citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Metabolism of citalopram enantiomers in CYP2C19/CYP2D6 phenotyped panels of healthy Swedes.

Herrlin K, Yasui-Furukori N, Tybring G, Widen J, Gustafsson LL, Bertilsson L.

Division of Clinical Pharmacology at Department of Medicine Laboratory, Karolinska Institutet at Huddinge University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden. karin.herrlin labtek.ki.se

AIMS: To investigate pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of citalopram (CT) and its metabolites desmethylcitalopram (DCT) and didesmethylcitalopram (DDCT) in Swedish healthy volunteers in relation to CYP2C19 and CYP2D6 geno- and phenotypes. METHODS: Racemic CT was given for seven days to panels with different genotypes and the following mephenytoin (Me) and debrisoquine (De) hydroxylation phenotypes: EMDe/EMMe, PMDe/EMMe, EMDe/PMMe (n = 6 in all groups), and one PMDe/PMMe subject. Blood sampling was carried out during day 7, and all urine was collected for 12 h after the last dose of CT. RESULTS: The AUC of S-CT was significantly higher in the EMDe/PMMe panel compared to the EMDe/EMMe and PMDe/EMMe panels (P < 0.05), whereas the AUC of R-CT did not differ between the panels. Similar differences, although they did not reach statistical significance, were noted for S-DCT and R-DCT. The enantiomers of DDCT were not quantifiable in PMDe, and there was no difference in DDCT enantiomer concentrations between the other two panels. A PMDe/PMMe subject stopped taking CT after five days due to severe adverse effects. Based on two time points, this subject had a very long CT half-life of 95 h. The value of 1.0 for the S/R ratio of the CT trough in this subject was similar to the mean S/R CT trough ratio of the EMDe/PMMe panel, but higher than the S/R CT ratio of the EMDe/EMMe panel (0.56; 95% CI 0.49-0.63) and the PMDe/EMMe panel (0.44; 95% CI 0.31-0.57). Thus the latter two phenotypes eliminated S-CT more rapidly via CYP2C19. An adverse effect described as an 'alcohol hangover' feeling was reported by one subject from each of the three panels. These individuals had the highest concentrations of both CT enantiomers. CONCLUSIONS: The AUC of S-, but not R-(CT) was found to be significantly higher in PM of mephenytoin compared to EMs, PMs may need a lower dosage of CT.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12968986&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro



citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Stereospecific determination of citalopram and desmethylcitalopram by capillary electrophoresis and liquid-phase microextraction.

Andersen S, Halvorsen TG, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Rasmussen KE, Tanum L, Refsum H.

School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1068 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway. solveig.andersen diakonsyk.no

A chiral capillary electrophoresis (CE) system allowing simultaneous enantiomer determination of citalopram (CIT) and its pharmacologically active metabolite desmethylcitalopram (DCIT) was developed. Excellent chiral separation was obtained using 1% sulfated-beta-cyclodextrin (S-beta-CD) as chiral selector in combination with 12% ACN in 25 mM phosphate pH 2.5. Samples were prepared by liquid-phase microextraction (LPME) based on a rodlike porous polypropylene hollow fibre. CIT and DCIT were extracted from 1 ml plasma made alkaline with NaOH, into dodecyl acetate impregnated in the pores of a hollow fibre, and into 20 mM phosphate pH 2.75, inside the hollow fibre. The acceptor solution was directly compatible with the CE system. Efficient sample clean-up was seen, and the recoveries were 46 and 29% for the enantiomers of CIT and DCIT, respectively, corresponding to 31 and 19 times enrichment. The limit of quantification (S/N=10) was <11.2 ng/ml, intra-day precision was <12.8% RSD, and inter-day precision was <14.5% RSD, for all enantiomers. The validated method was successfully applied to simultaneous determination of enantiomer concentrations of CIT and DCIT in plasma samples from nine patients treated with racemic citalopram. The results confirm LPME-CE as a suitable and promising tool for enantiomeric determination of chiral drugs and metabolites in biological matrices.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12972091&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro



citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Pharmacokinetics of citalopram in relation to genetic polymorphism of CYP2C19.

Yu BN, Chen GL, He N, Ouyang DS, Chen XP, Liu ZQ, Zhou HH.

Pharmacogenetics Research Institute, Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410078, Republic of China.

