|
sumatriptan, Imitrex Mechanism of actions of sumatriptan on coronary flow before and after endothelial dysfunction in guinea-pig isolated heart.
Ellwood AJ, Curtis MJ.
Department of Pharmacology, King's College, University of London.
1. The mechanism of action of sumatriptan on coronary flow was examined before and after two different forms of endothelial ablation in guinea-pig isolated hearts. The mechanism was assessed in terms of the influence of the integrity of the coronary endothelium, the role of release of nitric oxide (NO) from the endothelium, and the receptor subtypes mediating the effects. 2. Continuous perfusion with sumatriptan reduced coronary flow, but the concentration-response curve was v-shaped. Sumatriptan (0.001-0.1 microM) caused a concentration-dependent decrease in coronary flow with the maximum effect achieved at 0.23 +/- 0.04 microM. The pEC50 was 8.49 +/- 0.07. At higher concentrations (0.1-10 microM) there was a concentration-dependent diminution of the vasoconstrictor effect. Endothelial ablation by saponin removed the diminution in the vasoconstrictor effect. In contrast pretreatment with NG-nitro L-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME) (100 microM. 45 min perfusion) did not affect it. This was despite both saponin and L-NAME being effective in reducing basal release of NO into the coronary effluent (measured by chemiluminescence) to the same extent (71 +/- 3 and 73 +/- 2%, respectively). 3. GR127935, a selective 5-hydroxytryptamine1D (5-HT1D) receptor antagonist (3 and 10 nM), which by itself had no effect on coronary flow or NO release, antagonized the vasoconstrictor response to sumatriptan and unmasked a sumatriptan-induced concentration-dependent increase in coronary flow and NO release. These increases in coronary flow and NO release were abolished by pretreatment with either saponin or L-NAME. 4. Mesulergine, a 5-HT2 receptor antagonist which had no effect by itself on basal coronary flow or NO release, inhibited the vasodilator response to sumatriptan that occurred in the presence of GR127935, and actually enhanced the vasoconstrictor response, increasing the max mum fall in coronary flow from -3.9 +/- 0.4 to -5.2 +/- 0.4 ml min-1 g-1 (P < 0.05). The diminution of vasoconstrictor effect of sumatriptan was abolished by mesulergine and by pretreatment with saponin, but not by L-NAME. 5. In conclusion, guinea-pig coronary arteries constrict to low concentrations of sumatriptan, causing a reduction in coronary flow. This effect appears to be caused by 5-HT1D agonism with the receptors located on the coronary vascular smooth muscle. With higher concentrations of sumatriptan this is partially offset by a weaker vasodilator effect, which is caused by low affinity 5-HT2 agonism. Although this effect is endothelium-dependent. It is not caused by the release of NO. Interestingly, when the vasoconstrictor effect of sumatriptan was inhibited by the 5-HT1D antagonist GR127935, a high affinity vasodilator effect of sumatriptan was unmasked. This is 5-HT2 receptor mediated and is caused by release of NO from the coronary endothelium. 6. In man, sumatriptan, and 5-HT may both be capable of causing pathogenic coronary vasoconstriction. The implications of the present data are that the scope for this may depend greatly on (i) the extent of underlying endothelial dysfunction, (ii) the extent of endothelial 5-HT2 receptor-mediated release of vasodilator autacoids (which include NO) and (iii) the extent of smooth muscle 5-HT1D receptor-mediated vasoconstriction.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9134215&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
sumatriptan, Imitrex The 5-HT1D receptor antagonist GR-127,935 prevents inhibitory effects of sumatriptan but not CP-122,288 and 5-CT on neurogenic plasma extravasation within guinea pig dura mater.
Yu XJ, Cutrer FM, Moskowitz MA, Waeber C.
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown 02129, USA.
