buy Diflucan




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites




Diflucan
Effect of fluconazole on fungicidal activity of flucytosine in murine cryptococcal meningitis.

Larsen RA, Bauer M, Weiner JM, Diamond DM, Leal ME, Ding JC, Rinaldi MG, Graybill JR.

Department of Medicine (Infectious Diseases), University of Southern California, Los Angeles 90033, USA.

Both animal and in vitro studies have demonstrated that combinations of flucytosine with amphotericin B and with fluconazole have significantly improved activity against cryptococcal meningitis compared with the activity of each drug used alone. However, very few dose levels of these agents have been tested in combination. This study evaluated the efficacy of fluconazole plus flucytosine in a murine model of cryptococcal meningitis over a broad range of dose combinations (fluconazole, 0 to 40 micrograms/g of body weight per day; flucytosine, 0 to 200 micrograms/g/day). Both drugs were dissolved in drinking water, with treatment on days 2 to 11. In this highly reproducible model, fluconazole had a dramatic effect on the fungicidal activity of flucytosine. Flucytosine at dose levels of as much as 200 micrograms/g/day alone or in combination with low doses of fluconazole had minimal fungicidal activity, whereas in combination with fluconazole at 24 to 40 micrograms/g/day, flucytosine showed fungicidal activity in the range of 45 to 65% of the animals treated at doses of 40 to 100 micrograms/g/day. This striking effect of fluconazole is consistent with the results of both in vitro and clinical studies. In the clinic, the use of flucytosine is often limited by severe toxicity, while toxicity is rarely observed with fluconazole. These results suggest that when flucytosine is given with higher doses of fluconazole, the maximum therapeutic effect of the former in the clinic may be observed at dose levels that are far less than the doses commonly employed (150 micrograms/g daily).

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8878602&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
Oropharyngeal yeast flora and fluconazole resistance in HIV-infected patients receiving long-term continuous versus intermittent fluconazole therapy.

Heald AE, Cox GM, Schell WA, Bartlett JA, Perfect JR.

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of continuous versus intermittent fluconazole therapy on fungal colonization and fluconazole resistance in the oropharynx of HIV-infected patients. DESIGN: Case-control study. SETTING: Duke University Adult Infectious Diseases Clinic, a tertiary referral center in North Carolina which provides care for 700 HIV-infected persons. PATIENTS: Nineteen HIV-infected patients on daily continuous fluconazole for a minimum of 6 months and eleven HIV-infected patients on intermittent fluconazole for a minimum of 6 months were matched by sex and CD4 cell count to HIV-infected patients who had not received fluconazole in the preceding 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fungal isolation and fluconazole susceptibility testing were performed on oral saline rinses from each patient. RESULTS: The patients taking continuous fluconazole were more likely than matched controls to have had sterile mouth rinses (14 out of 19 versus five out of 19; P < 0.001), and the yeasts that were isolated were more likely than matched controls to be non-Candida albicans species and to have minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) to fluconazole > or = 16 micrograms/ml. None of these isolates were associated with symptoms. In contrast, none of the patients in the intermittent fluconazole group had sterile cultures. When this group was compared to controls, they were more likely to have had non-C. albicans species, and the C. albicans isolates obtained had higher MIC to fluconazole. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term continuous therapy with fluconazole may prevent the appearance of Candida in the oral cavity. This finding may reduce recurrence rates and might favorably impact on the clinical appearance of mucosal candidiasis with resistant C. albicans.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8882665&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
The cardiopulmonary, eicosanoid, and tissue microanatomic effects of fluconazole during graded bacteremia.

Salartash K, Gallucci J, Quinn J, Catalano E, Slotman G.

Department of Surgery, Cooper Hospital/University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Camden 08103, USA.

Imidazole compounds have been shown to be beneficial in systemic sepsis and inflammation. The purpose of this study was to delineate the effects of fluconazole on systemic hemodynamics and on microanatomy of the heart, lung, liver, and kidney parenchyma of swine during graded bacteremia. Eighteen adult swine were studied in three groups: 1), anesthesia control; 2), septic control (Aeromonas hydrophila, 10(9)/mL, infused i.v. for 4 h); 3) fluconazole (fluconazole, 30 mg/kg i.v., followed by A. hydrophila infusion). After 4 h of graded bacteremia, autopsy was performed. Compared with the septic control group, cardiac index, oxygen delivery, and oxygen consumption were reduced significantly after fluconazole pretreatment, and mixed venous hemoglobin oxygen saturation (SVO2) and oxygen extraction were increased. Plasma thromboxane A2 and leukotriene levels were not affected by fluconazole. Computerized digital image analysis of the liver, heart, and kidney specimens revealed no statistically significant differences between the septic control group and fluconazole-pretreated animals. In the lung specimens, preinfusion of fluconazole decreased alveolar wall thickness in septic swine (anesthesia control group: 8.15 x 10(-3) +/- 1.3 x 10(-3)mm versus septic control group: 9.9 x 10(-3) +/- 1.3 x 10(-4) versus fluconazole group: 6.8 x 10(-3) +/- 1.6 x 10(-3); p < or = .05). Fluconazole pretreatment before graded bacteremia has no beneficial effect on cardiopulmonary performance or septic tissue edema of the heart, kidney, or liver. Tissue oxygen metabolism might be down-regulated by fluconazole. However, preinfusion of fluconazole appears to normalize the sepsis-induced increase in pulmonary alveolar wall thickness. The net significance of these changes on clinical outcome is not clear from these data.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8885087&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
A randomized, double-blind trial of anidulafungin versus fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis.