The study was designed to define the contribution of cytochrome p450 2C19 (CYP2C19) and cytochrome p450 3A4 (CYP3A4) to citalopram N-demethylation and to evaluate the relationship between the disposition of citalopram and CYP2C19 genotype. A single oral 40-mg dose of citalopram was administered to eight extensive metabolizers and five poor metabolizers recruited from 77 healthy Chinese volunteers whose genotypes and phenotypes were predetermined. The plasma concentrations of citalopram and desmethylcitalopram were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. It was found that the genotype of CYP2C19 had a significant effect on the N-demethylation of citalopram. Poor metabolizers with m1 mutation had higher area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC0--> infinity ) values than did extensive metabolizers. Terminal elimination half-life (t1/2) values of citalopram in poor metabolizers were significantly higher than the values in extensive metabolizers who were either homozygous or heterozygous with CYP2C19*1. The oral clearance (CLoral) of citalopram in poor metabolizers was significantly lower than that of extensive metabolizers. The AUC0--> infinity and maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of desmethylcitalopram in poor metabolizers were significantly lower than the values of extensive metabolizers. The results show that CYP3A4 is not the major enzyme in the N-demethylation of citalopram among extensive metabolizers. The polymorphism of CYP2C19 plays an important role in the N- demethylation of citalopram in vivo. The extensive metabolizers and poor metabolizers of CYP2C19 had significant difference in disposition of citalopram in vivo.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12975335&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro



citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Carbamazepine augmentation in depressive patients non-responding to citalopram: a pharmacokinetic and clinical pilot study.

Steinacher L, Vandel P, Zullino DF, Eap CB, Brawand-Amey M, Baumann P.

Praxis am Zweierplatz, Badenerstrasse 67, CH-8004 Zurich, Switzerland.

Citalopram is a chiral antidepressant drug. Its eutomer, S-citalopram (escitalopram), has recently been introduced as an antidepressant. In an open pilot study, four outpatients and two inpatients with a major depressive episode (ICD-10), and who were nonresponders to a 4-week pretreatment with 40-60 mg/day citalopram, were comedicated for another 4-week period with carbamazepine (200-400 mg/day). Some of the patients suffered also from comorbidities: Phobic anxiety disorder with panic attacks (n=2), generalised anxiety disorder, alcohol abuse, dependent personality disorder, hypertension (n=1). After a 4-week augmentation therapy with carbamazepine, a significant (P<0.03) decrease of the plasma concentrations of S-citalopram and R-citalopram, by 27 and 31%, respectively, was observed. Apparently, the probable induction of CYP3A4 by carbamazepine results in a nonstereoselective increase in N-demethylation of citalopram. Moreover, there was a significant (P<0.03) decrease of the ratio S/R-citalopram propionic acid derivative, the formation of it being partly regulated by MAO-A and MAO-B. Already, within 1 week after addition of carbamazepine, there was a slight but significant (P<0.03) decrease of the MADRS depression scores, from 27.0+/-7.7 (mean+/-S.D.) to 23.3+/-6.6, and the final score on day 56 was 18.8+/-10.9. The treatment was generally well tolerated. There was no evidence of occurrence of a serotonin syndrome. After augmentation with carbamazepine, treatment related adverse events were: Nausea in one case, diarrhea in one case, and rash in two cases. In conclusion, the results of this pilot study suggest that carbamazepine augmentation of a citalopram treatment in previous nonresponders to citalopram may be clinically useful, but that in addition carbamazepine can lead to a decrease of the plasma concentrations of the active enantiomer escitalopram.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12007677&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro



citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Potentiation of DOM-induced stimulus control by fluoxetine and citalopram: role of pharmacokinetics.

Eckler JR, Doat MM, Rabin RA, Winter JC.

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University at Buffalo, 102 Farber Hall, Buffalo, NY 14214-3000, USA. eckler buffalo.edu

The present investigation examined the interaction between 2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylamphetamine [DOM] and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor [SSRI] citalopram in rats trained with DOM [0.6 mg/kg; 75 min pretreatment time] as a discriminative stimulus. Pretreatment with citalopram at a dose of 1.0 mg/kg shifted the DOM dose response relationship to the left. Unlike previously tested SSRI's, the enhancement of DOM-induced stimulus control occurred in the absence of significant partial substitution by citalopram. DOM brain levels were measured using a GC-MS method both in the presence and absence of citalopram and fluoxetine in order to evaluate the pharmacokinetic contribution to the observed behavioral effect. The data indicated that fluoxetine but not citalopram significantly increased DOM brain levels. It is concluded that the effects of DOM as a discriminative stimulus are potentiated by the acute administration of citalopram and this effect is not mediated by additivity or pharmacokinetic mechanisms.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12106599&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro



citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
R-citalopram counteracts the antidepressant-like effect of escitalopram in a rat chronic mild stress model.

Sanchez C, Gruca P, Papp M.