The aim of this study was to examine whether GR-127,935, a 5-HT1B/1D receptor antagonist, blocks the inhibitory effects of sumatriptan, CP-122,288 and 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) on plasma protein extravasation, within guinea pig and rat dura matter, following electric stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion. Binding studies first established that GR-127,935 shows a 500-fold selectivity for 5-HT1D binding sites (labeled by [3H]L-694,247) versus 5-HT1F binding sites (labeled by [3H]sumatriptan in the presence of 50 nM 5-carboxamidotryptamine) in guinea pig forebrain homogenates (pKD +/- SD = 7.0 +/- 0.2 at 5-HT1F sites and 9.7 +/- 0.1 at 5-HT1D sites). In guinea pigs, GR-127,935 showed partial agonist activity and inhibited dural plasma protein extravasation. Increasing doses of GR-127,935 reversed the effect of sumatriptan, but did not affect the action of 5-CT and CP-122,288 (at a dose as high as 2 mumol/kg). Sumatriptan, CP 122,288 and 5-CT dose-responsively inhibited plasma protein extravasation. At a dose of 2 mumol/kg (but not at 0.2 mumol/kg), GR-127,935 right-shifted the dose-response curve of sumatriptan. No significant rightward shift was observed in the dose-response of CP-122,288 and 5-CT. In rats, GR-127,935 did not show any significant partial agonist activity. A dose of 0.2 mumol/kg was sufficient to right-shift the dose-response curve of sumatriptan. These data suggest that sumatriptan inhibits neurogenic inflammation via 5-HT1D alpha receptors in guinea pigs and 5-HT1D beta (5-HT1B) receptors in rats. Additional receptor subtypes are likely to be involved in the inhibition of plasma extravasation by CP-122,288 and 5-CT. Pertussis toxin reduced the inhibitory effects of both sumatriptan and 5-CT, but not of muscimol, known to act at GABAA receptors. These results suggest that 5-CT, as well as sumatriptan, act at a receptor linked to an inhibitory G-protein.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9144644&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
sumatriptan, Imitrex Use of sumatriptan in Denmark in 1994-5: an epidemiological analysis of nationwide prescription data.
Gaist D, Andersen M, Aarup AL, Hallas J, Gram LF.
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, IMB, Odense University, Denmark.
AIMS: We describe the use of medication with symptomatic relief of migraine as specific indication by analysing prescription data from the entire Danish population in 1994 and 1995. METHODS: The data for sumatriptan were analysed at the level of the individual user. We used aggregated data for ergotamine drugs. RESULTS: Sumatriptan constituted 46% of the total amount of defined daily doses (DDD) sold and 94% of the total pharmacy retail price expenses in the drug-group studied. In total, 43389 users of sumatriptan were identified who presented 340148 prescriptions, corresponding to 2.2 million DDD of sumatriptan. The quarterly consumption increased by 50% during the study period. Tablets accounted for 92% of consumption. The 1 year period prevalence of use of sumatriptan among persons 16 years and older was 7.8 per 1000 in 1995 with a female to male prevalence ratio of 3.8:1. Use was most common in the age interval 35-54 years. Regional differences in use, which were not large, were positively correlated to the degree of urbanization. The incidence of use of sumatriptan was estimated at 3.6 per 1000 person-years. The intensity of use of sumatriptan varied greatly with 1.1% of patients (n = 507) using 60 DDD or more within 30 days at some time during the observation period. Long-term high use of tablets was common in this group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that sumatriptan had a considerable impact on the treatment of migraine with prescription drugs in Denmark. The underlying reasons for high use of the drug in a smaller fraction of the patients deserve further study.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9146856&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
sumatriptan, Imitrex Serotonergic functioning in children with oppositional defiant disorder: a sumatriptan challenge study.
Snoek H, van Goozen SH, Matthys W, Sigling HO, Koppeschaar HP, Westenberg HG, van Engeland H.
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, B01-201, University Medical Center Utrecht, PO Box 85500, Utrecht 3508 GA, The Netherlands.
BACKGROUND: Several studies support the notion that disturbances in the central serotonergic function are related to impulsive aggression. There is recent evidence from studies on 5-HT(1B) knock-out mice that this specific receptor is involved in impulsive aggressive behavior. The aim of the present study was to investigate 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor functioning in normal intelligent hospitalized children with oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). METHODS: The growth hormone (GH) response to a challenge with the 5-HT(1B/1D) agonist sumatriptan was examined in 20 children with an ODD, of whom 13 had an attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder comorbidity, and 15 normal control subjects (NC). Blood samples for growth hormone were collected repeatedly between 8:30 and 12:00 AM. Sumatriptan was administered at 10 AM. The effect of stress due to this procedure was assessed by measuring salivary cortisol. RESULTS: The GH response was significantly stronger in the children with ODD. After sumatriptan injection NC children showed a significant increase in cortisol; no such pattern was present in the ODD group. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that the postsynaptic 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor is functionally more sensitive in children with ODD.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11958783&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
sumatriptan, Imitrex Receptor specificity and trigemino-vascular inhibitory actions of a novel 5-HT1B/1D receptor partial agonist, 311C90 (zolmitriptan).
