buy Paxil




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites




paroxetine, Paxil
A comparison of the effects of different serotonin reuptake blockers on sexual behaviour of the male rat.

Mos J, Mollet I, Tolboom JT, Waldinger MD, Olivier B.

Department of Pharmacology, Solvay Pharmaceuticals, Weesp, The Netherlands.

In human males, SSRIs differentially affect (premature) ejaculation; paroxetine and fluoxetine markedly and sertraline, moderately inhibited ejaculation latency, whereas fluvoxamine did not inhibit this parameter (Waldinger, M.D., Hengeveld, M.W., Zwinderman, A.H., Olivier, B., The effect of SSRI antidepressants on ejaculation: a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study with fluoxetine, fluvoxamine, paroxetine and sertraline. J. Clin. Psychopharmacol. (in press)). The present studies tried to investigate, using sexual behaviour in male rats, whether such differences could also be found in animal paradigms of sexual behaviour. In a series of three experiments we compared various specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for their ability to suppress sexual behaviour in male rats. In the first experiment sexually experienced rats were tested 60 min after oral administration of clomipramine, fluvoxamine, fluoxetine (all in a range of 0, 3, 10 and 30 mg/kg p.o.), sertraline or paroxetine (both in a range of 0, 1, 3 and 10 mg/kg p.o.). Clomipramine, paroxetine and fluvoxamine did not significantly inhibit male sexual behaviour, although some trends were observed. Sertraline inhibited sexual behaviour at 3 and 10 mg/kg p.o., the effects being stronger at 3 mg/kg p.o. Fluoxetine (3 mg/kg p.o.) facilitated sexual behaviour, while at 30 mg/kg p.o. a modest increase in the postejaculatory interval was noted. In the second experiment, sexual behaviour of sexually naive male rats was slightly inhibited by paroxetine 10 mg/kg p.o., but sertraline (range 1-10 mg/kg p.o.), fluvoxamine and fluoxetine (both in a range of 3-30 mg/kg p.o.) were ineffective. In the last experiment the effects of paroxetine (0-10 mg/kg p.o.), fluvoxamine and fluoxetine (both 0-30 mg/kg p.o.) were studied during an exhaustion design in sexually experienced male rats. As rats get more 'sluggish' when they have had multiple ejaculations, we hoped to see stronger inhibitory effects in the last cycle prior to exhaustion. None of the drugs dose-dependently inhibited the pattern of sexual behaviour during the first sexual cycle. In the last cycle the patterning of sexual behaviour differed, but only paroxetine (10 mg/kg p.o.) inhibited sexual behaviour significantly. The total number' of ejaculations during the test was not reduced by any of the SSRIs tested. Contrary to human findings, we did not find major inhibitory effects of SSRIs on male rat sexual behaviour at non-sedative doses. The only differentiation that could be made is that paroxetine and sertraline had slightly stronger effects than the other 5-HT reuptake inhibitors. Masculine sexual behaviour in rats does not constitute a suitable model to investigate the differential mechanism of sexual inhibition of SSRIs that have been described in human males.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10082238&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Incidence and risk factors for hyponatraemia following treatment with fluoxetine or paroxetine in elderly people.

Wilkinson TJ, Begg EJ, Winter AC, Sainsbury R.

Department of Health Care of the Elderly, Princess Margaret Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand.

AIMS: To establish the incidence, time course and risk factors of hyponatraemia complicating treatment with fluoxetine or paroxetine in an elderly population. METHODS: Retrospective descriptive and case control study in an inpatient/outpatient assessment and rehabilitation service for people aged 65 years and over. Fourteen elderly patients with hyponatraemia complicating treatment with fluoxetine or paroxetine, matched with 56 controls drawn from 845 patients treated with fluoxetine or paroxetine over 3.5 years. No other SSRI antidepressants were used over the study period. RESULTS: The incidence of hyponatraemia was 4.7/1000 people treated/year (6.3/1000 for fluoxetine and 3.5/1000 for paroxetine). Hyponatraemia was detected at a median 13.5 (mean 18.6, range 4-64) days after commencing the drug. Mean (95% confidence intervals) body weights were lower in cases at 53.0 (95% CI 46.5-59.5) kg compared with controls at 64.5 (95% CI 60.1-68.4) kg (P<0.01). 71% of cases were women compared with 45% of controls (P=0.07) but the effect of gender was confounded by body weight. There were trends for cases to be older (odds ratio 1.10: 95% CI 0.99, 1.23) and lighter (odds ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.86, 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 1 in 200 elderly people treated per year with fluoxetine or paroxetine developed complicating hyponatraemia. Low body weight was a particular risk factor. Most cases occurred within 3 weeks of treatment.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10190657&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Determination of paroxetine in plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography for bioequivalence studies.

