paroxetine, Paxil
Effects of Hypericum perforatum and paroxetine in the mouse defense test battery.

Beijamini V, Andreatini R.

Departamento de Farmacologia, Laboratorio de Fisiologia e Farmacologia do Sistema Nervoso Central, Centro Politecnico-Setor de Ciencias Biologicas, Universidade Federal do Parana, C.P. 19031, CEP: 81531-990, Curitiba, PR, Brazil.

Since (a) Hypericum perforatum shows anxiolytic-like effect in some animal models, (b) antidepressant drugs (AD) have been used as the main drug treatment for panic disorder (PD), (c) AD are also effective in generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and (d) H. perforatum exhibits antidepressant activity, it was hypothesized that H. perforatum might possess an antipanic-like and/or anxiolytic-like effect. Previous studies with the mouse defense test battery (MDTB) have suggested that this model may be useful for the investigation of anxiolytic-like and antipanic-like compounds. Thus, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of H. perforatum extract in the MDTB. The effect of acute, subchronic (7 days), and chronic (21 days) H. perforatum (150 and 300 mg/kg) extract administration was evaluated in mice submitted to the MDTB. Paroxetine (5 mg/kg), a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor with anxiolytic and antipanic effect, was used as a positive control. The results showed that 21 days of repeated administration of H. perforatum 300 mg/kg and paroxetine 5 mg/kg reduced flight reactions (number of avoidances, avoidance distance, and overall flight speed) to the presence of the predator. While the effect of paroxetine confirms that MDTB is useful for the detection of antipanic-like drugs, the effect of H. perforatum suggests a putative antipanic-like effect for this extract. Moreover, after 21 days of repeated administration, paroxetine increased the number of approaches/withdrawals and reduced the number of upright postures, suggesting a partial anxiolytic-like effect, while H. perforatum only reduced the number of upright postures. The present results suggest anxiolytic-like and antipanic-like effects of H. perforatum extract. However, it should be emphasized that the risk assessment (the main index of anxiety) was not affected by the extract, while the attack reactions were only weakly modified.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12667917&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Effect of different 5-HT1A receptor antagonists in combination with paroxetine on expression of the immediate-early gene Arc in rat brain.

Tordera R, Pei Q, Newson M, Gray K, Sprakes M, Sharp T.

University Department of Pharmacology, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3QT, UK.

Selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists enhance the effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) on presynaptic 5-HT function, and have potential as antidepressant augmentation therapies. The present study tested the effect of different selective 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists (WAY 100635, NAD-299, p-MPPI and LY 426965) in combination with a SSRI (paroxetine), on postsynaptic 5-HT function measured by increased expression of the immediate early gene, Arc.Paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.) combined with WAY 100635 (0.3 mg/kg s.c.) increased Arc mRNA in frontal, parietal and piriform cortices, and caudate putamen. Paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.) plus NAD-299 (1 or 5 mg/kg s.c.) had a similar effect. None of these drugs increased Arc mRNA when administered alone. Paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.) plus p-MPPI (8.5 mg/kg s.c.) also increased Arc mRNA but p-MPPI itself elevated Arc mRNA in many regions. Whilst LY 426965 (3 or 10 mg/kg s.c.) had no effect alone, when combined with paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.), the drug increased Arc mRNA in caudate putamen but not cortical regions.In conclusion, this study demonstrates that four 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists augment the effect of an SSRI on Arc mRNA expression, which is suggestive of increased postsynaptic 5-HT function. However, the data reveal certain differences in the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonists not recognised in models of presynaptic 5-HT function.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12726821&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Bi-phasic change in BDNF gene expression following antidepressant drug treatment.

Coppell AL, Pei Q, Zetterstrom TS.

University Department of Clinical Pharmacology, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK.

