|
Asthma phenotypes according to the timing of smoking onset in young adults.
Annesi-Maesano I.
Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Centre Francois Magendie, Hopital du Haut-Leveque, CHU de Bordeaux, Pessac, France. chantal.raherison chu-bordeaux.fr
SETTING: Whether and how cigarette smoking influences asthma are still matters of debate. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with asthma according to whether individuals began active smoking before or after asthma onset. DESIGN: A sample of 544 individuals was examined using the protocol of the European Community Respiratory Health Status, Phase 1. RESULTS: Current active smoking (43.6%) was associated with wheezing during the past year (15.2%, OR 3.7; 95% CI 1.7-8.4), but not with asthma (17.6%, OR 0.78; 95% CI 0.48-1.26). However, active smoking modulated risk factors for asthma. Asthma that developed before smoking and asthma without smoking were both significantly related to nasal allergy, parental asthma and atopy (as assessed by skin prick test positivity and increased total and specific IgE levels). Only a lower FEV1 level was significantly associated with asthma that initiated after beginning smoking. CONCLUSIONS: Our data put forward different phenotypes of asthma according to the timing of smoking onset and suggest that asthma either never accompanied by smoking or followed by smoking onset might be characterised by an allergic pattern. Longitudinal studies are warranted to further clarify the relationships among asthma phenotypes according to the sequence of disease onset and smoking.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12701840&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
National trends in asthma visits and asthma pharmacotherapy, 1978-2002.
Cockburn I.
Stanford Center for Research in Disease Prevention, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA 94304, USA.
BACKGROUND: Research is limited on physicians' compliance with recent clinical guidelines for asthma treatment. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to investigate the relationships among clinical guidelines, asthma pharmacotherapy, and office-based visits through use of nationally representative data. METHODS: Nationally representative data on prescribing patterns by office-based US physicians were extracted from the National Disease and Therapeutic Index. We tracked 1978-2002 trends in the frequency of asthma visits and patterns of asthma pharmacotherapy, focusing on the use of controller and reliever medications. RESULTS: The estimated annual number of asthma visits in the United States increased continuously from 1978 through 1990 (18 million visits); since 1990, it has remained relatively stable. Controller medication use increased 8-fold between 1978 and 2002, inhaled corticosteroids manifesting the biggest increases. The use of reliever medications, particularly short-acting oral beta(2)-agonists, decreased modestly over this period. The aggregate use of controllers (83% of visits) superseded that of relievers (80%) for the first time in 2001. Improved appropriateness of asthma pharmacotherapy was also suggested by an increase in the controller-to-reliever ratio, which reached 92% in 2002. Xanthines, which once dominated asthma therapy (63% of visits in 1978), were used in only 2% of visits in 2002. More recent drug entrants have been adopted rapidly, single-entity long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists being used in 9% of visits and leukotriene modifiers in 24% of visits in 2002. CONCLUSION: Asthma pharmacotherapy has changed extensively in the past 25 years. Practices over the last decade are increasingly consistent with evidence-based guidelines. These changes in medication use might have contributed to the lack of a recent increase in asthma visits.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12704350&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
Evidence for gene-environment interactions in a linkage study of asthma and smoking exposure.
Collaborative Study for the Genetics of Asthma.
Department of Human Genetics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
BACKGROUND: Asthma, a common and chronic disease of the airways, has a multifactorial cause involving both genetic and environmental factors. As a result, mapping genes that influence asthma susceptibility has been challenging. OBJECTIVE: This study tests the hypothesis that inclusion of exposure to environmental tobacco smoke (ETS), a potential risk factor for asthma, would improve the ability to map genes for asthma. METHODS: By using 144 white families from the Collaborative Study for the Genetics of Asthma, environmental information about exposure to ETS during infancy was incorporated into a genome-wide multipoint linkage analysis. Statistical significance of observed gene-environment interactions was assessed by means of simulation. RESULTS: Three regions with nominal evidence for linkage when stratified on the basis of ETS exposure were identified (P <.01) and showed a significant increase from the baseline lod score (1p at 97 cM, D1S1669-D1S1665; 5q at 135 cM, D5S1505-D5S816; and 9q at 106 cM, D9S910; all P <.05). In addition, 2 other regions, although not meeting nominal significance after stratification on the basis of ETS exposure, showed a significant increase from baseline lod score when ETS was taken into account (1q at 240 cM, D1S549; 17p at 3 cM, D17S1308; all P <.01). CONCLUSION: These results illustrate how evidence for linkage of asthma can depend on exposure to an environmental factor, such as ETS. Future linkage analyses should include information on suspected environmental factors for asthma to help target new candidate susceptibility genes for asthma.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12704367&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
Rhinasthma: a new specific QoL questionnaire for patients with rhinitis and asthma.
Canonica GW.
Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, DIMI, Genoa University, Genoa, Italy.
