Amitriptyline




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites




zeus.bwh.harvard.edu

BACKGROUND: Amitriptyline has been reported to be a more potent local anesthetic than bupivacaine. In keeping with the objective of identifying drugs for prolonged cutaneous analgesia, the authors compared the cutaneous analgesic effectiveness of amitriptyline and bupivacaine in rats. METHODS: Rats were subcutaneously injected on shaved dorsal skin. The skin wheal raised after injection of 0.6 ml of various concentrations of either amitriptyline or bupivacaine with and without epinephrine (1:200,000) was marked. Inhibition of the cutaneous trunci muscle reflex was evaluated quantitatively by the fraction of times a total of six pinpricks applied to the marked area failed to elicit a nocifensive motor response compared with control responses. No responses out of six pinpricks was defined as 100% maximum possible effect. RESULTS: Complete recovery from the cutaneous analgesia elicited by 0.05% and 0.5 amitriptyline versus 0.05 and 0.5% bupivacaine occurred in 9.9 +/- 0.2 and 19.3 +/- 0.4 h versus 2.2 +/- 0.1 and 16.1 +/- 0.2 h, respectively (mean +/- SE). Addition of epinephrine increased this duration to 14.1 +/- 0.1 and 21.4 +/- 0.2 h versus 3.2 +/- 0.1 and 17.0 +/- 0.3 h, respectively. Complete nociceptive blockade after coinjection of 0.25% amitriptyline, 0.25% bupivacaine, and epinephrine lasted 24 +/- 0.5 h, and complete recovery from this block took 33 +/- 0.5 h. Areas under the percent maximum possible effect versus time curve were 1,770 +/- 24 and 1,471 +/- 50% h for 0.5% amitriptyline and bupivacaine with epinephrine, respectively, whereas this value was 2,836 +/- 62% h for the coinjected 0.25% amitriptyline, 0.25% bupivacaine, and epinephrine admixture. CONCLUSION: Amitriptyline is a longer-acting local anesthetic compared with bupivacaine for cutaneous infiltration. Its analgesic effectiveness is significantly enhanced by epinephrine. Coinjection of amitriptyline and bupivacaine with epinephrine enhances the analgesic duration of both drugs.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11753010&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline




J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002 Feb;22(1):46-54.
Decreased plasma levels of amitriptyline and its metabolites on comedication with an extract from St. John's wort ( Hypericum perforatum ).

Johne A, Schmider J, Brockmoller J, Stadelmann AM, Stormer E, Bauer S, Scholler G, Langheinrich M, Roots I.

Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, University Medical Center Charite, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.

Extracts of St. John's wort ( Hypericum perforatum ) became increasingly popular as easily available remedies for mild to moderate depression. Comedication with hypericum extract was recently shown to drastically reduce plasma concentration of ciclosporin, digoxin, and indinavir. We investigated the possible interaction of hypericum extract LI160 with amitriptyline. Both antidepressants have a high probability of concomitant use. Twelve patients requiring amitriptyline treatment received a single dose of hypericum extract (900 mg) at day 1, continued by a 12-to 14-day treatment with retarded amitriptyline (75 mg twice daily). Then hypericum (900 mg/day) was added for another 14 to 16 days. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of amitriptyline were compared before and after multiple-dose treatment with hypericum extract. Furthermore, comparisons were made for single-dose kinetics of hypericum-extract ingredients hypericin, pseudohypericin, and hyperforin between the first day of concomitant treatment and LI160 alone. Multiple-dose comedication with LI160 led to a statistically significant decrease in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve within one dosing interval of amitriptyline by 22% ( p = 0.03) and nortriptyline by 41% ( p = 0.002), as well as of all hydroxylated metabolites, except for 10-E-hydroxynortriptyline. Plasma levels of amitriptyline and hydroxylated metabolites gradually decreased, whereas nortriptyline concentrations were already markedly decreased after 3 days of cotreatment with hypericum. Cumulative urinary amounts of amitriptyline and metabolites decreased to the same extent as plasma concentrations upon hypericum comedication. Induction of cytochrome P-450 enzymes or drug transporters (P-glycoprotein) by St. John's wort extract may explain this pharmacokinetic interaction. Physicians should be aware of this interaction when treating patients with amitriptyline.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11799342&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline




Anesth Analg. 2002 Feb;94(2):427-31, table of contents.
Peripheral amitriptyline suppresses formalin-induced Fos expression in the rat spinal cord.

Heughan CE, Allen GV, Chase TD, Sawynok J.

Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

We examined the effects of systemically, spinally, and peripherally administered amitriptyline on formalin-induced Fos immunoreactivity in the lumbar spinal cord. Formalin (2.5%), injected subcutaneously into the rat hindpaw, increased Fos immunoreactivity in laminae I-II, III-IV, and V-VI of the dorsal L5 spinal cord. Amitriptyline, administered both systemically and spinally before formalin, increased flinching and concurrently decreased biting/licking behaviors, but neither route of administration produced any statistically significant change in Fos immunoreactivity. Amitriptyline coadministered with the formalin reduced both flinching and biting/licking behaviors, and significantly reduced Fos immunoreactivity, particularly in laminae I-II. These immunohistochemical changes reflect the net behavioral effects observed after the different routes of drug administration. The profile of amitriptyline action after peripheral administration may be of clinical importance because of the potential use of antidepressants as topical analgesics. IMPLICATIONS: In the formalin test, amitriptyline produces different effects on pain behaviors after systemic, spinal administration and peripheral administration. Fos protein, an indicator of neuronal activity after noxious stimulation, is upregulated after formalin injection. We examined the effects of amitriptyline on such expression and observed a reduction in expression with peripheral administration.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11812713&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline

ed.ac.uk

Increasing evidence links chronically elevated glucocorticoid levels and cognitive impairments in a subpopulation of aged rodents and humans. Antidepressant drugs improve hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis feedback regulation and reduce plasma glucocorticoid levels. Decreasing the cumulative lifetime exposure to glucocorticoid excess by long-term exposure to antidepressants may prevent the emergence of cognitive impairments in aged rats. To test this hypothesis, we treated middle-aged male Lister hooded rats (16 months) with amitriptyline until they were 24 months of age, and their cognitive function was assessed in the water maze. Performance in the spatial learning task declined significantly with aging (p < 0.01), with 33% of aged controls showing poorer (<2.5 SD) probe test performance than young controls. Amitriptyline treatment from midlife preserved water maze performance with aging (p < 0.01 compared with aged controls) and significantly (p < 0.01) reduced the proportion of poor performers (7%). Measures of anxiety-related behaviors in the elevated plus-maze were significantly (p < 0.05) decreased in the aged rats after amitriptyline. Furthermore, evening plasma corticosterone levels were reduced (30% decrease; p < 0.01 compared with aged controls) after 6 months of amitriptyline. These data suggest that long-term treatment with amitriptyline decreases the prevalence of cognitive impairment in aged rats and that this may, in part, be a consequence of reduced plasma corticosterone levels and reduced anxiety.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11850470&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline




Anesth Analg. 2002 Apr;94(4):975-80, table of contents.
The interaction between gabapentin and amitriptyline in the rat formalin test after systemic administration.

Heughan CE, Sawynok J.

Department of Pharmacology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.

We examined the effects of systemically administered gabapentin on flinching and biting/licking behaviors produced by 2.5% formalin in the rat, compared these with those of amitriptyline, and determined the effects of combinations of gabapentin with amitriptyline. Gabapentin produced a dose-related inhibition of Phase 2, but not Phase 1, flinching and biting/licking behaviors. In contrast, amitriptyline produced an increase in Phase 2 flinching behaviors while simultaneously decreasing biting/licking behaviors. Fifty percent effective dose (ED50) values against biting/licking behaviors were 22.9 +/- 1.3 mg/kg and 8.5 +/- 1.3 mg/kg for gabapentin and amitriptyline, respectively. Combinations of increasing fractional increments of ED50 doses of gabapentin and amitriptyline produced an additive effect against biting/licking behaviors, as revealed by isobolographic analysis. These increments had no effect on flinching behaviors except at the ED25 + ED25 doses, at which flinching was increased, again revealing additivity between the two drugs. Flinching behaviors in rats do not reflect the analgesic properties of systemically administered amitriptyline observed in humans and may not be useful for predicting an effect of combinations of drugs with amitriptyline. Biting/licking behaviors do reflect analgesic properties for both drugs and may be more useful in this regard. IMPLICATIONS: By use of the rat formalin test, a model of persistent pain, we examined the effect of a combination of amitriptyline and gabapentin, which are used to treat chronic pain in humans. The drug combination produced additive analgesia against one outcome, but another outcome was more ambiguous.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11916807&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline




Pol J Pharmacol. 2001 Jul-Aug;53(4):351-7.
Effects of antidepressant drugs on the activity of cytochrome P-450 measured by caffeine oxidation in rat liver microsomes.

Danie WA, Syrek M, Rylko Z, Wojcikowski J.

Department of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Institute of Pharmacology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Krakow.

