greater reduction in ET-1. However, both agents exerted similar influence on the restoration of gastric mucosal cNOS activity and showed a comparable effect at the end of a 10 day treatment in countering the lipopolysaccharide-induced increase in the expression of NOS-2. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that an increase in the mucosal ET-1 level elicited by H. pylori lipopolysaccharide, combined with a decline in cNOS may be responsible for the induction of TNF-alpha and triggering the inflammatory process. We also show that sucralfate exhibits greater efficacy than omeprazole in suppressing the H. pylori-induced mucosal inflammatory responses. This property of sucralfate may well be due to its ability to suppress the mucosal rise in ET-1.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10898092&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
omeprazole, Prilosec Stereoselective metabolism of omeprazole by human cytochrome P450 enzymes.
Abelo A, Andersson TB, Antonsson M, Naudot AK, Skanberg I, Weidolf L.
AstraZeneca R&D Molndal, Molndal, Sweden. angela.abelo astrazeneca.com
This study demonstrates the stereoselective metabolism of the optical isomers of omeprazole in human liver microsomes. The intrinsic clearance (CL(int)) of the formation of the hydroxy metabolite from S-omeprazole was 10-fold lower than that from R-omeprazole. However, the CL(int) value for the sulfone and 5-O-desmethyl metabolites from S-omeprazole was higher than that from R-omeprazole. The sum of the CL(int) of the formation of all three metabolites was 14.6 and 42.5 microl/min/mg protein for S- and R-omeprazole, respectively. This indicates that S-omeprazole is cleared more slowly than R-omeprazole in vivo. The stereoselective metabolism of the optical isomers is mediated primarily by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19, as indicated by studies using cDNA-expressed enzymes. This is the result of a considerably higher CL(int) of the 5-hydroxy metabolite formation for R- than for S-omeprazole. For S-omeprazole, CYP2C19 is more important for 5-O-desmethyl formation than for 5-hydroxylation. Predictions of the CL(int) using data from cDNA-expressed enzymes suggest that CYP2C19 is responsible for 40 and 87% of the total CL(int) of S- and R-omeprazole, respectively, in human liver microsomes. According to experiments using cDNA-expressed enzymes, the sulfoxidation of both optical isomers is metabolized by a single isoform, CYP3A4. The CL(int) of the sulfone formation by CYP3A4 is 10-fold higher for S-omeprazole than for R-omeprazole, which may contribute to their stereoselective disposition. The results of this study show that both CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 exhibit a stereoselective metabolism of omeprazole. CYP2C19 favors 5-hydroxylation of the pyridine group of R-omeprazole, whereas the same enzyme mainly 5-O-demethylates S-omeprazole in the benzimidazole group. Sulfoxidation mediated by CYP3A4 highly favors the S-form.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10901708&dopt=Abstract omeprozole Prilosec
Prilosec (omeprazole) References
Prilosec or omeprazole 1 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 2 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 3 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 4 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 5 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 6 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 7 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 8 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 9 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 10 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 11 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 12 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 13 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 14 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 15 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 16 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 17 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 18 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 19 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 20 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 21 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 22 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 23 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 24 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 25 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 26 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 27 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 28 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 29 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 30 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 31 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 32 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 33 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 34 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 35 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 36 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 37 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 38 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 39 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 40 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 41 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 42 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 43 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 44 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 45 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 46 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 47 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 48 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 49 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 50 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 51 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 52 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 53 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 54 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 55 |
Prilosec or omeprazole 56
| |