Krause DS, Simjee AE, van Rensburg C, Viljoen J, Walsh TJ, Goldstein BP, Wible M, Henkel T.

Vicuron Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania 19406, USA. dkrause vicuron.com

Anidulafungin is a novel antifungal agent of the echinocandin class. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous anidulafungin to that of oral fluconazole in 601 patients with endoscopically and microbiologically documented esophageal candidiasis. Patients received intravenous anidulafungin (100 mg on day 1, followed by 50 mg per day) or oral fluconazole (200 mg on day 1, followed by 100 mg per day) for 7 days beyond resolution of symptoms (range, 14-21 days). At the end of therapy, the rate of endoscopic success for anidulafungin (242 [97.2%] of 249 treated patients) was found to be statistically noninferior to that for fluconazole (252 [98.8%] of 255 treated patients; treatment difference, -1.6%; 95% confidence interval, -4.1 to 0.8). The safety profile of anidulafungin was similar to that of fluconazole; treatment-related adverse events occurred in 9.3% and 12.0% of patients, respectively. Laboratory parameters were similar between treatment arms. Anidulafungin is as safe and effective as oral fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis, when assessed at the completion of therapy.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15472806&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
In vitro and in vivo antifungal activities of ER-30346, a novel oral triazole with a broad antifungal spectrum.

Hata K, Kimura J, Miki H, Toyosawa T, Nakamura T, Katsu K.

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan.

ER-30346 is a novel oral triazole with a broad spectrum of potent activity against a wide range of fungi. ER-30346, with MICs at which 90% of the strains tested are inhibited (MIC90s) ranging from 0.025 to 0.78 microgram/ml, was 4 to 32 times more active than itraconazole, fluconazole, and amphotericin B against Candida albicans, Candida parapsilosis, and Candida glabrata. Against Candida tropicalis, ER-30346, with an MIC90 of 12.5 micrograms/ml, was 2 to > 8 times more active than itraconazole and fluconazole, but was 16 times less active than amphotericin B. ER-30346 (MIC90, 0.78 microgram/ml) was four to eight times more active than fluconazole and amphotericin B and had activity comparable to that of itraconazole against Trichosporon beigelli. The MIC90s of ER-30346 were 0.10 microgram/ml for Cryptococcus neoformans and 0.39 microgram/ml for Aspergillus fumigatus. ER-30346 was 2 to 8 times more active than itraconazole and amphotericin B and 32 to > 256 times more active than fluconazole. ER-30346 also showed good activity against dermatophytes, with MICs ranging from 0.05 to 0.39 microgram/ml, and its activity was comparable to or 2 to 16 times higher than those of itraconazole and amphotericin B and > 32 times higher than that of fluconazole. In vivo activity was evaluated with systemic infections in mice. Against systemic candidiasis and cryptococcosis, ER-30346 was comparable in efficacy to fluconazole and was more effective than itraconazole. Of the drugs tested, ER-30346 was the most effective drug against systemic aspergillosis. We studied the levels of ER-30346 in mouse plasma. The maximum concentration of drug in plasma and the area under the concentration-time curve for ER-30346 showed good linearity over a range of doses from 2 to 40 mg/kg of body weight.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8891121&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
Efficacy of ER-30346, a novel oral triazole antifungal agent, in experimental models of aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis.

Hata K, Kimura J, Miki H, Toyosawa T, Moriyama M, Katsu K.

Department of Microbiology and Infectious Disease, Tsukuba Research Laboratories, Eisai Co., Ltd., Ibaraki, Japan.

ER-30346 is a novel oral triazole with a broad spectrum of potent activity against a wide range of fungi. In the present study, we investigated the therapeutic effects of oral ER-30346 on experimental local infections caused by Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans, and Cryptococcus neoformans and compared them with those of itraconazole and fluconazole. In experimental murine models of pulmonary aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis, ER-30346 reduced the numbers of CFU in the lungs significantly compared with the numbers of CFU in the lungs of the controls (P < 0.05). ER-30346 was as effective as or more effective than itraconazole against pulmonary aspergillosis. Against pulmonary candidiasis and cryptococcosis, ER-30346 was more effective than itraconazole and was as effective as fluconazole. ER-30346 was also effective against pulmonary candidiasis caused by fluconazole-resistant C. albicans. In mice with intracranial cryptococcosis, ER-30346 reduced the numbers of CFU in the brains significantly compared with the numbers of CFU in the brains of the controls (P < 0.05) and was more effective than itraconazole and as effective as fluconazole. In an experimental model of oral candidiasis in rats, ER-30346 reduced the numbers of CFU in oral swabs significantly compared with the numbers of CFU in oral swabs from the controls (P < 0.05) and was more effective than itraconazole and as effective as fluconazole. Thus, ER-30346 shows efficacy in murine aspergillosis, candidiasis, and cryptococcosis models. Further studies are needed to determine the potential of ER-30346 for use in the treatment of these infections.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8891122&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
Fluconazole distribution to the brain: a crossover study in freely-moving rats using in vivo microdialysis.