INTRODUCTION: To date we have available specific instruments assessing health-related quality of life (HRQL) in rhinoconjunctivitis or in asthma, but not instruments evaluating rhinitis and asthma together, although they often coexist. The aim of our study was to develop and validate a specific quality of life (QoL) questionnaire for adult patients with rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma or both. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A pool of 42 items covering the main symptoms and problems related to respiratory allergy, was generated based on literature review and clinical experience. The items were randomly listed and presented to 148 consecutive outpatients 46 suffering from asthma (age 32.9 +/- 14.3 years), 53 suffering from rhinoconjunctivitis (age 32.6 +/- 11.5 years) and 49 from asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis (age 35.6 +/- 12.2 years). The patients were asked to indicate which item they had directly experienced and for each of them, its importance on a four-point scale (1 = not important; 4 = very important). Twelve items were cancelled from the list, because of low importance or redundance. In the instrument validation phase, 104 patients (42 with rhinoconjunctivitis alone and 62 with asthma and rhinoconjunctivitis) were evaluated with the generic instrument SF-36 and the new questionnaire (RHINASTHMA). RESULTS: RHINASTHMA was able to differentiate patients with rhinitis from those with both rhinitis and asthma. In stable condition, RHINASTHMA showed good reliability. The factor analysis extracted three factors with a good reliability (0.93, 0.87, 0.76). DISCUSSION: RHINASTHMA is the first tool aimed at evaluating HRQL impairment in patients with rhinitis and/or asthma. It provides a short and simple assessment, and has overall psychometric properties. This is of relevance because of the frequent asthma-rhinitis comorbidity.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12708975&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
Similar levels of nitric oxide in exhaled air in non-asthmatic rhinitis and asthma after bronchial allergen challenge.
van der Zee JS.
Department of Pulmonology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
BACKGROUND: Nitric oxide in exhaled air (eNO) is elevated in allergic asthma compared with healthy subjects and has been proposed as a marker of bronchial inflammation. However, eNO is elevated to a lesser extent in allergic non-asthmatic rhinitis as well. Considering the distinctive clinical appearances of both allergic diseases, differences in eNO are expected to persist after allergen exposure. The aim of the study was to compare allergen-induced changes in eNO in house dust mite sensitized patients with asthma and patients with perennial rhinitis without asthma symptoms. METHODS: Bronchial allergen challenge was performed in 52 patients sensitized to house dust mite (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus), of whom 26 had non-asthmatic rhinitis and 26 had asthma. Levels of eNO were measured before and 1 h, 1 day and 1 week after challenge. RESULTS: At baseline eNO was significantly lower in non-asthmatic rhinitis compared with asthma (geometric mean eNO (SEM): 121 (1.1) in non-asthmatic rhinitis vs 197 (1.1) nl/min in asthma, P < 0.006). However, the increase in eNO after bronchial allergen challenge in non-asthmatic rhinitis, in particular in those patients with a dual asthmatic response, significantly exceeded the increase in asthma resulting in similar levels of eNO after challenge (geometric mean eNO (SEM) at 24 h postchallenge 204 (1.1) in non-asthmatic rhinitis vs 244 (1.1)nl/min in asthma, P = 0.3). CONCLUSION: The difference in eNO between non-asthmatic rhinitis and asthma at baseline is abolished after allergen exposure due to a significantly greater increase in eNO in non-asthmatic rhinitis.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12708977&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
Attitudes of physicians toward objective measures of airway function in asthma.
Panettieri RA Jr.
Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Division, University of Pennsylvania Health System, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6160, USA.
BACKGROUND: The National Asthma Education and Prevention Program (NAEPP) recommends pulmonary function testing as part of asthma evaluation. The objectives of this study were to determine the use of spirometry in patients with asthma by primary care physicians and asthma specialists, and to identify barriers to use of spirometry. METHODS: We developed, validated, and administered a mailed survey to primary care physicians and asthma specialists in the general community. We asked about the use of spirometry, access to spirometry, and barriers to spirometry use. RESULTS: Of 975 eligible subjects, 672 (69%) completed the survey. Asthma specialists were more likely to have an office spirometer (78% [216/277] vs. 43% [169/395], P <0.001) than were primary care physicians, and more likely to report measuring pulmonary function in at least 75% of their patients with asthma (83% [223/270] vs. 34% [131/388], P <0.001). In logistic regression analysis, factors most strongly associated with reported spirometry use (in at least 75% of patients) among asthma specialists were owning a spirometer, disagreeing with the statement that the test requires excessive use of office resources, and agreeing that spirometry is a necessary part of the asthma evaluation. Among primary care physicians, owning a spirometer, agreeing that the data are necessary for accurate diagnosis, and believing that they were trained to perform and interpret the test were most strongly associated with reported spirometry use. CONCLUSION: Pulmonary function testing is underutilized by physicians, with rates of utilization lowest among primary care physicians. Providing primary care physicians with better access to spirometry, through provision of a machine and appropriate training in its use and interpretation, may improve compliance with the NAEPP recommendations. Copyright 2003 by Excerpta Medica Inc.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12714129&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
[Clinical properties of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with asthma]
[Article in Japanese]
Sano Y.
