|
Cleocin Use of clindamycin disks To detect macrolide resistance mediated by ermB and mefE in Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates from adults and children.
Waites K, Johnson C, Gray B, Edwards K, Crain M, Benjamin W Jr.
Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA. waites path.uab.edu
We studied 198 macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae isolates obtained from adults and children to evaluate whether 2-microgram clindamycin disks can distinguish between isolates manifesting ermB- versus mefE-mediated resistance to clarithromycin and to determine the relative frequency with which each resistance mechanism occurred in these populations. The mefE gene was predominant among 109 isolates from children, occurring in 73.4% versus 50.6% of 89 isolates from adults. Three isolates (1.5%) did not amplify either gene. Among 125 mefE(+) isolates, the MIC of clarithromycin at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited, determined by Etest, was 32 microgram/ml versus >256 microgram/ml in 70 ermB(+) isolates. All ermB(+) isolates were highly resistant to clindamycin (MICs >256 microgram/ml), whereas all mefE(+) isolates were susceptible to clindamycin using the 2-microgram disk. Testing S. pneumoniae from the respiratory tract for susceptibility to clindamycin by agar disk diffusion is an easy and inexpensive method to estimate the frequency of resistance mediated by ermB in specific patient populations. Macrolide resistance mediated by ermB is usually of greater magnitude than that due to mefE. Clinical studies are needed to determine the significance of high- versus low-level macrolide resistance in S. pneumoniae.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10790089&dopt=Abstract clindamycin antibiotic Cleocin-T
Cleocin Synergic activity, for anaerobes, of trovafloxacin with clindamycin or metronidazole: chequerboard and time-kill methods.
Ednie LM, Credito KL, Khantipong M, Jacobs MR, Appelbaum PC.
Departments of Pathology (Clinical Microbiology), Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA 17033, USA.
Chequerboard titrations were used to test the activity of trovafloxacin, alone and in combination with clindamycin or metronidazole, against 156 Gram-positive or Gram-negative anaerobes, including 47 Bacteroides fragilis group, 36 Prevotella spp., 26 fusobacteria, 21 peptostreptococci and 26 clostridia. MIC50/MIC90 values (mg/L) of each drug alone against all 156 strains were: trovafloxacin, 0.5/1; clindamycin, 0.25/2; metronidazole, 1/2. Synergy (FIC indices </= 0.5) was seen in two strains with trovafloxacin plus clindamycin, and seven with trovafloxacin plus metronidazole. All other combinations were additive (FIC indices >0. 5-2.0); no antagonism (FIC indices >4.0) was seen. In addition, synergy was tested by time-kill methodology for each of the above combinations against 12 Gram-positive or Gram-negative strains. Results indicated that synergy (defined as a >/= 2 log(10) decrease in cfu/mL at 48 h compared with the more active drug alone) was found between trovafloxacin at or below the MIC and both clindamycin and metronidazole at or below the MIC in one strain each of Bacteroides fragilis, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, Prevotella intermedia, Fusobacterium varium, Peptostreptococcus asaccharolyticus and Clostridium bifermentans. Synergy between trovafloxacin (</=MIC) and metronidazole alone was seen in one strain each of Bacteroides distasonis, Prevotella bivia, Fusobacterium mortiferum, P. asaccharolyticus and C. bifermentans. In many cases of synergy, including those at the trovafloxacin MIC, regrowth after 48 h, which was commonly seen with trovafloxacin alone, was inhibited, and 99.9% killing was observed with the combination after 48 h, but not with trovafloxacin alone.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10797085&dopt=Abstract clindamycin antibiotic Cleocin-T
Cleocin Intraocular concentrations of clindamycin obtained by sequential parabulbar injections.
Lincoff H, Kreissig I, Serag Y, Laroche D.
Weill Medical College of Cornell University-New York Presbyterian Hospital, N.Y., USA.