The gene for brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) has recently received attention in relation to the therapeutic action of antidepressant treatment. This study aimed to clarify the influence of post drug interval on the effect of acute and repeated treatment with antidepressant drugs on BDNF gene expression in the rat brain. It was found that repeated administration of either the monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine (TCP) or 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) re-uptake inhibitors (fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline), evoke a bi-phasic and time-dependent effect on BDNF gene expression in the rat hippocampus (especially dentate gyrus). A down-regulation of the BDNF gene was detected at 4 h (TCP and fluoxetine) and an up-regulation at 24 h (TCP, paroxetine, fluoxetine, sertraline) after the last of twice daily injections for 14 days. After a single injection the down-regulation was detected at 4 h (TCP, fluoxetine, paroxetine and sertraline) but BDNF mRNA levels were not altered at 24 h post drug (TCP, fluoxetine and paroxetine). Administration of inhibitors of noradrenaline re-uptake (desipramine and maprotiline) or the atypical antidepressant mianserin had no effect on BDNF mRNA levels at either single (4 h post drug, desipramine) or repeated (24 h post drug, desipramine, maprotiline, mianserin) treatment. The gene expression for NT-3, which is distributed in a high density in the dentate gyrus, was not affected by single or repeated injections of antidepressant drugs (TCP, fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, desipramine, maprotiline or mianserin) at 4 or 24 h post drug. In conclusion, these data show that the effect of antidepressant drugs on BDNF gene expression may be more complex and less widespread across treatments than previously thought. Thus, in this study drugs interacting with the central 5-HT system altered BDNF expression but the effect was bi-phasic over the 24 h post drug period.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12726822&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Serotonergic activity measured by platelet [3H]paroxetine binding in patients with eating disorders.

Ramacciotti CE, Coli E, Paoli R, Marazziti D, Dell'Osso L.

Department of Psychiatry, Pharmacology, Neurobiology and Biotechnologies, Section of Psychiatry, University of Pisa, Italy. c.ramacciotti ao-pisa.toscana.it

Most of the evidence from pharmacological studies supports the hypothesis of a serotonergic (5-HT) dysregulation in eating disorders (ED), though a specific alteration related to the major ED subtypes, anorexia (AN) and bulimia nervosa (BN), has not been identified yet, possibly because of changes over time in ED nosology. The aim of the present study was to verify whether differences in serotonergic activity, measured by platelet [3H]paroxetine binding, would validate current ED classification. Platelet [3H]paroxetine binding was investigated in 26 patients with eating disorders diagnosed in accord with DSM-IV criteria (AN, n=11; BN, n=15) and 26 normal weight controls of comparable age; ED symptomatology was assessed by the Diagnostic Schedule for Eating Disorders. ED patients had significantly lower B(max) values than controls (288.5+/-109.2 vs. 1396.8+/-251.3 fmol/mg), whereas the K(d) was not significantly altered (0.12+/-0.13 and 0.12+/-0.05 nM, respectively). Among patients, differences in B(max) were related neither to DSM-IV subtypes nor to clinical variables such as presence of binge-eating, purging, impulsive behaviors, or symptoms of depression. Although ED patients share a dysregulation in serotonergic activity, DSM-IV subtype classification was not validated by [3H]paroxetine binding, and hence does not correspond to a specific 5-HT profile.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12759159&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Use of Arc expression as a molecular marker of increased postsynaptic 5-HT function after SSRI/5-HT1A receptor antagonist co-administration.

Castro E, Tordera RM, Hughes ZA, Pei Q, Sharp T.

Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, University of Cantabria, Santander, Spain.

An increase in central postsynaptic 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) function activates expression of activity-related cytoskeletal protein (Arc). Here, Arc expression was used to test whether, in rats, co-administration of a 5-HT re-uptake inhibitor (paroxetine) and a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist (WAY 100635) increases postsynaptic 5-HT function. After pre-treatment with WAY 100635 (0.3 mg/kg s.c.), paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.) caused a threefold increase in 5-HT in prefrontal cortex microdialysates. In situ hybridization studies found that neither paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.) nor WAY 1000635 (0.3 mg/kg s.c.) altered Arc mRNA abundance in any region examined. In contrast, paroxetine (5 mg/kg s.c.) increased Arc mRNA after pre-treatment with WAY 100635 (0.3 mg/kg s.c.). This increase was apparent in cortical regions (frontal, parietal and cingulate) and caudate nucleus but was absent in hippocampus (CA1). Increases in Arc mRNA were accompanied by an increase in c-fos mRNA. The increase in Arc expression induced by paroxetine/WAY 100635 was abolished by the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor, p-chlorophenylalanine (300 mg/kg i.p., daily for two days). In conclusion, paroxetine and WAY 100635 injected in combination (but not alone) caused a region-specific, 5-HT-mediated increase in Arc expression. These data provide molecular evidence that co-administration of a 5-HT re-uptake inhibitor and 5-HT1A receptor antagonist increases 5-HT function at the postsynaptic level.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12787067&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Vardenafil reverses erectile dysfunction induced by paroxetine in rats.

Angulo J, Bischoff E, Gabancho S, Cuevas P, Saenz de Tejada I.