Martin GR, Robertson AD, MacLennan SJ, Prentice DJ, Barrett VJ, Buckingham J, Honey AC, Giles H, Moncada S.
Wellcome Research Laboratories, Beckenham, Kent.
1. 311C90 (zolmitriptan zomig: (S)-4[[3-[2-(dimethylamino)ethyl]-1H-indol-5-yl]methyl]-2-oxazolidinone) is a novel 5-HT1B/1D receptor agonist with proven efficacy in the acute treatment of migraine. Here, we describe the receptor specificity of the drug and its actions on trigeminal-evoked plasma protein extravasation into the dura mater of the anaesthetized guinea-pig. 2. At the "5-HT1B-like' receptor mediating vascular contraction (rabbit saphenous vein), the compound was a potent (p[A50] = 6.79 +/- 0.06) partial agonist achieving 77 +/- 4% of the maximum effect to 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT). In the same experiments, sumatriptan (p[A50] = 6.48 +/- 0.04) was half as potent as 311C90 and produced 97 +/- 2% of the 5-HT maximum effect. Studies in which receptor inactivation methods were used to estimate the affinity (pKA) and efficacy relative to 5-HT (tau rel) for each agonist confirmed that 311C90 exhibits higher affinity than sumatriptan (pKA = 6.63 +/- 0.04 and 6.16 +/- 0.03, respectively) and that both drugs are partial agonists relative to 5-HT (tau rel = 0.61 +/- 0.03 and 0.63 +/- 0.10, respectively, compared to 5-HT = 1.0). 3. Consistent with its effects in rabbit saphenous vein, 311C90 also produced concentration-dependent contractions of primate basilar artery and human epicardial coronary artery rings. In basilar artery, agonist potency (p[A50] = 6.92 +/- 0.07) was similar to that demonstrated in rabbit saphenous vein, again being 2-3 fold higher than for sumatriptan (p[A50] = 6.46 +/- 0.03). Both agonists produced about 50% of the maximum response obtained with 5-HT in the same preparations. In rings of human coronary artery, the absolute potency of 311C90 and sumatriptan was higher than in primate basilar artery (p[A50] = 7.3 +/- 0.1 and 6.7 +/- 0.1, respectively), but maximum effects relative to 5-HT were lower (37 +/- 8% and 35 +/- 7%, respectively). In both types of vessel, the inability of 5-HT1B/1D agonists to achieve the same maximum as the endogenous agonist 5-HT is explained by the additional presence of 5-HT2A receptors. 4. 311C90 displayed high affinity at human recombinant 5-HT1D (formerly 5-HT1D alpha) and 5-HT1B (formerly 5-HT1D beta) receptors in transfected CHO-K1 cell membranes (pIC50 values = 9.16 +/- 0.12 and 8.32 +/- 0.09, respectively). In intact cells, the drug produced concentration-dependent inhibition of forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase (p[A50] = 9.9 and 9.5, respectively) achieving the same maximum effect as 5-HT. Excepting human recombinant 5-HT1A and 5-ht1F receptors at which the drug behaved as an agonist with modest affinity (pIC50 = 6.45 +/- 0.11 and 7.22 +/- 0.12, respectively), 311C90 exhibited low, or no detectable affinity (pKi or pKB < or = 5.5) at numerous other monoamine receptors, including other 5-HT receptor subtypes. 5. When administered to anaesthetized guinea-pigs ten minutes before unilateral electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion (1.2 mA, 5 Hz, 5 ms, 5 min), 311C90 (3-30 micrograms kg-1, i.v.) caused a dose-dependent inhibition of [125I]-albumin extravasation within the ipsilateral dura mater. At the same doses, the drug also produced dose-dependent falls in cranial vascular conductance (32.3 +/- 7.5% at 30 micrograms kg-1), as measured in the ear by laser doppler flowmetry. 6. These results show that 311C90, a novel member of the 5-HT1B/1D agonist drug class, exhibits a high degree of pharmacological specificity. Its potent partial agonist action at "5-HT1B-like' receptors in intracranial arteries, coupled with potent agonism at 5-HT1D and 5-HT1B receptors and an ability to inhibit neurogenic plasma protein extravasation in the dura, are consistent with its utility as an effective acute treatment for migraine.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9154322&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
sumatriptan, Imitrex Effect of a serotonin agonist (sumatriptan) on the peptidergic innervation of the rat cerebral dura mater and on the expression of c-fos in the caudal trigeminal nucleus in an experimental migraine model.