PURPOSE: To measure the intraocular concentration of Clindamycin that can be maintained by sequential injection through a retained parabulbar catheter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The peak intraocular concentration and half-life of Clindamycin after parabulbar injection was determined in a rabbit model. In a second experiment a parabulbar catheter was inserted and the maximum concentration that could be maintained by sequential injection through the catheter at intervals of 6 hours was determined. In a third experiment both eyes of the rabbit were catheterized and one infused with Clindamycin. The eyes were enucleated and studied by light and electron microscopy for changes induced by Clindamycin and the catheter. RESULTS: The concentration of Clindamycin after a single parabulbar injection of 10 mg/kg peaked in the retina and choroid at 2 hours and was 336 micrograms/g. The serum level at 2 hours was 2.2 micrograms/ml. The half-life in choroid and retina was 1 hour. Sequential administration at 6 hour intervals maintained a minimum concentration of 87 micrograms/ml. The vitreous concentration was maintained at 2 micrograms/ml. CONCLUSION: The level of Clindamycin in the retina and choroid obtained by sequential injections of 10 mg/kg exceeds the minimum lethal dose for organisms susceptible to the drug. The low serum concentration suggests that sequential doses of Clindamycin by the parabulbar route might be an effective therapy for toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis and would diminish the risk of colitis or other deleterious systemic side effects.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10820708&dopt=Abstract clindamycin antibiotic Cleocin-T
Cleocin A prospective, randomized, clinical study to compare the clinical safety, effectiveness, and cost of oral ofloxacin/clindamycin vs intravenous clindamycin/gentamicin for the treatment of postpartum endomyometritis.
Pietrantoni M, Goss S, Gall SA.
University of Louisville, Department of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, USA
Objective: The primary objective of this prospective, randomized, clinical study was to compare the safety, clinical and microbiologic efficacy, and cost of oral ofloxacin in combination with clindamycin vs intravenous (IV) clindamycin/gentamicin in the early empiric treatment for hospitalized patients with mild to moderate postpartum endomyometritis. The secondary objective is to reduce total hospital and patient treatment cost. Postpartum endomyometritis is a major cause of infectious morbidity in the obstetric patient. It is the most common complication associated with cesarean delivery. Careful timing and amniotomy, limited vaginal examinations, and prophylactic antibiotics for cesarean section delivery may help to reduce the incidence and severity of endomyometritis. Endomyometritis is caused by bacteria that compose the normal cervicovaginal flora. These are anaerobic gram-positive cocci (Peptostreptococcus and Peptococcus), aerobic streptococci (Group B Streptococci and enterococci), Enterobacteriaceae, Bacteroides (B. fragilis, B. bivius, and B. disiens), and clostridium species.Ofloxacin is a synthetic broad-spectrum antibacterial agent for intravenous and oral administration. Following oral administration, the bioavailability in tablet form is 98% with maximum serum concentrations in 1 to 2 hours. Steady state concentrations are achieved after 4 doses. Ofloxacin usually is bactericidal in action. A synthetic broad-spectrum antibacterial agent for intravenous and oral administration. Ofloxacin inhibits DNA topoisomerase (ATP-hydrolyzing), commonly referred to as DNA-gyrase. DNA-gyrase causes double-stranded DNA breakage; it inhibits duplication, transcription, and repair of bacterial DNA.Methods: This is a preliminary study that has enrolled 19 evaluable patients towards the overall enrollment of 60 patients for statistical significance. Patients clinically diagnosed as having postpartum endomyometritis who meet the inclusion/exclusion criteria were entered into the trial. Patients were examined for the presence of fever (102.2 degrees F), pelvic pain, and foul lochia. A medical history, physical examination, and laboratory analysis were obtained prior to the first dose of antibiotic treatment. A signed consent was obtained prior to the study enrollment and randomization. Appropriate endometrial, blood, and urine culture specimens were obtained prior to the initiation of antibiotic therapy.Patients in Group 1 were treated with oral therapy using ofloxacin 400 mg q12h plus clindamycin 900 mg q8h until 24 hrs of afebrility. In Group 2, patients were treated with clindamycin 900 mg IV q8h plus gentamicin IV 5mg/kg/d q 8h until afebrility. Antibiotic therapy was continued for at least 48 hours unless significant clinical deterioration occurred necessitating the withdrawal of the patient from the study.Results:Conclusions: We found in our preliminary study that oral ofloxacin in combination with oral clindamycin was equally as efficacious, well tolerated, and safe as the combination of intravenous therapy with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of postpartum endomyometritis.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10838268&dopt=Abstract clindamycin antibiotic Cleocin-T
Cleocin Clinical and economic impact of a pharmacist-intervention to promote sequential intravenous to oral clindamycin conversion.
