allergy




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites




allergy
A correlation between migraine, histamine and immunoglobulin e.

Gazerani P, Pourpak Z, Ahmadiani A, Hemmati A, Kazemnejad A.

Neuroscience Research Center, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Although migraine affects about 15% of population and many studies have been performed to find the mechanism and a successful management, the physiopathology of migraine is still largely unknown. The possibility of an immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated allergic mechanism and the role of histamine remain controversial. The aim of the present study was to evaluate serum total IgE and histamine levels in migraine patients and the influence of allergy on them. Seventy patients (18-58 years) with migraine without aura were divided into two groups according to their history of allergy (60% with and 40% without allergy). Serum samples were collected during fasting without allowing any premedication during the two periods of attack and remission. There was a control group containing 45 healthy volunteers. Serum total IgE and histamine levels were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and fluorimetric methods, respectively. Mean and standard errors of serum histamine (ng/ml) and total IgE (IU/ml) levels were found in the control group to be 48.16 +/- 2.70 and 38.31 +/- 3.20, in the migraine with allergy group 159.11 +/- 4.60 and 303.30 +/- 42.50 and in the migraine without allergy group 105.01 +/- 8.50 and 79.07 +/- 2.70, respectively. Total IgE levels in migraine with allergy group were found to be significantly (P < 0.0001) above that in the control and another group, suggesting an influence of an IgE-mediated mechanism on migraine. Although the plasma histamine levels, which were significantly elevated (P < 0.0001) in patients with migraine, both during headache and symptom-free periods, when compared with the control group, indicate that there is an increased susceptibility to histamine in allergic conditions, this molecule has also an unrelated role in migraine. The relationship between allergy and migraine can be based, in part, on an IgE-mediated mechanism, and histamine release plays an important role. Thus, the avoidance of allergic conditions in migraine patients may be a simple, helpful way for prophylaxis or their treatment.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12641658&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Inhaled corticosteroids and allergy specialty care reduce emergency hospital use for asthma.

Schatz M, Cook EF, Nakahiro R, Petitti D.

Department of Allergy, Kaiser-Permanente Medical Center, San Diego, Calif 92111, USA.

BACKGROUND: The interrelationships between optimal inhaled corticosteroid (IC) therapy, allergy specialist care, and reduced emergency hospital care for asthma have not been well defined. OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate the independent effectiveness of various levels of IC dispensing and allergy specialist care in reducing subsequent emergency asthma hospital use. METHODS: Asthmatic patients (n = 9608) aged 3 to 64 years were identified from an electronic database of a large health maintenance organization. The outcome was any year 2000 asthma hospitalization or emergency department visit. The main predictors were at least one allergy department visit and the number of IC canisters dispensed in 1999. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, insurance type, and asthma severity (1999 emergency asthma hospital use, beta-agonist use, and oral corticosteroid use). RESULTS: Dispensing of 7 or more canisters of ICs (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% CI, 0.43-0.94) and allergy care (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.55-0.97) were associated with reduced subsequent emergency asthma hospital use. More patients with allergy specialist care than those without such care received 7 or more dispensations of ICs (24.7% vs 8.3%, P <.001). When 7 or more dispensations of ICs and allergy specialist care were simultaneously included in an adjusted model, both ICs (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.46-1.00) and allergy care (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.58-1.02) were independently associated with a lower risk of year 2000 emergency asthma hospital care, although significance was borderline. CONCLUSION: Allergy care reduces emergency hospital use for asthma by increasing use of ICs but probably also has an independent effect.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12642829&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
In vivo sensitization to purified Hevea brasiliensis proteins in health care workers sensitized to natural rubber latex.

Bernstein DI, Biagini RE, Karnani R, Hamilton R, Murphy K, Bernstein C, Arif SA, Berendts B, Yeang HY.

University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Ohio, USA.

BACKGROUND: Thirteen proteins of natural rubber latex (Hevea brasiliensis) known to bind human IgE have been isolated and characterized as Hev b allergens. However, the in vivo importance of native Hev b allergens has not been defined in health care workers (HCWs) with natural rubber latex (NRL) allergy. OBJECTIVES: The principal aim of this study was to identify the major in vivo Hev b allergens in HCWs with NRL allergy confirmed by percutaneous sensitivity to nonammoniated latex (NAL). METHODS: Skin prick testing was performed with 7 (native) proteins purified from NAL (Hev b 1, 2, 3, 4, 6.01, 7.01, and a newly described Hev b 13) and recombinant Hev b 5 in 62 HCWs with histories of NRL allergy (group 1) confirmed by percutaneous reactivity to NAL and in 49 atopic HCWs without NRL allergy (group 2). Serial 10-fold concentrations of Hev b proteins (5 x 10(-5) microg/mL to 50 microg/mL) were tested; serum samples of subjects were assayed for serum specific IgE by immunoassays. RESULTS: Hev b 2, Hev b 5, Hev b 6.01, and Hev b 13 produced skin reactions in more than 60% of group 1 subjects, with Hev b 1, 3, 4, and 7.01 eliciting reactions in less than 50%. Only 1 of 49 group 2 workers reacted to a single Hev b antigen (Hev b 13). Specificity of 7 Hev b allergens was 100% and 98% for Hev b 13 in identifying workers with confirmed NRL allergy. Specific IgE by AlaSTAT and CAP immunoassays was elevated in 40 of 60 (67%) and 33 of 62 (53%) of NAL-reactive workers and produced false-positive test results in 4 of 49 (8%) and 3 of 48 (6%) group 2 subjects, respectively. CONCLUSION: Hev b 2, 5, and 6.01 are major in vivo allergens and Hev b 13 is a new major in vivo allergen among HCWs with allergy to NRL.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12642845&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Profilin is a relevant melon allergen susceptible to pepsin digestion in patients with oral allergy syndrome.

Rodriguez-Perez R, Crespo JF, Rodriguez J, Salcedo G.

Unidad de Bioquimica, Departamento de Biotecnologia, E.T.S. Ingenieros Agronomos, Madrid; and Servicio de Alergia, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.

BACKGROUND: Melon allergy has been documented by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. The most common clinical feature associated with melon allergy is oral allergy syndrome (OAS). However, no relevant allergens of melon have been identified to date. OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify melon allergens and analyze their digestibility in human saliva and simulated gastric fluid (SGF) to provide a rationale for the OAS. METHODS: Melon, zucchini, cucumber, and watermelon allergens were identified by means of IgE immunoblotting of sera from 21 patients with OAS after melon ingestion confirmed by means of double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge. Further characterization was performed with rabbit antisera against sunflower pollen profilin and anticomplex glycans. Lability of allergens was assayed by incubation of melon extract in human saliva and SGF. RESULTS: Several IgE-binding components between 15 and 60 kd and a main reactive band of 13 kd were detected in melon extract with the pooled sera from patients with melon allergy. As in melon, 13-kd components of zucchini, cucumber, and watermelon extracts were strongly recognized by the IgE antibodies of the patients with melon allergy and were identified as profilins. Putative cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants were also detected. Sera from 71% of patients recognized the melon profilin, and therefore profilin is considered a major allergen. Melon allergens were unaffected by crude human saliva. In contrast, most melon proteins, predominantly the 13-kd component (profilin), were quickly digested in the SGF. CONCLUSION: In patients with OAS, a 13-kd protein identified as a profilin is a major melon allergen highly susceptible to pepsin digestion.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12642849&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Animal models to detect allergenicity to foods and genetically modified products: workshop summary.

Tryphonas H, Arvanitakis G, Vavasour E, Bondy G.

Health Products and Food Branch, Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. Helen_Tryphonas hc-sc.gc.ca

Respiratory allergy and allergy to foods continue to be important health issues. There is evidence to indicate that the incidence of food allergy around the world is on the rise. Current estimates indicate that approximately 5% of young children and 1-2% of adults suffer from true food allergy (Kagan 2003). Although a large number of in vivo and in vitro tests exist for the clinical diagnosis of allergy in humans, we lack validated animal models of allergenicity. This deficiency creates serious problems for regulatory agencies and industries that must define the potential allergenicity of foods before marketing. The emergence of several biotechnologically derived foods and industrial proteins, as well as their potential to sensitize genetically predisposed populations to develop allergy, has prompted health officials and regulatory agencies around the world to seek approaches and methodologies to screen novel proteins for allergenicity.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12573909&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Gelatin prepared from tuna skin: a risk factor for fish allergy or sensitization?