Knyihar-Csillik E, Tajti J, Samsam M, Sary G, Slezak S, Vecsei L.
Department of Clinical Neurology, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi University Medical School, Szeged, Hungary. knyihar nepsy.szote.u-szeged.hu
The supratentorial cerebral dura of the albino rat is equipped with a rich sensory innervation including nociceptive axons and their terminals, which display intense calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) immunoreactivity both in the connective tissue and around blood vessels. Stereotactic electrical stimulation of the trigeminal (Gasserian) ganglion, regarded as an experimental migraine model, induces marked increase and disintegration of club-like perivascular CGRP-immunopositive nerve endings in the dura. Intravenous administration of sumatriptan, prior to electrical stimulation, prevents disintegration of perivascular terminals and induces accumulation of CGRP in terminal and preterminal portions of peripheral sensory axons. Consequently, immunopositive terminals and varicosities increase in size; accumulation of axoplasmic organelles results in a "hollow" appearance of many varicosities. Since sumatriptan exerts its anti-migraine effect by virtue of its agonist action on 5-HT1D receptors, we suggest that sumatriptan prevents the release of CGRP from dural perivascular terminals by an action at 5-HT1D receptors. In the caudal trigeminal nucleus electrical stimulation of the trigeminal ganglion induces, in interneurons, increased expression of the oncoprotein c-fos which is not prevented by intravenous application of sumatriptan. Disparate findings regarding this effect are partly due to the fact that sumatriptan very poorly passes the blood-brain barrier and partly to different experimental paradigms used by different authors.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9185668&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
sumatriptan, Imitrex Sumatriptan inhibits neurogenic vasodilation of dural blood vessels in the anaesthetized rat--intravital microscope studies.
Williamson DJ, Hargreaves RJ, Hill RG, Shepheard SL.
Department of Pharmacology, Merck Sharp and Dohme Research Laboratories, Neuroscience Research Centre, Harlow, Essex, UK.
This study used intravital microscopy to measure the diameter of dural arteries in anaesthetized rats. Electrical stimulation of the surface of a closed cranial window produced increases in dural vessel diameter which were blocked by the CGRP receptor antagonist human-alpha CGRP(8-37) but unaffected by the NK1 receptor antagonist RP67580. Sumatriptan (3 and 10 mg kg-1, i.v.) significantly reduced the response to electrical stimulation. In contrast, sumatriptan (3 mg kg-1) had no effects on the response to exogenously administered CGRP. These results indicate that neurokinins play no role in neurogenic vasodilation in this preparation and that neurogenic vasodilation in rat dural vessels is mediated predominantly by CGRP. Furthermore, the data indicate that sumatriptan attenuates neurogenic vasodilation, probably by inhibiting the release of CGRP from perivascular trigeminal nerve endings innervating the dura. These experimental data parallel the clinical findings that CGRP levels are elevated in migraine and normalized, concomitantly with headache relief, by sumatriptan.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9209774&dopt=Abstract sumatriptan Imitrex
Imitrex (sumatriptan) References
Imitrex or sumatriptan 1 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 2 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 3 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 4 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 5 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 6 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 7 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 8 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 9 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 10 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 11 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 12 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 13 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 14 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 15 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 16 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 17 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 18 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 19 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 20 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 21 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 22 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 23 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 24 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 25 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 26 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 27 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 28 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 29 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 30 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 31 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 32 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 33 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 34 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 35 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 36 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 37 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 38 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 39 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 40 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 41 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 42 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 43 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 44 |
Imitrex or sumatriptan 45
| |