Yang H, Wang Q, Elmquist WF.

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences. College of Pharmacy, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha 68198 6025, USA.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine if the microdialysis sampling technique is feasible to study the central nervous system distributional kinetics of a novel triazole antifungal agent, fluconazole, in an awake, freely-moving rat model, and to determine fluconazole distribution to the extracellular fluid (ECF) of the brain. METHODS: The relative recovery of the microdialysis probes (CMA-12) was determined in vitro and in vivo by retrodialysis using UK-54,373, a fluorinated analog of fluconazole. Sprague-Dawley rats received 10 mg/kg and 20 mg/kg fluconazole IV bolus doses in a crossover design, and brain extracellular fluid fluconazole concentrations were monitored using microdialysis and on-line HPLC analysis. The plasma fluconazole concentration vs. time data were determined using sequential blood sampling and HPLC analysis. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference between relative probe recoveries for both fluconazole and UK-54,373, either in vitro or in vivo, and probe recoveries did not change during the course of the in vivo crossover experiment. Fluconazole rapidly distributes into in the brain ECF and the average brain distribution coefficient (brain/plasma AUC ratio) was 0.60 +/- 0.18 and was independent of dose. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters were linear in the dose range studied. CONCLUSIONS: Fluconazole rapidly reaches a distributional equilibrium between brain extracellular fluid and plasma, and the distribution to the brain is substantial and not dependent on dose over a two-fold range. Furthermore, the results indicate that microdialysis utilizing UK-54,373 as the in vivo retrodialysis probe calibrator is a feasible method to study the transport of fluconazole into the central nervous system.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8899853&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan



Diflucan
A randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-response study of micafungin compared with fluconazole for the treatment of esophageal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients.

de Wet N, Llanos-Cuentas A, Suleiman J, Baraldi E, Krantz EF, Della Negra M, Diekmann-Berndt H.

Prime Cure Clinic, Durban, South Africa.

BACKGROUND: Severely immunocompromised individuals are highly susceptible to Candida infection of the esophagus. This randomized, double-blind study assessed the dose-response relationship of the new echinocandin antifungal, micafungin, compared with that of standard fluconazole treatment. METHODS: A total of 245 patients (age, > or =18 years) with a prior diagnosis of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection and esophageal candidiasis, confirmed by endoscopy and culture, were randomized to receive micafungin (50, 100, or 150 mg per day) or fluconazole (200 mg per day). Both agents were administered once per day by a 1-h intravenous infusion for 14-21 days. The primary efficacy end point was endoscopic cure rate, defined as endoscopy grade of 0 at the end of therapy. RESULTS: The endoscopic cure rate (grade 0) was dose-dependent with 50, 100, and 150 mg of micafungin per day at 68.8%, 77.4%, and 89.8%, respectively. Symptoms improved or resolved rapidly (3-7 days of treatment in the majority of patients). The endoscopic cure rate for 100 and 150 mg of micafungin per day (83.5%) was comparable to that for 200 mg of fluconazole per day (86.7%; 95% confidence interval for the difference in endoscopic cure rate, -14.0% to 7.7%). The overall safety and tolerability was acceptable, with no important differences between micafungin (all doses) and fluconazole. CONCLUSIONS: The dose-response findings demonstrate a greater efficacy with micafungin at 100 and 150 mg per day than at 50 mg per day. This study also indicates that the efficacy of micafungin (at dosages of 100 and 150 mg per day) was comparable to that of fluconazole, suggesting that micafungin represents a valuable new treatment option for esophageal candidiasis in HIV-positive patients.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15472817&dopt=Abstract fluconazole Diflucan









Diflucan (fluconazole) References

Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 1 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 2 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 3 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 4 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 5 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 6 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 7 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 8 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 9 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 10 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 11 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 12 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 13 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 14 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 15 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 16 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 17 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 18 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 19 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 20 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 21 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 22 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 23 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 24 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 25 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 26 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 27 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 28 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 29 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 30 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 31 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 32 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 33 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 34 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 35 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 36 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 37 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 38 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 39 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 40 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 41 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 42 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 43 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 44 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 45 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 46 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 47 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 48 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 49 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 50 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 51 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 52 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 53 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 54 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 55 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 56 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 57 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 58 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 59 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 60 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 61 | Diflucan or fluconazole Refs 62



© DreamPharm.com