Andre F, Cavagna S, Andre C.

Laboratoire d'Immunopathologie Digestive, INSERM, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, Pierre-Benite, France. claude.andre chu-lyon.fr

BACKGROUND: Although fish gelatin may represent a useful alternative to bovine or porcine gelatin, the clearly recognized high prevalence of fish allergy could increase the risk of anaphylaxis to gelatin. The rationale for investigating tuna gelatin rather than gelatin from more allergenic fishes is the availability of an industrial gelatin under development. The infrequent occurrence of tuna allergy should influence the safety of a derived product. The present study investigated IgE antibodies to tuna-skin-derived gelatin in adults and children with documented fish allergy or sensitization. METHODS: Serum samples were taken from 100 consecutive patients with fish allergy or sensitization and tested for IgE antibodies against hydrolyzed or nonhydrolyzed gelatin extracted from tuna skin as compared to extracts from tuna flesh, tuna skin as well as bovine or porcine gelatin. Patients with tuna allergies or sensitization were sensitive to the same tuna species (yellowfin) as that from which the gelatin was obtained. IgE antibodies to these various extracts were analyzed using SDS-PAGE and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Only 3 of the 100 serum samples tested gave evidence of reactivity to gelatin extracted from tuna skin. Cross-reactivity between bovine/porcine and fish gelatin was not observed. CONCLUSION: The risk of adverse reactions to tuna skin gelatin seems to be significantly lower than the risk of fish allergy. Fish gelatin may represent a valuable alternative to bovine or porcine gelatin. Copyright 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12576731&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Human leucocyte antigen polymorphisms in nut-allergic patients in South Wales.

Hand S, Darke C, Thompson J, Stingl C, Rolf S, Jones KP, Davies BH.

Department of Medicine, Prince Charles Hospital, North Glamorgan NHS Trust, Merthyr Tydfi, UK.

BACKGROUND: Peanuts and tree nuts are among the most common foods provoking severe allergic reactions including fatal anaphylaxis. However, little is known of the underlying genetic and immunological mechanisms involved. OBJECTIVE: Based on findings in other allergic diseases, we have investigated whether specific human leucocyte antigens (HLA) are associated with nut allergy. METHOD: Eighty-four patients presenting at the allergy clinic with symptoms of nut allergy were typed for the HLA Class I (HLA-A and B) and Class II (HLA-DRB1 and DQB1) loci by PCR using sequence-specific primers. Carriage frequencies were compared with 82 atopic non-nut-allergic subjects and 1798 random blood donors. RESULTS: The frequency of HLA-B(*)07 (28.57%) and DRB1(*)11 (15.48%) was increased in the nut-allergic patients compared to the atopic controls (12.20% and 3.66%, respectively) but not when compared to the blood donors (28.86% and 10.12%). DRB1(*)13 and DQB1(*)06 were both increased in frequency in the nut allergy patients over both the atopic and blood donor controls. However, none of these increased frequencies were significant when corrected for the number of comparisons undertaken. CONCLUSION: At HLA '2-digit resolution' and with undifferentiated patients with nut allergy, there are no major disturbances in the frequency of HLA-A, B, DRB1 or DQB1 types. However, the difference in frequency of HLA-DRB1(*)11 between the nut allergy patients and the atopic controls merits further investigation as this may represent an important phenotypic relationship.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=15144462&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine









allergy: online references

allergy 1 | allergy 2 | allergy 3 | allergy 4 | allergy 5 | allergy 6 | allergy 7 | allergy 8 | allergy 9 | allergy 10 | allergy 11 | allergy 12 | allergy 13 | allergy 14 | allergy 15 | allergy 16 | allergy 17 | allergy 18 | allergy 19 | allergy 20 | allergy 21 | allergy 22 | allergy 23 | allergy 24 | allergy 25 | allergy 26 | allergy 27 | allergy 28 | allergy 29 | allergy 30 | allergy 31 | allergy 32 | allergy 33 | allergy 34 | allergy 35 | allergy 36 | allergy 37 | allergy 38 | allergy 39 | allergy 40 | allergy 41 | allergy 42 | allergy 43 | allergy 44 | allergy 45 | allergy 46



© DreamPharm.com