Neuropharmacological Research, H. Lundbeck A/S, Copenhagen-Valby, Denmark. cs lundbeck.com

The selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor, citalopram, is a racemic mixture of the stereoisomers, S-(+)-citalopram (escitalopram) and R-(-)-citalopram (R-citalopram). R-citalopram has been shown to counteract the 5-HT enhancing properties of escitalopram in acute studies in animals. In the present study we report, for the first time, on an interaction between R-citalopram and escitalopram after repeated dosing in a rat chronic mild stress (CMS) model of depression. The effect of escitalopram (2.0, 3.9 and 7.8 mg/kg per day), R-citalopram (7.8 mg/kg per day) and escitalopram 3.9 mg/kg per day plus R-citalopram 7.8 mg/kg per day were studied and compared to the effect of citalopram (8.0 mg/kg per day), imipramine and R-fluoxetine (8.9 mg/kg per day). Significant effects relative to a vehicle-treated group were achieved from week 1 for escitalopram (3.9 and 7.8 mg/kg per day), from week 2 for citalopram (8.0 mg/kg per day), from week 3 for R-fluoxetine (8.9 mg/kg per day) and from week 4 for escitalopram (2.0 mg/kg per day) and imipramine (8.9 mg/kg per day). R-citalopram (7.8 mg/kg per day) and escitalopram (3.9 mg/kg per day) plus R-citalopram (7.8 mg/kg per day) did not differ significantly from vehicle. There were no drug-induced effects in non-stressed control groups. In conclusion, escitalopram showed a shorter time to response in the rat CMS model of depression than citalopram, which was faster acting than R-fluoxetine and imipramine. R-citalopram counteracted the effect of escitalopram. The mechanism of action of R-citalopram is, at the moment unclear, but may be relevant to the improved clinical antidepressant activity seen with escitalopram in comparison with citalopram, and may also indicate an earlier response to escitalopram compared to other selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs).

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14501259&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro



citalopram escitalopram Lexapro
Routine therapeutic drug monitoring in patients treated with 10-360 mg/day citalopram.

Le Bloc'h Y, Woggon B, Weissenrieder H, Brawand-Amey M, Spagnoli J, Eap CB, Baumann P.

University Department of Adult Psychiatry, CH-1008 Prilly-Lausanne, Switzerland.

From data collected during routine TDM, plasma concentrations of citalopram (CIT) and its metabolites demethylcitalopram (DCIT) and didemethylcitalopram (DDCIT) were measured in 345 plasma samples collected in steady-state conditions. They were from 258 patients treated with usual doses (20-60 mg/d) and from patients medicated with 80-360 mg/d CIT. Most patients had one or several comedications, including other antidepressants, antipsychotics, lithium, anticonvulsants, psychostimulants and somatic medications. Dose-corrected CIT plasma concentrations (C/D ratio) were 2.51 +/- 2.25 ng mL-1 mg-1 (n = 258; mean +/- SD). Patients >65 years had significantly higher dose-corrected CIT plasma concentrations (n = 56; 3.08 +/- 1.35 ng mL-1 mg-1) than younger patients (n = 195; 2.35 +/- 2.46 ng mL-1 mg-1) (P = 0.03). CIT plasma concentrations in the generally recommended dose range were [mean +/- SD, (median)]: 57 +/- 64 (45) ng/mL (10-20 mg/d; n = 64), 117 +/- 95 (91) ng/mL (21-60 mg/d; n = 96). At higher than usual doses, the following concentrations of CIT were measured: 61-120 mg/d CIT, 211 +/- 103 (190) ng/mL (n = 93); 121-200 mg/d: 339 +/- 143 (322) ng/mL (n = 70); 201-280 mg/d: 700 +/- 408 (565) ng/mL (n = 18); 281-360 mg/d: 888 +/- 620 (616) ng/mL (n = 4). When only one sample per patient (at the highest daily dose if repeated dosages) is considered, there is a linear and significant correlation (n = 48, r = 0.730; P < 0.001) between daily dose (10-200 mg/d) and CIT plasma concentrations. In experiments with dogs, DDCIT was reported to affect the QT interval when present at concentrations >300 ng/mL. In this study, DDCIT concentration reached 100 ng/mL in a patient treated with 280 mg/d CIT. Twelve other patients treated with 140-320 mg/d CIT had plasma concentrations of DDCIT within the range 52-73 ng/mL. In a subgroup comprised of patients treated with > or =160 mg/d CIT and with CIT plasma concentrations < or =300 ng/mL, and patients treated with < or =200 mg/d CIT and CIT plasma concentrations > or = 600 ng/mL, the enantiomers of CIT and DCIT were also analyzed. The highest S-CIT concentration measured in this subgroup was 327 ng/mL in a patient treated with 140 mg/d CIT, but the highest S-CIT concentration (632 ng/mL) was measured in patient treated with 360 mg/d CIT. In conclusion, there is a highly linear correlation between CIT plasma concentrations and CIT doses, well above the usual dose range.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=14508384&dopt=Abstract citalopram escitalopram Lexapro