pain-relief-18.matches: pain relief
Difference in pain relief after trigger point injections in myofascial pain patients with and without fibromyalgia.

Hong CZ, Hsueh TC.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of California, Irvine, USA.

OBJECTIVE: To compare responses to trigger point (TrP) injection between patients having both myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) caused by active TrPs and fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and patients with MPS due to TrPs but without FMS. DESIGN: Prospective design blinded measurement, before- after trial. SETTING: A pain control medical clinic. PATIENTS: Group 1: MPS + FMS; Group 2: MPS only. All patients (9 in each group) had active TrPs in the upper trapezius muscle. INTERVENTION: Myofascial TrP injection with 0.5% xylocaine. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective pain intensity (PI), pain threshold (PT), and range of motion (ROM) were assessed before, immediately after, and 2 weeks after TrP injection. RESULTS: In a comparison of preinjection measures to immediate postinjection measures, only ROM was significantly improved (p < .05) in Group 1 patients; all three parameters were significantly improved (p < .05) in the Group 2 patients who had only MPS. Two weeks after injection, both groups showed significant improvement (p < .05) in all three measured parameters as compared to preinjection measurements. In a comparison of the two groups, the immediate effectiveness of TrP injection was significantly less (p < .05) in Group 1 than in Group 2 for all three parameters. Two weeks after injection, the degree of improvement in PT or ROM (but not PI) was not significantly different between two groups. Postinjection soreness (different from myofascial pain) was more severe, developed sooner, and lasted longer in Group 1 than in Group 2. CONCLUSION: Trigger point injection is a valuable procedure for pain relief for patients in both group. Patients with FMS are likely to experience significant but delayed and attenuated pain relief following injection of their active TrPs compared to myofascial pain patients with similar TrPs but without FMS. Also, FMS patients are likely to experience significantly more postinjection soreness for a longer period of time.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8931529&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-18.matches: pain relief
Long-Term Outcome of Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis in Women with Chronic Pelvic Pain after Hysterectomy

Nezhat CR, Nezhat FR, Swan AE.

Stanford University Endoscopy Center for Training & Technology, 900 Welch Road, Suite 403, Palo Alto, CA 94304.

The management of severe small and large bowel adhesions in patients suffering from chronic pelvic pain after undergoing hysterectomy remains highly challenging. A cohort of 48 women (median age 41 yrs, range 26-59 yrs) with chronic pelvic pain had severe bowel adhesions. Forty-two had undergone a total abdominal hysterectomy (27 with bilateral, 7 with unilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), five a vaginal hysterectomy (4 with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy), and one a laparoscopic hysterectomy. After laparoscopic adhesiolysis, 23 patients were followed for up to 24 months, 23 for 48 to 60 months, and 2 were lost to follow-up. Three intraoperative complications (6.2%) were one ileus, which required a 2-day hospital admission, one pelvic abscess requiring readmission and second-look laparoscopy, and one episode of urinary retention requiring a 1-day readmission. Of the 23 women followed for more than 24 months, 11 (47.8%) required from one to three subsequent surgeries. Complete pain relief was reported by 10 (43.5%) women, 8 of whom did not require further surgery. Twelve (57.1%) of the 21 patients followed for 6 to 12 months reported complete pain relief. Laparoscopic adhesiolysis achieved complete pain relief in approximately half of the women.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9074193&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-18.matches: pain relief
Predicting surgical outcome for pain relief and return to work.

Hamlin C, Hitchcock M, Hofmeister J, Owens R.

University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, USA.

BACKGROUND: We evaluated a new psychological test (Paindex) for identifying and quantifying psychological factors associated with poor surgical outcome, and predicting the degree of pain relief and return to work. METHOD: This test was administered to 120 randomly selected patients before carpal tunnel and laminectomy surgeries. RESULTS: This test correctly predicted the probability of pain relief and return to work in 46 of the 50 laminectomy patients (92%), and 63 of the 70 carpal tunnel patients (90%). The overall test sensitivity was 86% and the specificity 94%. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that this can be a useful adjunctive test for identifying psychological problems that could have a bearing on the decision to operate and then problems that could occur after surgery, particularly in cases where the extent and degree of pain and disability are judged to be considerably in excess of the objective medical findings.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=9192604&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-19.matches: pain relief
Humeral head replacement for glenohumeral arthritis.

Cofield RH, Frankle MA, Zuckerman JD.