Department of Allergy and Respiratory Medicine, Doai Memorial Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
PURPOSE: Many reports were found on the clinical properties of community-acquired pneumonia. The clinical properties of community-acquired pneumonia in patients with asthma have not been elucidated, and we therefore investigated such properties. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Asthmatic patients who required hospitalization for community-acquired pneumonia from the beginning of 1989 through the end of 2001 were enrolled in this study. We performed the study in a retrospective manner. Patients were divided into two groups based on severity of their asthma (mild to moderate asthma vs severe asthma), and we studied the clinical properties of the pneumonia. RESULT: No significant difference was seen in body temperature, white blood cell counts, or CRP value on admission between the two groups. No significant difference was seen in the resolving period of the pneumonia. The frequency of common pathogens (Streptococcus pneumoniae + Haemophilus influenzae) was lower in patients with severe asthma. Asthmatic patients not taking daily oral corticosteroids were divided into two groups based on whether or not they were using a inhaled corticosteroid, and we examined the frequency of pathogendetection. The percentage of common pathogens was almost the same in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The frequency of common pathogens was lower in patients with severe asthma than in those with mild to moderate asthma. This fact is worth considering when empiric therapy for pneumonia is performed in patients with asthma. Inhaled corticosteroid therapy seems to have no influence on the pathogens of pneumonia in patients with asthma.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12722326&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
Smoking patterns among adolescents with asthma attending upper secondary schools: a community-based study.
Madsen M.
National Institute of Public Health, Copenhagen, Denmark. dhansen dadlnet.dk
OBJECTIVE: Smoking among people who have asthma may be a serious health problem. We studied the prevalence of smoking and the relations between smoking and asthma, symptoms, medicine, and gender differences among adolescents with asthma. METHODS: A national cross-sectional study on health and lifestyles was performed in 1996-1997 using a computerized questionnaire in upper secondary schools in Denmark. We included 1887 pupils with asthma (defined as self-reported asthma diagnosed by a physician) and 20 688 controls. Smoking was categorized as daily, occasional, ex-smokers, and never smoked. We adjusted for age, gender, parents' job and smoking, family type, body mass index, and exercise habits. RESULTS: In total, 37.7% smoked currently and 16.5% smoked daily; more girls than boys smoked. More pupils with asthma than without smoked daily (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 1.15; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-1.33), they smoked significantly more cigarettes daily (10.3 vs 9.6), and more were heavy smokers (> or =15 cigarettes daily; adjusted OR: 1.47; 95% CI:1.14-1.91). Furthermore, nearly twice as many pupils who had asthma with symptoms but were not using medicine smoked as pupils who had asthma without symptoms and were using medicine (adjusted OR: 1.84; 95% CI: 0.99-3.41). More boys with asthma than without started smoking before 14 years of age (adjusted OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.09-2.81). However, more pupils with asthma had tried to quit (adjusted OR: 1.26; 95% CI: 0.99-1.60). Pupils with and without asthma were occasional smokers and ex-smokers at a similar prevalence. CONCLUSIONS: More pupils with asthma than without smoked daily, and they also smoked more cigarettes per day. This is a major health concern, as adolescents have a high smoking prevalence in Denmark.
Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12728110&dopt=Abstract asthma, asthma drug, asthma medicine
Asthma References
asthma 1 |
asthma 2 |
asthma 3 |
asthma 4 |
asthma 5 |
asthma 6 |
asthma 7 |
asthma 8 |
asthma 9 |
asthma 10 |
asthma 11 |
asthma 12 |
asthma 13 |
asthma 14 |
asthma 15 |
asthma 16 |
asthma 17 |
asthma 18 |
asthma 19 |
asthma 20 |
asthma 21 |
asthma 22 |
asthma 23 |
asthma 24 |
asthma 25 |
asthma 26 |
asthma 27 |
asthma 28 |
asthma 29 |
asthma 30 |
asthma 31 |
asthma 32 |
asthma 33 |
asthma 34 |
asthma 35 |
asthma 36 |
asthma 37 |
asthma 38 |
asthma 39 |
asthma 40 |
asthma 41 |
asthma 42 |
asthma 43 |
asthma 44 |
asthma 45 |
asthma 46 |
asthma 47 |
asthma 48 |
asthma 49 |
asthma 50 |
asthma 51 |
asthma 52 |
asthma 53 |
asthma 54 |
asthma 55 |
asthma 56 |
asthma 57 |
asthma 58 |
asthma 59 |
asthma 60 |
asthma 61 |
asthma 62 |
asthma 63 |
asthma 64 |
asthma 65 |
asthma 66 |
asthma 67 |
asthma 68 |
asthma 69 |
asthma 70 |
asthma 71 |
asthma 72 |
asthma 73 |
asthma 74 |
asthma 75 |
asthma 76 |
asthma 77 |
asthma 78 |
asthma 79 |
asthma 80 |
asthma 81 |
asthma 82 |
asthma 83 |
asthma 84 |
asthma 85 |
asthma 86 |
asthma 87 |
asthma 88 |
asthma 89
| |