Caffeine is a marker drug for testing the activity of CYP1A2 (3-N-demethylation) in humans and rats. Moreover, it is also a relatively specific substrate of CYP3A (8-hydroxylation). In the case of 1-N- and in particular 7-N-demethylation of caffeine, apart from CYP1A2, other cytochrome P-450 isoenzymes play a considerable role. The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of imipramine, amitriptyline and fluoxetine on cytochrome P-450 activity measured by caffeine oxidation in rat liver microsomes. The obtained results showed that imipramine exerted a most potent inhibitory effect on caffeine metabolism. Imipramine decreased the rate of 3-N-, 1-N- and 7-N-demethylations, and 8-hydroxylation of caffeine, the effect on 3-N-demethylation being most pronounced (Ki = 33 microM). Amitriptyline showed distinct inhibition of 3-N- and 1-N-demethylation of caffeine, though its effect was less potent than in the case of imipramine (Ki = 57 and 61 pM, respectively). The influence of amitriptyline on 8-hydroxylation and especially on 7-N-demethylation of caffeine was weaker (Ki = 108 and 190 pM, respectively) than on 3-N- or 1-N-demethylation, suggesting a narrower spectrum of cytochrome P-450 inhibition by amitriptyline than by imipramine, involving mainly the subfamily CYP1A2, and--to a lesser degree--CYP3A. In contrast to the tested tricyclic antidepressants, fluoxetine did not exert any considerable effect on the 3-N- or 1-N-demethylation of caffeine (Ki = 152 and 196 microM, respectively), which indicates its low affinity for CYP1A2. However, fluoxetine displayed a clear inhibitory effect on caffeine 7-N-demethylation (Ki = 72 microM), the reaction which is catalyzed mainly by other than CYP1A2 isoenzymes. Fluoxetine diminished markedly the 8-hydroxylation of the marker drug; as reflected by Ki values, the potency of inhibition of rat CYP3A by fluoxetine was similar to that of imipramine (Ki = 40 and 45 microM, respectively). In summary, CYP1A2 was distinctly inhibited by imipramine and amitriptyline, CYP3A by imipramine and fluoxetine, while other CYP isoenzymes (CYP2B and/or 2E1) by imipramine and fluoxetine.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11990081&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline




Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002 May 21;1587(1):92-8.
Antidepressants inhibit human acetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase activity.

Muller TC, Rocha JB, Morsch VM, Neis RT, Schetinger MR.

Departamento de Quimica, Centro de Ciencias Naturais e Exatas, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, 97105-900, RS, Brazil.

This study examines the effect of the antidepressants fluoxetine, sertraline and amitriptyline on cholinesterase (acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE)) activities in human serum and erythrocyte membrane (ghost). The concentrations used range from 3 to 60 microM for fluoxetine and amitriptyline and 0.3 to 12 microM for sertraline. At the micromolar range concentration, different classes of antidepressants, including fluoxetine and sertraline (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)) and amitriptyline (tricyclic antidepressant) inhibited human serum cholinesterase. The order of inhibitory potency was sertraline>amitriptyline>>fluoxetine and the IC(50) values were 4.05, 9.43 and 62 microM, respectively. Analysis of kinetic data indicated that the inhibition caused by all the antidepressants was mixed in nature. At the micromolar range concentration, sertraline (60-120 microM) and amitriptyline (60-180 microM) inhibited human erythrocyte AChE. The order of inhibitory potency was sertraline>amitriptyline and the IC(50) values were 80 and 134 microM, respectively. Analysis of kinetic data indicated that the inhibition caused by all the antidepressants in AChE human erythrocyte membrane (ghost) was mixed in nature. The interaction of sertraline with the cholinesterase is labile since the removal of inhibitor by gel filtration recovered completely the enzyme activity. Our results demonstrate that the usual clinical antidepressants are inhibitors of the cholinesterases on human serum and erythrocyte membrane.

Online pharmacy ref source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12009429&dopt=Abstract Elavil amitriptyline







Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) References

Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 1 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 2 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 3 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 4 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 5 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 6 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 7 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 8 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 9 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 10 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 11 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 12 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 13 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 14 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 15 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 16 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 17 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 18 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 19 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 20 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 21 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 22 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 23 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 24 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 25 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 26 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 27 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 28 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 29 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 30 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 31 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 32 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 33 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 34 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 35 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 36 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 37 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 38 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 39 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 40 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 41 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 42 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 43 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 44 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 45 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 46 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 47 | Amitriptyline (generic Elavil) 48



© DreamPharm.com