Department of Orthopedics, Mayo Clinic and Foundation, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

From July 1977 through March of 1983, humeral head replacement was performed on 35 shoulders with osteoarthritis and 32 shoulders with rheumatoid arthritis and followed-up for an average of 9.3 years. Satisfactory pain relief was achieved in 44 (66%) and 52 of the shoulders (78%) were described by patients as being much better or better. Active elevation was improved from an average of 84 degrees to an average of 110 degrees with external rotation improving from 20 degrees to 44 degrees. Strength improvement also occurred. Only three complications developed, and these did not affect the final outcome. Because of moderate or severe pain, 12 shoulders (18%) required revision to total shoulder arthroplasty, and all patients were relieved of their pain. The result ratings were excellent in 10 shoulders, satisfactory in 23, and unsatisfactory in 34 (51%). With longer follow-up, a satisfactory level of pain relief may not continue for those patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis who have had humeral head replacement alone. Whereas this form of treatment should certainly be considered in those patients who have inadequate glenoid bone to support a glenoid implant and probably be considered in younger patients or patients who wish to remain more active, these latter patients must be fully appraised that the probability of continuing pain relief is less than has often been appreciated.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10163527&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-19.matches: pain relief
Autologous islet transplantation to prevent diabetes after pancreatic resection.

Wahoff DC, Papalois BE, Najarian JS, Kendall DM, Farney AC, Leone JP, Jessurun J, Dunn DL, Robertson RP, Sutherland DE.

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, USA.

BACKGROUND: Extensive pancreatic resection for small-duct chronic pancreatitis is often required for pain relief, but the risk of diabetes is a major deterrent. OBJECTIVE: Incidence of pain relief, prevention of diabetes, and identification of factors predictive of success were the goals in this series of 48 patients who underwent pancreatectomy and islet autotransplantation for chronic pancreatitis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Of the 48 patients, 43 underwent total or near-total (> 95%) pancreatectomy and 5 underwent partial pancreatectomy. The resected pancreas was dispersed by either old (n = 26) or new (n = 22) methods of collagenase digestion. Islets were injected into the portal vein of 46 of the 48 patients and under the kidney capsule in the remaining 2. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, pain relief, and need for exogenous insulin were determined, and actuarial probability of postoperative insulin independence was calculated based on several variables. RESULTS: One perioperative death occurred. Surgical complications occurred in 12 of the 48 patients (25%): of these, 3 had a total (n = 27); 8, a near-total (n = 16); and 1, a partial pancreatectomy (p = 0.02). Most of the 48 patients had a transient increase in portal venous pressure after islet infusion, but no serious sequelae developed. More than 80% of patients experienced significant pain relief after pancreatectomy. Of the 39 patients who underwent total or near-total pancreatectomy, 20 (51%) were initially insulin independent. Between 2 and 10 years after transplantation, 34% were insulin independent, with no grafts failing after 2 years. The main predictor of insulin independence was the number of islets transplanted (of 14 patients who received > 300,000 islets, 74% were insulin independent at > 2 years after transplantation). In turn, the number of islets recovered correlated with the degree of fibrosis (r = -0.52, p = 0.006) and the dispersion method (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION: Pancreatectomy can relieve intractable pain caused by chronic pancreatitis. Islet autotransplantation is safe and can prevent long-term diabetes in more than 33% of patients and should be an adjunct to any pancreatic resection. A given patient's probability of success can be predicted by the morphologic features of the pancreas.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7574935&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-19.matches: pain relief
[Efficacy of epidural neurolysis]

[Article in Japanese]

Hongo T, Tsunoda K, Egami Y, Ohi Y, Sakamoto A, Inoue T, Ogawa R.

Department of Anesthesiology, Nippon Medical School Chiba-Hokusou Hospital.

Forty-one patients were treated with epidural neurolysis using 50 % ethyl alcohol 2 ml. Thirty eight patients were suffering from cancer pain and three patients were complaining of chronic benign pain. Alcohol block was repeated 2.3 times (mean) in the same patient. Thirty patients were followed after the treatment. Forty-seven percent of the patients reported 70 % or greater pain relief and 20 % of the patients reported about 50 % pain relief. Duration of pain relief was from 9 days to 203 days with a mean duration of 54 days. Adverse effects were reported 43 % of the patients. There is no miserable adverse effect. Adverse effect reported most was pain with epidural injection of drugs after the alcohol block had been performed.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8544293&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-19.matches: pain relief
Orthosis as prognostic instrument in lumbar fusion: no predictive value in 50 cases followed prospectively.

Axelsson P, Johnsson R, Stromqvist B, Nilsson LT, Akesson M.

Department of Orthopedics, Lund University Hospital, Sweden.

To evaluate pain relief in a lumbar orthosis as a predictor for good clinical results after solid fusion, all patients scheduled for such a surgical procedure were preoperatively encouraged to use an orthosis, soft or rigid, for 3 weeks. Grade of back pain relief as a percent using the orthosis was assessed by the patients and was registered before surgery. After surgery, at 1-year follow-up, patients with nonunion demonstrated radiographically were excluded from the series. Thus, 50 patients with solid fusion could be identified and followed for at least 2 years prospectively. At follow-up these 50 patients graded the pain relief induced by the fusion. In the preoperative corset test, 31 patients experienced significant back pain relief, meaning a reduction of at least 50%. No applicable correlation was found, however, between outcome in this corset test and the eventual clinical result expressed as improvement/no improvement after solid fusion. The two types of orthoses did not differ in this aspect. We conclude that the orthosis, rigid or soft, is not a useful instrument when selecting patients for lumbar fusion.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=8547768&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief