|
venlafaxine (Effexor) High-performance liquid chromatographic method to screen and quantitate seven selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in human serum.
Tournel G, Houdret N, Hedouin V, Deveau M, Gosset D, Lhermitte M.
Institut de Medecine Legale de Lille, Faculte de Medecine, Universite de Lille II, France.
A high-performance liquid chromatographic screening method (HPLC) is described for the determination of seven selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (fluvoxamine, milnacipran, paroxetine, sertraline, fluoxetine, citalopram, venlafaxine) and for three pharmacologically active N-demethylated metabolites (desmethylcitalopram, didesmethylcitalopram and norfluoxetine). A tricyclic antidepressant, clomipramine, was used as an internal standard. The method consists of liquid extraction of serum after alcalinisation at pH 9.50, followed by chromatography on a Beckman C18 reversed-phase column. Compounds were detected at 200.4 nm. The standard curves were linear over a working range of 50-1,000 ng/ml for fluvoxamine, 15-1,000 ng/ml for fluoxetine, 25-500 ng/ml for norfluoxetine, 50-500 ng/ml for sertraline, 20-500 ng/ml for paroxetine, 25-550 ng/ml for citalopram, 25-750 ng/ml for desmethylcitalopram, 25-800 ng/ml for didesmethylcitalopram, 25-650 ng/ml for milnacipran, and 25-500 ng/ml for venlafaxine. The quantitation limits of the method were 15 ng/ml for fluoxetine, 20 ng/ml for paroxetine, 25 ng/ml for venlafaxine, norfluoxetine and citalopram, and its metabolites, 40 ng/ml for sertraline and 50 ng/ml for fluvoxamine. No interferences were noted with this sensitive and specific method which can be used for therapeutic drug monitoring.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11587344&dopt=Abstract venlafaxine Effexor refs Effexor, Effexor XR
venlafaxine (Effexor) A multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation of acute major depressive disorder (MDD): a comparison of cost-effectiveness between venlafaxine, SSRIs and TCAs.
Doyle JJ, Casciano J, Arikian S, Tarride JE, Gonzalez MA, Casciano R.
Columbia University, School of Public Health, New York, NY, USA. jdoyle groupanalytica.com
METHODS: We conducted a multinational pharmacoeconomic evaluation comparing the immediate release form of a new class of serotonin norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), venlafaxine IR to the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and the tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) in the treatment of acute major depressive disorder (MDD) in 10 countries (Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, and Venezuela). We designed a decision analytic model assessing the acute phase of MDD treatment within a 6-month time horizon. Six decision tree models were customized with country-specific estimates from a clinical management analysis, meta-analytic rates from two published meta-analyses, and a resource valuation of treatment costs representing the inpatient and outpatient settings within each country. The meta-analyses provided the clinical rates of success defined as a 50% reduction in depression scores on the Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) or the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Treatment regimen costs were determined from standard lists, fee schedules, and communication with local health economists in each country. The meta-analytic rates were applied to the decision analytic model to calculate the expected cost and expected outcomes for each antidepressant comparator. Cost-effectiveness was determined using the expected values for both a successful outcome, and a composite measure of outcome termed symptom-free days. A policy analysis was conducted to examine the health system budget impact in each country of increasing the utilization of the most effective antidepressant found in our study. RESULTS: Initiating treatment of MDD with venlafaxine IR yielded a lower expected cost compared to the SSRIs and TCAs in all countries except Poland in the inpatient setting, and Italy and Poland within the outpatient settings. The weighted average expected cost per patient varied from US$632 (Poland) to US$5647 (US) in the six-month acute phase treatment of MDD. The estimated total budgetary impact for each 1% of venlafaxine utilization, assuming a population of one million MDD patients, ranged from US$1600 (Italy) to US$29,049 (US). CONCLUSIONS: Within the inpatient and outpatient treatment settings, venlafaxine IR was a more cost-effective treatment of MDD compared to the SSRIs and TCAs. Additionally, the results of this investigation indicate that increased utilization of venlafaxine in most settings across Europe and the Americas will have favorable impact on health care payer budgets. ADR, adverse drug reaction; CMA, clinical management analysis; ECT, electroconvulsive therapy; HAM-D, Hamilton Depression Scale; MADRS, Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale; MDD, major depressive disorder; SFD, symptom-free day; SNRI, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor; SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA, tricyclic antidepressant; WHO, world health organization.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11704969&dopt=Abstract venlafaxine Effexor refs Effexor, Effexor XR
venlafaxine (Effexor) Comparative affinity of duloxetine and venlafaxine for serotonin and norepinephrine transporters in vitro and in vivo, human serotonin receptor subtypes, and other neuronal receptors.
Bymaster FP, Dreshfield-Ahmad LJ, Threlkeld PG, Shaw JL, Thompson L, Nelson DL, Hemrick-Luecke SK, Wong DT.