Martinez MJ, Freire A, Castro I, Inaraja MT, Ortega A, Del Campo V, Rodriguez I, Bardan B, Morano LE, Garcia JF.
Department of Pharmacy, Meixoeiro Hospital, Pontevedra, Spain. mjmarvaz unimeixo.cesga.es
A multicentre, prospective, controlled study compared the clinical efficacy, safety and economic impact of a pharmacist intervention to promote sequential intravenous to oral clindamycin conversion. A total of 473 patients receiving intravenous clindamycin for at least 72 hours were included in the study. Two groups were established: an intervention group (204 patients) in which an informative sheet recommending the sequential treatment was provided, and a control group (269 patients). Clindamycin was prescribed for respiratory infections in 38.9% and for prophylaxis in surgery in 25.4% of the patients (71% were contaminated surgery). No difference between groups regarding sex, infection severity, health status or clinical progress was observed. Both the step-down treatments after 72 hours of intravenous clindamycin and the change to the oral route later on, were significantly increased with the intervention (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively). No significant differences between both groups were found in the number of patients with adverse effects associated with the i.v. therapy, although the incidence tended to be lower in the intervention group (49/204 intervention versus 85/269 control, p = 0.07). Compliance with the recommended clindamycin dosing regimen was significantly higher in the intervention group, in which 1.3 days reduction of intravenous therapy provided an average cost savings of PTA5246 (95% CI 2556-7935) per treatment. A higher reduction of 1.7 days was achieved in those patients candidates for switch therapy on the third day of intravenous clindamycin. A sequential program with clindamycin may provide a cost-effective alternative to conventional therapy and the introduction of an information sheet is a cost-effective strategy to promote it.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10849923&dopt=Abstract clindamycin antibiotic Cleocin-T
Cleocin Therapeutic effect of clindamycin and tetracycline on Babesia rodhaini infection in mouse model.
Wijaya A, Wulansari R, Ano H, Inokuma H, Makimura S.
Department of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Miyazaki University, Japan.
In order to identify the alternative effective chemotherapeutic agents for murine babesiosis, some selected drugs were examined for their efficacy against protozoan infection in the mouse-Babesia rodhaini (B. rodhaini) model. Clindamycin was not completely effective for elimination of parasites in a dose of 50 mg or 100 mg/kg BW/day b.i.d. but effective to prolong the life span of hosts, while it completely cured B. rodhaini infections in a dose of 200 mg. On the other hand, a double therapy consisting of 2 treatments with 100 mg clindamycin and 100 mg clindamycin and with 100 mg clindamycin and 100 mg tetracycline; respectively, and a single therapy with 100 mg tetracycline or 200 mg clindamycin, had a possibility to clear away B. rodhaini organisms from hosts. However, almost all the treatment groups, had a relapse of the infection within 10 days post treatment or re-treatment. Cured mice by treatment with clindamycin and clindamycin, or clindamycin and tetracycline showed complete resistance against challenge with B. rodhaini, while mice cured by administration of clindamycin at 200 mg or tetracycline at 100 mg showed incomplete resistance to challenge infection. The present data suggest that the two former chemotherapies can induce effective protective immunity (premunization), but the latter two chemotherapies induce incomplete premunization.
Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10993180&dopt=Abstract clindamycin antibiotic Cleocin-T
Cleocin-T (clindamycin antibiotic) References
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 1 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 2 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 3 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 4 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 5 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 6 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 7 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 8 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 9 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 10 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 11 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 12 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 13 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 14 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 15 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 16 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 17 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 18 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 19 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 20 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 21 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 22 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 23 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 24 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 25 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 26 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 27 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 28 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 29 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 30 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 31 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 32 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 33 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 34 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 35 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 36 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 37 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 38 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 39 |
Cleocin-T or clindamycin 40
| |