Lopez-Calull C, Dominguez N.

Hospital Sta. Creu i Sant Pau, Institut de Recerca, Barcelona, Spain.

A high-performance liquid chromatographic method is described for the determination of paroxetine in human plasma. Dibucaine was used as the internal standard. Paroxetine was isolated by solid phase extraction using a Bond-Elut C18 extraction column. Separation was obtained using a reversed-phase column under isocratic conditions with fluorescence detection. The sample volume was 500 microliters of plasma. The intra- and inter-assay accuracy and precision, determined as relative error and relative standard deviation, respectively, were less than 10%. The lower limit of quantitation, based on standards with acceptable relative error and relative standard deviation, was 10 ng ml-1. No endogenous compounds were found to interfere. The linearity was assessed in the range 5-100 ng ml-1. Stability of paroxetine during processing (autosampler) and in plasma was checked. This method proved suitable for bioequivalence studies following multiple doses in healthy volunteers.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10219683&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Increased cholesterol levels during paroxetine administration in healthy men.

Lara N, Baker GB, Archer SL, Le Melledo JM.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Despite the frequent use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD), their effects on plasma lipid levels have not been systematically investigated. Our objective was to assess the effects of 8 weeks of paroxetine administration on plasma cholesterol and triglyceride levels. METHOD: Blood samples were collected at baseline, after 8 weeks of paroxetine administration, and post-discontinuation in 18 healthy male volunteers. RESULTS: In the 16 of 18 patients whose plasma levels of paroxetine indicated an unequivocal compliance to treatment, paroxetine administration induced an 11.5% increase in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which normalized after paroxetine discontinuation. CONCLUSION: The magnitude of the paroxetine-induced increase in LDL-C would lead to a minor increase in CHD risk in a minority of healthy male volunteers without associated CHD risk factors but might increase LDL-C sufficiently to warrant therapeutic intervention in patients with established CHD, based on the National Cholesterol Education Program guidelines.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14728107&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Comparison of the effects of the selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors fluoxetine, paroxetine, citalopram and fluvoxamine in alcohol-preferring cAA rats.

Maurel S, De Vry J, Schreiber R.

CNS Research, Bayer AG, Cologne, Germany.

Clinical studies indicate that selective serotonin-reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may decrease alcohol intake and craving in particular subgroups of alcoholics. The aim of the present study was to compare the behavioral profile of various SSRIs in alcohol-preferring cAA rats, a genetic model of alcoholism. The effects of acute IP administration of fluoxetine (doses in mg/kg 1-10), citalopram (3-30), fluvoxamine (3-30) and paroxetine (1-10) on ethanol (EtOH) intake and preference, as well as food and total fluid intake, were determined in a 12-h access, water vs. 10% v/v EtOH two-bottle choice paradigm. Each compound reduced EtOH intake [Minimal Effective Doses (MEDs) 5, 10, 30 and 1 mg/kg for fluoxetine, citalopram, fluvoxamine, and paroxetine, respectively]. The degree of selectivity, that is, the extent to which reductions in EtOH intake could be separated from reductions in food and/or total fluid intake varied across the compounds. Thus, whereas EtOH intake was more markedly affected than food intake by fluoxetine, both parameters were equally affected by citalopram, and food intake was more markedly affected than EtOH intake by fluvoxamine and paroxetine. The anti-alcohol effect also differed with respect to specificity, that is, the degree to which effects on EtOH intake coincided with effects on EtOH preference. Whereas fluoxetine showed the highest level of specificity, followed by citalopram and fluvoxamine, the effect of paroxetine was nonspecific. The observed variation in the degree of selectivity and specificity of the anti-alcohol effect of SSRIs suggests that reductions in EtOH intake are not merely a consequence of a general suppressive effect on consummatory behavior. It is hypothesized that differences between the behavioral profiles of these compounds reflect a differential involvement of 5-HT receptor subtypes.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10231167&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Effects of (-)-tertatolol, (-)-penbutolol and (+/-)-pindolol in combination with paroxetine on presynaptic 5-HT function: an in vivo microdialysis and electrophysiological study.

Gartside SE, Clifford EM, Cowen PJ, Sharp T.

Oxford University Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Radcliffe Infirmary.

The antidepressant efficacy of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) might be enhanced by co-administration of 5-HT1A receptor antagonists. Thus, we have recently shown that the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, WAY 100635, blocks the inhibitory effect of an SSRI on 5-HT cell firing, and enhances its ability to elevate extracellular 5-HT in the forebrain. Here we determined whether the beta-adrenoceptor/5-HT1A receptor ligands (+/-)-pindolol, (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol, interact with paroxetine in a similar manner. Both (-)-tertatolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) and (-)-penbutolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) enhanced the effect of paroxetine (0.8 mg kg(-1) i.v.) on extracellular 5-HT in the frontal cortex, whilst (+/-)-pindolol (4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) did not. (-)-Tertatolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) alone caused a slight increase in 5-HT however, (-)-penbutolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) alone had no effect. In electrophysiological studies (-)-tertatolol (2.4 mg kg(-1) i.v.) alone had no effect on 5-HT cell firing but blocked the inhibitory effect of paroxetine. In contrast, (-)-penbutolol (0.1-0.8 mg kg(-1) i.v.) itself inhibited 5-HT cell firing, and this effect was reversed by WAY 100635 (0.1 mg kg(-1) i.v.). We have recently shown that (+/-)-pindolol inhibits 5-HT cell firing via a WAY 100635-sensitive mechanism. Our data suggest that (-)-tertatolol enhances the effect of paroxetine on forebrain 5-HT via blockade of 5-HT1A autoreceptors which mediate paroxetine-induced inhibition of 5-HT cell firing. In comparison, the mechanisms by which (-)-penbutolol enhances the effect of paroxetine on extracellular 5-HT is unclear, since (-)-penbutolol itself appears to have agonist properties at the 5-HT1A autoreceptor. Indeed, the agonist action of (+/-)-pindolol at 5-HT1A autoreceptors probably explains its inability to enhance the effect of paroxetine on 5-HT in the frontal cortex. Overall, our data suggest that both (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol are superior to (+/-)-pindolol in terms of enhancing the effect of an SSRI on extracellular 5-HT. Both (-)-tertatolol and (-)-penbutolol are worthy of investigation for use as adjuncts to SSRIs in the treatment of major depression.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10369467&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Onset of the effects of the 5-HT1A antagonist, WAY-100635, alone, and in combination with paroxetine, on olfactory bulbectomy and 8-OH-DPAT-induced changes in the rat.

Cryan JF, McGrath C, Leonard BE, Norman TR.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia.

5-HT1A receptor antagonists have recently been shown to accelerate the effects of some antidepressant drugs in clinical trials. In this study we investigate the effects of combining a full antagonist at the 5-HT1A receptor, WAY 100635 (0.2 mg/kg, SC) with the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) paroxetine (5 mg/kg. SC) in the olfactory bulbectomized (OB) rat, an animal model of chronic (but not acute) antidepressant activity. Ambulation scores were measured in the open-field apparatus, following 3, 7, and 14 days of treatment. Further to the OB study, we simultaneously studied adaptive changes in 5-HT1A receptor function, utilizing alterations in the hypothermic response to the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT. Paroxetine, in combination with WAY 100635, attenuated the hypothermic effects of 8-OH-DPAT as early as 3 days, with a full reversal evident following 7 days, whereas paroxetine, although attenuating the hypothermic effects in OB group by day 7, only reversed it fully after 14 days. Paroxetine alone and in combination with the antagonist reversed the olfactory bulbectomy-induced hyperactivity in the open field following 14 days of treatment only, this being the normal time of an "antidepressant" response in this model. However, there was no significant attenuation at any of the earlier time points. This further demonstrates that the reversal of this aspect of the olfactory bulbectomy-induced behavioral syndrome is insensitive to the potential faster onset of antidepressant action induced by 5-HT1A receptor antagonists. Nonetheless, WAY 100635, unlike previous studies with pindolol, did not interfere with the effects of the antidepressant in the model. The ability of the combination group to attenuate the hypothermic effects of 8-OH-DPAT faster than paroxetine alone, further emphasizes the role of the 5-HT1A receptor in the mechanism of action of antidepressants, and as a target for the development of faster acting antidepressants.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10371664&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR









Paxil or paroxetine References

paroxetine or Paxil Refs 1 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 2 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 3 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 4 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 5 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 6 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 7 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 8 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 9 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 10 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 11 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 12 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 13 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 14 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 15 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 16 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 17 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 18 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 19 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 20 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 21 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 22 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 23 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 24 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 25 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 26 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 27 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 28 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 29 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 30 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 31 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 32 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 33 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 34 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 35 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 36 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 37 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 38 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 39 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 40 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 41 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 42 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 43 paroxetine or Paxil Refs 44 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 45 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 46 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 47 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 48 | paroxetine or Paxil Refs 49



© DreamPharm.com