Neuroscience Research Division, Lilly Research Laboratories, Lilly Corporate Center, Indianapolis, IN 46285-0510, USA. fbymaster lilly.com
The blockade of serotonin (5-HT) and norepinephrine (NE) transporters in vitro and in vivo by the dual 5-HT/NE reuptake inhibitors duloxetine and venlafaxine was compared. Duloxetine inhibited binding to the human NE and 5-HT transporters with K(i) values of 7.5 and 0.8 nM, respectively, and with a K(i) ratio of 9. Venlafaxine inhibited binding to the human NE and 5-HT transporters with K(i) values of 2480 and 82 nM, respectively, and with a K(i) ratio of 30. Duloxetine inhibited ex vivo binding to rat 5-HT transporters and NE transporters with ED(50) values of 0.03 and 0.7 mg/kg, respectively, whereas venlafaxine had ED(50) values of 2 and 54 mg/kg, respectively. The depletion of rat brain 5-HT by p-chloramphetamine and depletion of rat hypothalamic NE by 6-hydroxydopamine was blocked by duloxetine with ED(50) values of 2.3 and 12 mg/kg, respectively. Venlafaxine had ED(50) values of 5.9 and 94 mg/kg for blocking p-chloramphetamine- and 6-hydroxydopamine-induced monoamine depletion, respectively. Thus, duloxetine more potently blocks 5-HT and NE transporters in vitro and in vivo than venlafaxine.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11750180&dopt=Abstract venlafaxine Effexor refs Effexor, Effexor XR
venlafaxine (Effexor) The reductions in sweetened milk intake induced by interleukin-1 and endotoxin are not prevented by chronic antidepressant treatment.
Dunn AJ, Swiergiel AH.
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, Shreveport, LA 71130-3932, USA. adunn lsuhsc.edu
Administration of interleukin-1 (IL-1) and endotoxin (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) to rodents can decrease food intake, a behavioral response resembling the diminution of appetite observed in human depression. IL-1 and LPS are known to affect cerebral neurotransmission involving norepinephrine and serotonin, both of which have been implicated in feeding behavior and in the pharmacotherapy of depression in man. The ability of chronic antidepressant treatment to attenuate LPS-induced depressed feeding in rats has been cited as evidence that cytokines may be involved in human depression. Thus, we studied the effects of chronic treatment with the tricyclic antidepressant, imipramine, and the novel antidepressant, venlafaxine, on the sweetened milk intake challenged with intraperitoneally injected IL-1 beta and LPS. Chronic (from 2 to 8 weeks) treatment of the mice with imipramine (10 mg/kg once or twice daily) or venlafaxine (10 and 20 mg/kg/day) did not significantly alter the decreases in milk intake in response to mIL-1 beta or LPS. In some experiments, chronic imipramine slightly decreased body weight and slightly increased milk intake, but not food pellet intake. Venlafaxine had none of these effects. Analysis of variance did not indicate any significant interactions between the antidepressant and IL-1 or LPS treatments. These results indicate that chronic treatment with antidepressants does not significantly alter the responses to IL-1 or LPS in the mouse sweetened milk model of sickness behavior. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11752890&dopt=Abstract venlafaxine Effexor refs Effexor, Effexor XR
venlafaxine (Effexor) Sertralilne, paroxetine and venlafaxine in refugee post traumatic stress disorder with depression symptoms.
Smajkic A, Weine S, Duric-Bijedic Z, Boskailo E, Lewis J, Pavkovic I.
Project on Genocide, Psychiatry and Witnessing, Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
The authors describe the use of three new antidepressants: Sertralilne, Paroxetine and Venlafaxine in treating Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and symptoms of Depression in adult Bosnian refugees victims of ethnic cleansing. 32 Bosnian refugees with PTSD and symptoms of Depression presenting for treatment of the mental health consequences of surviving ethnic cleansing, participated in a case series study. All subjects completed open trials of Sertraline (15), Paroxetine (12) or Venlafaxine (5), with standard clinical doses. Overall, Sertraline and Paroxetine yielded statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks in the total PTSD symptom severity, in each symptom cluster, in Beck Depression Inventory and in Global Assessment of Functioning. Venlafaxine produced statistically significant improvement at 6 weeks in the total PTSD symptom severity, in each symptom cluster and in Global Assessment of Functioning but did not yield significant improvement in symptoms of depression and had a high rate of side effects.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11795192&dopt=Abstract venlafaxine Effexor refs Effexor, Effexor XR
Venlafaxine or Effexor References
Effexor (venlafaxine) 1 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 2 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 3 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 4 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 5 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 6 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 7 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 8 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 9 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 10 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 11 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 12 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 13 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 14 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 15 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 16 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 17 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 18 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 19 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 20 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 21 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 22 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 23 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 24 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 25 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 26 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 27 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 28 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 29 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 30 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 31 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 32 |
Effexor (venlafaxine) 33
| |