pain relief




Arthritis
Genital Warts
Osteoporosis
Pain
Parasites




pain-relief-28.matches: pain relief
A retrospective analysis of neurolytic celiac plexus block for nonpancreatic intra-abdominal cancer pain.

Brown DL.

Department of Anesthesiology, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, WA 98111.

Neurolytic celiac plexus block (NCPB) has been reported to be an effective method for pain relief for a variety of intra-abdominal malignancies, especially pancreatic. In spite of this, few data exist concerning efficacy of the block for pain related to other intraabdominal tumors. The author analyzed the quality of pain relief obtained and complications during the use of NCPB in 66 patients with nonpancreatic intraabdominal malignancies. Seventy-three percent of the patients with nonpancreatic cancer pain had good pain relief, which in 59% of cases lasted through the remaining life of the patients. The incidence of neurologic injury (footdrop) was less than 0.5%. This therapy deserves more widespread use in patients with abdominal pain secondary to a variety of other malignancies, in addition to that of the pancreas.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2487665&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-28.matches: pain relief
Lysine acetyl salicylic acid in acute renal pain.

Youssef HA, Hanafi A.

Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Safat.

The effect of repeated doses of 1.8 g lysine acetyl salicylic acid (LAS) i.v. on severe pain secondary to acute renal colic (ARC) was studied in 45 consecutive patients. Clinically acceptable analgesia was obtained in 65% of the cases. No additional pain relief was achieved with the combination of pethidine 100 mg i.v. + metoclopramide 10 mg, i.m. (narcotics). Pain relief occurred within five minutes in one third of the patients while in the rest within 30 minutes. Significant reduction of systolic blood pressure (mean +/- S.D.) 23.8 +/- 19.5, pulse rate (mean +/- S.D.) 19.5 +/- 10.1 and vomiting were noted in patients who had pain relief. The incidence of nausea has increased after LAS administration. No other side effects were observed. LAS might therefore be applied as a first-hand alternative to narcotics for the treatment of ARC.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2509391&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-28.matches: pain relief
[Pain relief by high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate in advanced prostatic cancer]

[Article in Japanese]

Sasagawa I, Satomi S, Umeda K, Katayama T.

Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Toyama Medical and Pharmaceutical University.

The effect of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate was studied in 7 patients with advanced prostatic cancer. Results in 7 patients were no change (NC) in 5 (71%) and progressive disease (PD) in 2 patients (29%). However, pain relief was obtained in 6 of the 7 patients (86%). As side effects, 2 patients (29%) showed moon-face and 2 patients weight gain (29%). These results indicate that treatment of high-dose medroxyprogesterone acetate is useful for pain relief in patients with advanced prostatic cancer.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2525316&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-28.matches: pain relief
Analgesia with epidural calcitonin in cancer patients.

Miseria S, Torresi U, Piga A, Tummarello D, Belleggia C, Caputi CA, Cellerino R.

Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Ancona, Italy.

We evaluated the analgesic effect of salmon calcitonin (sCT) on 14 patients with intractable cancer pain. The drug was administered by epidural infusion (4-8 bolus administrations in 48 h); the dosage was 100 IU/48 h in 5 patients and 400 IU/48 h in 9 patients. Significant, although limited, pain relief and nocturnal pain relief were obtained; the requirement for conventional analgesic drugs was substantially reduced. The treatment was well tolerated and no side effect was recorded. However, only in 3/14 patients did pain relief result in improvement of mobility, with two patients becoming able to ambulate; no patient experienced absence of pain. In general, the treatment produced only limited benefit and subsequent morphine treatment was required in all instances. Widespread use of epidural sCT in intractable cancer pain is not justified as a routine procedure and more substantial evidence is required to support the clinical utility of such an approach.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2741226&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-11.matches: pain relief
Postoperative pain relief using thoracic epidural analgesia: outstanding success and disappointing failures.

McLeod G, Davies H, Munnoch N, Bannister J, MacRae W.

Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee DD1 9SY, UK.

Six hundred and forty patients received epidural analgesia for postoperative pain relief following major surgery in the 6-year period 1993-1998. Although satisfactory pain relief was achieved in over two-thirds of patients for a median duration of 44 h after surgery, one-fifth of patients (133 individuals) still experienced poor pain relief. Almost one out of three patients (194 individuals) had a problem with their epidural. Eighty-three patients (13%) suffered a technical failure and 84 (13%) patients had their epidurals removed at night time when pain-free because of pressure on beds. Seven patients had their epidural replaced and subsequently experienced excellent pain relief for a median of 77 h. Lack of resources prevented a further 480 patients from receiving the potential benefits of epidural analgesia. These results would suggest that the practical problems of delivering an epidural service far outweigh any differences in drug regimens or modes of delivery of epidural solutions.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=11167441&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-28.matches: pain relief
1988 Volvo award in clinical sciences. Facet joint injection in low-back pain. A prospective statistical study.

