allergy




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Parasites




allergy
Pediatricians' attitudes towards allergy: past and present attitudes of pediatricians towards allergy.

Khan SN, Slavin RG.

Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, Missouri, USA.

BACKGROUND: In 1971 we published a survey of pediatricians' knowledge, attitudes, and practices relative to the field of allergy. This current survey was conducted to determine how these attitudes and practices have changed over the past 27 years. METHODS: Our survey, consisting of 17 questions, was sent to 250 board certified pediatricians in the St. Louis area. Seven of the questions were similar to those in the 1971 survey, while the other ten were new questions which we thought were pertinent to the field of allergy currently. RESULTS: In 1971, 75% of the pediatricians felt the specialty of allergy had great or moderate importance for the practice of pediatrics compared with 99% in 1998. In 1998, the number of physicians who felt that there was at least some value to skin testing had increased from 1971, although, only 36% felt it had great value. In 1971, 23% of pediatricians performed their own skin tests compared with 3% in 1998. Nine percent indicated that they had never referred a patient to an allergist in 1971, compared with 2% in 1998. Our new questions looked at to whom respondents were more likely to refer patients with: (1) asthma (68% allergy, 27% pulmonary, 4% both), (2) urticaria (53% allergy, 41% dermatology, 2% both), (3) chronic eczema (45% allergy, 50% dermatology, 2% both), and (4) chronic sinusitis (24% allergy, 74% otolaryngology, 2% both). Older physicians placed greater importance on the field of allergy and skin testing and were more likely to refer to an allergist than physicians under the age of 40 years. CONCLUSION: Our results indicate that although there has been significant change in 27 years, allergists must be more aggressive in developing the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of physicians relative to the field of allergy.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11030272&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Latex allergy in children on home mechanical ventilation.

Nakamura CT, Ferdman RM, Keens TG, Davidson Ward SL.

Division of Pediatric Pulmonology, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Determining the incidence of latex allergy in children receiving home mechanical ventilation. BACKGROUND: The prevalence of latex allergy in the general population ranges from 0.1 to 1.0%. However, in patients with spina bifida and other chronic medical conditions associated with repeated exposure to latex, the prevalence may be as high as 60%. Children receiving home mechanical ventilation are frequently exposed to latex products. Therefore, we hypothesized that these children would be at increased risk for latex allergy. DESIGN: Fifty-seven children receiving home mechanical ventilation (31 boys, 26 girls; mean [+/- SD] age, 7.8+/-6.6 years; range, 0.3 to 23.2 years) were enrolled. A radioallergosorbent test (RAST) for latex was administered and serum IgE levels were obtained in all patients. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (29.8%) were found to have a positive RAST for latex. Patients with latex allergy had required mechanical ventilation for an average of 6.1+/-4.1 years vs. 5.5+/-5.4 years (p = 0.69; not significant) in those without latex allergy. Eleven of 17 patients (64.7%) had elevated serum IgE levels in the group with latex allergy vs only 14 of 40 patients (35.0%) in the group with a negative latex RAST (p = 0.04; odds ratio, 3.4). CONCLUSION: We conclude that there is a high incidence of latex allergy in children requiring home mechanical ventilation. We speculate that screening all children receiving home mechanical ventilation may lead to the identification of patients with previously undiagnosed latex allergy and the prevention of untoward reactions from exposure to latex.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11035669&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Egg allergy in infancy predicts respiratory allergic disease by 4 years of age.

Tariq SM, Matthews SM, Hakim EA, Arshad SH.

The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Center, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.

Sensitization to hen's egg early in life has been proposed as a predictor for respiratory allergic disease during childhood. However, symptomatic egg allergy in infancy has not been studied in this context. In 1989, a cohort of consecutive births was recruited. Data on family history of atopy and environmental factors were collected. At 4 years of age, 1,218 children were seen of whom 981 were skin-prick tested with a range of food and aero-allergens. Of the 1,218 children, 29 (2.4%) had suffered symptomatic egg allergy (20 during infancy). Egg allergy in infancy was associated with increased respiratory (asthma, rhinitis) allergic disease (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 1.1-22.3; p < 0.05) at 4 years of age, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 55.0%. The addition of infantile eczema to egg allergy increased the PPV to 80% whereas the addition of family history of atopy had no effect. Egg allergy also increased aero-allergen sensitization (OR 6.1, CI 1.1-37.5; PPV 61.1%; p < 0.05). As a predictor for respiratory allergic disease and aeroallergen sensitization, it carried a high specificity but poor sensitivity. Hence, egg allergy in infancy, especially when coexisting with eczema, increases respiratory allergic symptoms and aero-allergen sensitization in early childhood.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10981525&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
IgE antibody to fish gelatin (type I collagen) in patients with fish allergy.

Sakaguchi M, Toda M, Ebihara T, Irie S, Hori H, Imai A, Yanagida M, Miyazawa H, Ohsuna H, Ikezawa Z, Inouye S.

Department of Immunology, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

BACKGROUND: Most children with anaphylaxis to measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines had shown sensitivity to bovine gelatin that was included in the vaccines. Recently, it was found that bovine type I collagen, which is the main content in the gelatin, is a major allergen in bovine gelatin allergy. Fish meat and skin also contain type I collagen. OBJECTIVE: The present study was designed to investigate IgE antibody to fish gelatin in children with fish allergy. METHODS: Serum samples were taken from patients in 3 groups: (1) 10 patients with fish allergy and specific IgE to fish meat; (2) two patients with allergies to both fish meat and bovine gelatin and specific IgE to fish meat and bovine gelatin; and (3) 15 patients with atopic dermatitis and specific IgE to fish meat. Various fish gelatins (type I collagen) were prepared from fish skin. IgE antibody to fish gelatin was analyzed by using ELISA and immunoblotting. RESULTS: Of 10 patients with fish allergy, 3 had specific IgE to fish gelatin. Of two patients with fish allergy and bovine gelatin allergy, all had specific IgE to fish gelatin. Of 15 patients with atopic dermatitis and specific IgE to fish meat, 5 had specific IgE to fish gelatin. Furthermore, IgE from pooled serum of the patients reacted with both the alpha1 and alpha2 chains of fish type I collagen in immunoblots. There is cross-reactivity among gelatins from various fishes, but there is little cross-reactivity between fish and bovine gelatins. CONCLUSION: Some fish-sensitive patients possessed IgE antibody to fish gelatin. Fish gelatin (type I collagen) might be an allergen in subjects with fish allergy.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10984381&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Allergy to plant-derived fresh foods in a birch- and ragweed-free area.

Cuesta-Herranz J, Lazaro M, Figueredo E, Igea JM, Umpierrez A, De-Las-Heras M.

Allergy Department, Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Clinica Alergoasma, Salamanca, Spain.

BACKGROUND: Allergy to plant-derived fresh foods has often been reported in geographical areas where birch or ragweed pollens are frequent and has been attributed to cross-reactivity to pollens. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study has been to evaluate allergy to plant-derived fresh foods among pollen-allergic patients from a birch and ragweed-free area. METHODS: Ninety-five pollen-allergic patients took part in the study. The study consisted of a questionnaire, skin prick tests and challenge tests. Pollen skin tests to five grasses, eight trees and seven weeds were performed in duplicate. Prick tests (prick by prick) and challenge tests were carried out with the fresh foods. RESULTS: Most patients allergic to pollens were sensitized to grass (Lolium and Phleum; 97.9%), followed by tree (Olea; 82.1%) and weed pollens (Plantago; 64.2%). 35 of the 95 pollen-allergic patients had positive skin test responses to some plant-derived fresh foods, the highest percentage corresponding to several fruits in the Rosaceae family (peach and pear, 26.3%), followed by Cucurbitacea fruits (melon, 13.7%). The 21. 05% of the pollen-allergic patients were allergic to some type of plant-derived fresh food. Peach was the plant-derived fresh food which most frequently elicited allergy symptoms (12.6%), followed by melon (7.36%). The cluster of positive responses to Rosaceae fruits was higher for skin testing than for challenge testing. CONCLUSION: Peach was the most important allergy provoking fruit in a birch and ragweed free-area where apples were consumed at a rate of two times more than peaches and the patients allergic to pollen were principally sensitized to grass pollens.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10998017&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Assessment of latex allergy in a healthcare population: are the available tests valid?

Pridgeon C, Wild G, Ashworth F, Egner W, Ward AM.

Department of Immunology, Northern General Hospital, Herries Road, Sheffield, S5 7YT, U.K.