Fundacion para la Investigacion y el Desarrollo en Andrologia, Dept. de Investigacion, Hospital Ramon y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are associated with a high incidence of impotence. Paroxetine is an extensively used SSRI that has been shown to impair erectile function in patients, to induce erectile dysfunction and to inhibit nitric oxide synthase (NOS) activity and NO production in animal models. NO is a key mediator of penile erection. Vardenafil is a type 5 phosphodiesterase inhibitor that potentiates NO-mediated responses in isolated trabecular smooth muscle and penile erection in men in clinical trials. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of vardenafil on the impairment of erectile responses produced by paroxetine in the rat model. Application of cavernosal nerve electrical stimulation (CNES) produced frequency-related intracavernosal pressure (ICP) increases, which were inhibited by the NOS inhibitor N(G)-nitro-L-arginine (0.3 mg/kg) and potentiated by vardenafil (0.3 mg/kg). Acute paroxetine treatment (10 mg/kg) significantly reduced ICP-responses to CNES. This inhibition was completely reversed by vardenafil (0.3 mg/kg) administration. The results show that the erectile dysfunction induced by paroxetine in rats can be effectively treated with vardenafil, suggesting that the use of this compound could be a reasonable therapeutic approach to treating erectile dysfunction associated with SSRI administration.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12789386&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR



paroxetine, Paxil
Effects of chronic paroxetine treatment on dialysate serotonin in 5-HT1B receptor knockout mice.

Gardier AM, David DJ, Jego G, Przybylski C, Jacquot C, Durier S, Gruwez B, Douvier E, Beauverie P, Poisson N, Hen R, Bourin M.

Laboratoire de Neuropharmacologie EA3544 MENRT, Faculte de Pharmacie IFR75-ISIT Institut de Signalisation et d'Innovation Therapeutique, Universite Paris-Sud, Chatenay-Malabry, France. alain.gardier cep.u-psud.fr

The role of serotonin (5-HT)1B receptors in the mechanism of action of selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors (SSRI) was studied by using intracerebral in vivo microdialysis in conscious, freely moving wild-type and 5-HT1B receptor knockout (KO 5-HT1B) mice in order to compare the effects of chronic administration of paroxetine via osmotic minipumps (1 mg per kg per day for 14 days) on extracellular 5-HT levels ([5-HT]ext) in the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus. Basal [5-HT]ext values in the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus, approximately 20 h after removing the minipump, were not altered by chronic paroxetine treatment in both genotypes. On day 15, in the ventral hippocampus, an acute paroxetine challenge (1 mg/kg i.p.) induced a larger increase in [5-HT]ext in saline-pretreated mutant than in wild-type mice. This difference between the two genotypes in the effect of the paroxetine challenge persisted following chronic paroxetine treatment. Conversely, in the medial prefrontal cortex, the paroxetine challenge increased [5-HT]ext similarly in saline-pretreated mice of both genotypes. Such a challenge produced a further increase in cortical [5-HT]ext compared with that in saline-pretreated groups of both genotypes, but no differences were found between genotypes following chronic treatment. To avoid the interaction with raphe 5-HT1A autoreceptors, 1 micro m paroxetine was perfused locally through the dialysis probe implanted in the ventral hippocampus; similar increases in hippocampal [5-HT]ext were found in acutely or chronically treated wild-type mice. Systemic administration of the mixed 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist GR 127935 (4 mg/kg) in chronically treated wild-type mice potentiated the effect of a paroxetine challenge dose on [5-HT]ext in the ventral hippocampus, whereas systemic administration of the selective 5-HT1A receptor antagonist WAY 100635 did not. By using the zero net flux method of quantitative microdialysis in the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus of wild-type and KO 5-HT1B mice, we found that basal [5-HT]ext and the extraction fraction of 5-HT were similar in the medial prefrontal cortex and ventral hippocampus of both genotypes, suggesting that no compensatory response to the constitutive deletion of the 5-HT1B receptor involving changes in 5-HT uptake capacity occurred in vivo. As steady-state brain concentrations of paroxetine at day 14 were similar in both genotypes, it is unlikely that differences in the effects of a paroxetine challenge on hippocampal [5-HT]ext are due to alterations of the drug's pharmacokinetic properties in mutants. These data suggest that there are differences between the ventral hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex in activation of terminal 5-HT1B autoreceptors and their role in regulating dialysate 5-HT levels. These presynaptic receptors retain their capacity to limit 5-HT release mainly in the ventral hippocampus following chronic paroxetine treatment in mice.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12807420&dopt=Abstract paroxetine, Paxil, Paxil CR