Jackson RP, Jacobs RR, Montesano PX.

North Kansas City Hospital, Missouri.

From January 1980 through December 1984, 454 patients were evaluated with facet joint injections. All had the chief complaint of low-back pain, normal neurologic examinations and no root tension signs. Three hundred and ninety completed the protocol, which included a lumbar motion pain assessment before and after facet injection. A total of 127 variables were studied. There were 229 males and 161 females with a median age of 38. Facet joint arthrograms were performed prior to intra-articular injection of local anesthetic and cortisone. Initial mean pain relief was only 29%. Variables correlating significantly (P less than 0.05) with more postinjection pain relief were older age, prior history of low-back pain, normal gait, maximum pain on extension following forward flexion in the standing position, and the absence of leg pain, muscle spasm and aggravation of pain on Valsalva. Greatest pain relief immediately after injection was seen with lumbar extension and rotation, motions reported to stress the facet joints or aggravate pain of facet joint origin. Patients with more pain on lumbar extension and rotation as a group, however, did not get more pain relief. From this study we were not able to identify clinical facet joint syndromes or predict patients responding better to this procedure. The facet joints were not commonly the single or primary source for low-back pain in the great majority (greater than 90%) of patients studied.

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=2974632&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief



pain-relief-28.matches: pain relief
[Caudal anesthesia combined with general anesthesia in comparison with general anesthesia in ambulatory circumcision]

[Article in German]

Grosse G.

Institut fur Anaesthesiologie, Stadtischen Kliniken Osnabruck.

In 100 boys (5.9 +/- 3.2 years old) undergoing outpatient circumcision, analgesia was provided with 0.375% bupivacaine 1 ml/year of age by caudal injection (group I), administered after induction of general anesthesia. This group was compared with 100 boys (6.3 +/- 3.4 years old), who received only general anesthesia (group II). The puncture technique described was free of complications and the caudal blocks were 98% successful. There was a great difference with regard to the levels of general anesthesia: the average enflurane concentrations required to block autonomic reactions during surgical intervention was 1.3 vol% in group I and 2.7 vol% in group II. The amount of pethidine needed for perioperative pain relief was 8 mg (+/- 5.7) in 17/100 of group I and 17.3 mg (+/- 6.8) in 91/100 of group II. In addition, paracetamol was given in 10/100 of group I and 30/100 of group II. The boys in group I showed calm postoperative behavior. In both groups there were only slight differences in hemodynamic parameters. Of the parents who answered our questionnaire (50 answers to 60 questionnaires), 68% were amazed at the duration of analgesia. During the late postoperative period, in group I there was an almost total absence of vomiting (4%), with an associated rapid return to normal feeding. In 83% the effect of late postoperative analgesia worked so well that no subsequent analgesic was given. In 15% the pain relief lasted 6.3 +/- 2.5 h. The excellent postoperative pain relief produced by caudal anesthesia justifies its frequent use for children subjected to genital surgery.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Online source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=3213938&dopt=Abstract pain, pain medicine, pain relief









pain relief References

pain relief 1 | pain relief 2 | pain relief 3 | pain relief 4 | pain relief 5 | pain relief 6 | pain relief 7 | pain relief 8 | pain relief 9 | pain relief 10 | pain relief 11 | pain relief 12 | pain relief 13 | pain relief 14 | pain relief 15 | pain relief 16 | pain relief 17 | pain relief 18 | pain relief 19 | pain relief 20 | pain relief 21 | pain relief 22 | pain relief 23 | pain relief 24 | pain relief 25 | pain relief 26 | pain relief 27 | pain relief 28 | pain relief 29 | pain relief 30 | pain relief 31 | pain relief 32 | pain relief 33 | pain relief 34 | pain relief 35 | pain relief 36 | pain relief 37 | pain relief 38 | pain relief 39 | pain relief 40 | pain relief 41 | pain relief 42 | pain relief 43 | pain relief 44 | pain relief 45 | pain relief 46 | pain relief 47 | pain relief 48 | pain relief 49 | pain relief 50 | pain relief 51 | pain relief 52 | pain relief 53 | pain relief 54 | pain relief 55 | pain relief 56 | pain relief 57 | pain relief 58 | pain relief 59 | pain relief 60 | pain relief 61 | pain relief 62 | pain relief 63 | pain relief 64 | pain relief 65 | pain relief 66 | pain relief 67



© DreamPharm.com