BACKGROUND: Latex allergy can cause serious, preventable work-related health problems in healthcare workers who are a high risk group for this form of allergy. Type I hypersensitivity can produce life-threatening systemic effects, and involves an allergen-specific immunoglobulin (IgE) response to proteins found in latex. The estimated prevalence of latex 'allergy' in healthcare workers varies widely (2.8% - 18%), and studies do not always distinguish between those who are positive in an assay for latex-specific IgE and those with clinical allergy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the performance of four in-vitro methods and three skin testing methods for detecting latex-specific IgE in a group of UK healthcare workers. Test results were compared with reported clinical symptoms defined by questionnaire. METHODS: Skin prick testing was carried out on volunteers using three reagents: (a) stallergenes commercial latex extract (Cedex, France); (b) an in-house latex glove extract; and (c) a fresh glove piece. Specific IgE levels were determined using Pharmacia AutocapTM (Uppsala, Sweden), Pharmacia UnicapTM (Uppsala, Sweden), DPC Immulite(R) (Los Angeles, USA) and Hycor HytecTM (Irvine, California, USA) methods. Each volunteer completed a questionnaire detailing latex exposure and allergic history. RESULTS: In vitro methods for detecting specific IgE to natural rubber latex were positive in 3.6%, to 43.6% of the same population. Skin prick tests positivity varied between 2. 9% and 14.3% with different extracts. From the subjects tested 9.1% reported symptoms which could be consistent with type I allergy, although none had been given a pre-existing diagnosis of latex allergy, and 43.6% of volunteers reported symptoms consistent with type IV hypersensitivity or irritant dermatitis. Contingency tables and chi-squared analysis revealed no correlation between most methods. No correlation was shown between symptoms consistent with type I allergy and any in vitro or skin testing method for latex-specific IgE. CONCLUSIONS: A wide variation between testing procedures was found, and no method could be correlated with reported symptoms of type I allergy. At least one in vitro specific IgE assay produced a high percentage of positive results at variance with the clinical symptoms in volunteers. A clinical history is essential in establishing type I hypersensitivity to latex and test results should not be used in isolation. The incidence of clinical sensitization may be seriously over-estimated if only laboratory parameters are used.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10998022&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine



allergy
Characterization of primary recall in vitro lymphocyte responses to bacampicillin in allergic subjects.

Cederbrant K, Marcusson-Stahl M, Hultman P.

Department of Health and Environment, Division of Molecular and Immunological Pathology, University of Linkoping, Linkoping, Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Antigen-specific cell lines or clones are often used as models of drug-specific allergy. However, cloning procedures are time consuming, and the repeated antigen stimulation cycles as well as the addition of various growth enhancers may affect the in vivo relevance of these systems. OBJECTIVE: Using bacampicillin-allergic subjects, we wanted to investigate the applicability of primary recall in vitro lymphocyte responses to characterize type I and type IV allergy. The sensitivity and specificity of LTT (Lymphocyte transformation test), when used as an in vitro diagnostic tool, were also assessed. METHODS: A total of 39 patients with symptoms of type I (rhinitis) or type IV (allergic contact dermatitis, ACD) allergy following occupational exposure to bacampicillin, were included. Ten individuals without penicillin allergy or occupational exposure to bacampicillin served as controls. All subjects were LTT tested. Four patients with rhinitis and two patients with ACD were available for studying the immunophenotype and the TCR-Vbeta repertoire of bacampicillin induced lymphoblasts as well as the cytokine profiles and expression of the activation markers CD23 and CD134 in primary PBMC cultures. RESULTS: LTT was positive in 87% and at least one of the skin tests was positive in 85% of the patients with allergic symptoms. 69% of the patients with type I allergies were patch test-positive. Results from LTT and skin test correlated in 87% of the cases. The combined sensitivity of LTT and skin tests was 92%. The specificity of LTT was 90% in healthy controls. Bacampicillin induced lymphoblasts were mainly CD4 + in both ACD and rhinitis patients. The TCR-Vbeta profiles of the predominant CD4 + lymphoblasts were heterogeneous with individual skewing towards Vbeta2, Vbeta3, Vbeta5.1 and/or Vbeta14. An increased expression of IFNgamma was detected in bacampicillin treated PBMC cultures from the ACD but not from rhinitis patients. IL-5 was detected in bacampicillin exposed PBMC cultures from all patients but not from healthy controls. This Th2 environment could also be verified by CD23 and CD134 expression. CONCLUSION: LTT and skin tests are equally sensitive in identifying bacampicillin allergic subjects. When the two tests are combined, the sensitivity increases. The patch test is useful not only for detection of type IV but also for the identification of type I allergies. When using primary PBMC cultures, IFNgamma is the most suitable cytokine to discriminate between type I and type IV allergy. IL-5 can possibly be used as a general marker for bacampicillin induced allergy. Thus, primary cell cultures may be considered as an alternative to T-cell lines or clones for the study of drug induced allergy.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10998023&dopt=Abstract allergy medicine









allergy: online references

allergy 1 | allergy 2 | allergy 3 | allergy 4 | allergy 5 | allergy 6 | allergy 7 | allergy 8 | allergy 9 | allergy 10 | allergy 11 | allergy 12 | allergy 13 | allergy 14 | allergy 15 | allergy 16 | allergy 17 | allergy 18 | allergy 19 | allergy 20 | allergy 21 | allergy 22 | allergy 23 | allergy 24 | allergy 25 | allergy 26 | allergy 27 | allergy 28 | allergy 29 | allergy 30 | allergy 31 | allergy 32 | allergy 33 | allergy 34 | allergy 35 | allergy 36 | allergy 37 | allergy 38 | allergy 39 | allergy 40 | allergy 41 | allergy 42 | allergy 43 | allergy 44 | allergy 45 | allergy 46



© DreamPharm.com