|
J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;63(6):807-13. In vivo release of vancomycin from biodegradable beads.
Liu SJ, Wen-Neng Ueng S, Lin SS, Chan EC.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
The current delivery system of antibiotics for the treatment of osteomyelitis uses polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) beads as a local drug-release agent. The nonbiodegradable nature of the PMMA, however, necessitates a second operation to remove the beads. This article explores the alternative of using biodegradable polymers as antibiotic beads for a long-term drug release in vivo. To manufacture an antibiotic bead, lactide-glycolide copolymers were mixed with vancomycin. The mixture was compressed and sintered at 55 degrees C to form beads 8 mm in diameter. An in vivo animal model was proposed to characterize the elution rate of antibiotic over a 55-day period. Biodegradable beads released high concentrations of antibiotic (well above the breakpoint sensitivity concentration) in vivo for the period of time needed to treat bone infection; that is, 4-6 weeks. A bacterial inhibition test was also carried out to determine the relative activity of the released antibiotics. The diameter of the sample inhibition zone ranged from 8 to 18 mm, which is equivalent to 9.1 to 100% of relative activity. In addition, the antibiotic concentration of systemic blood was found to be very low. Antibiotic-impregnated biodegradable beads may have a potential role in the prevention and management of surgical infections. 2002 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12418028&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
Pharmacotherapy. 1999 Apr;19(4):388-92. Survey of clinical pharmacists' knowledge of appropriateness of antimicrobial therapy for upper respiratory infections and acute bronchitis.
Mainous AG 3rd, MacFarlane LL, Connor MK, Green LA, Fowler K, Hueston WJ.
Department of Family Medicine, and the Center for Health Care Research, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
We conducted a survey to assess clinical pharmacists' recommendation of antibiotics for upper respiratory infections (URIs) and acute bronchitis. A random sample of 752 members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy were mailed a multiple-choice survey that presented four examples consistent with clinical symptoms of the two disorders. Respondents were asked what treatment they would recommend for each example. The response rate was 59%. Pharmacists recommended antibiotics for the treatment of both URIs and acute bronchitis significantly more if patients' symptoms included discolored discharge or sputum as opposed to clear discharge. Those who were board certified were less likely than nonboard-certified pharmacists to recommend antibiotics for URIs with discolored discharge. Pharmacists who specialized in either ambulatory care or infectious disease were less likely than those in other specialties to recommend antibiotics for acute bronchitis with discolored sputum. Clinical pharmacists are similar to patients and physicians in their belief that antibiotics are appropriate for URIs and acute bronchitis with discolored discharge. Considering the role that pharmacists play as clinical consultants to physicians, greater efforts should be made to educate them regarding appropriate prescription of antibiotics.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10212008&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
J Chemother. 2002 Aug;14(4):332-5. Antibiotic use in an Italian university hospital.
Mazzeo F, Capuano A, Motola G, Russo F, Berrino L, Filippelli A, Rossi F.
Department of Experimental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Second University of Naples, Italy. filomena.mazzenina2.it
The aim of this retrospective observational study was to investigate: a) expenditure for antibiotics with respect to the total pharmacy drug budget and to costs of other medical devices; b) the most frequently used antimicrobial classes and molecules; c) the clinical units that most frequently use antimicrobial therapy; d) the preferred route of administration; e) consumption patterns of antibiotics over two periods (January-September 1999 and January-September 2000). The consumption of a single antimicrobial agent was expressed as daily defined doses (DDD) per 100 bed days. In 1999 drugs accounted for 56% of the total costs but decreased to 46% in 2000. Antibiotics accounted for 15% of the pharmacy's overall acquisition costs in 1999 and dropped to 13% in 2000. In both 1999 and 2000, penicillins were used most, followed by cephalosporins and aminoglycosides. In 1999, the most frequently used antibiotic was amoxicillin (4.02 DDD per 100 bed days) followed by ceftazidime, ampicillin, ceftriaxone, and co-amoxiclav. In 2000 ceftriaxone was the most commonly used antibiotic (4.35 DDD per 100 bed days) followed by co-amoxiclav, amoxicillin, ceftazidime. The general surgery, medical therapy and infectious diseases units accounted for the majority of penicillin consumption, while cephalosporins were most widely used in general surgery, orthopedics and neurosurgery units. Parenteral administration was the most widely used route in both years.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12420848&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
Therapie. 2002 May-Jun;57(3):214-28. [Development of surgical antibioprophylaxis kits: evaluation of the impact on prescribing habits]
[Article in French]
Aouizerate P, Guizard M.
Service de Pharmacie-Sterilisation, Centre Hospitalier de Meaux, France. p-aouizerath-meaux.fr
In our hospital, surgical antibioprophylaxis (ATBP) was too often administered too late, thus raising the infectious risk. Antibiotic stocks of the anaesthesia department were also systematically used, instead of nominal prescriptions of these drugs. The pharmacy could neither charge antibiotics to each surgical department nor quantify and differentiate ATBP from curative antibiotic therapy. The pharmacy and anaesthesia departments therefore set out to standardize surgical ATBP, in order to adapt this treatment to each surgical indication, and particularly in the case of allergy to beta-lactamase antibiotics (second line treatment kits). Consequently, prescription forms were developed and supplied to each surgery department, as well as ATBP kits. The kits were prepared and distributed by the pharmacy, and comprised boxes containing antibiotics in sufficient quantities to respect the protocols approved by the French Society of Anaesthesia and Resuscitation (SFAR). A protocol describing prescriptions, dispensation and administration has been presented to physicians and nurses. Fifteen surgical departments were included in our study and 30 different kits were prepared. From 1998 to 2001, 5586 surgical operations required administration of a kit (second line treatment kits in 5% of cases): 1848 (33%) in visceral surgery; 764 (13.8%) in urology; 802 (14%) in orthopaedics; 13 (0.2%) in vascular and thoracic surgery; 1236 (22%) in ear-nose-throat (ENT), periodontics and ophtalmology, and 923 (17%) in gynaecology and obstetrics. 93% of filled prescriptions forms were spontaneously returned to the pharmacy, the others were obtained during the renewal of kit stocks. The cost (over 4 years) of ATBP was quantified: 157,871 F for the 15 departments included, 26,123 F in visceral surgery, 13,520 F in urology, 73,741 F in orthopaedics, 569 F in vascular surgery, 39,720 F in ENT/ophthalmology/periodontics and 4,198 F in gynaecology and obstetrics. According to the Altemeier classification, 2226 class I, 3151 class II, and 209 class III surgical operations were performed. Since the kits have been brought into use, the committee for the protection against nosocomial infections (CLIN) has observed a reduction in the incidence of post-operative infections, according to the Altemeier classification: from 1.6% to 0.5% in class I, from 6.5% to 4.3% in class II, and from 11% to 8.5% in class III. The difference was statistically significant only for classes I (p < 0.01) and II (p < 0.001), and unchanged for class III (p = 0.3). No analysis was carried out for class IV (curative treatments). Both nurses and physicians have greatly appreciated the implementation of this organization. The advantage in terms of post-operative infections, administration exhaustiveness and stock management is obvious. The prescribed kits were systematically appropriate for the surgical interventions. In orthopaedics, cefamandole was used over 24 h (188 kits) in ligament plasty and osteotomy, or for 48 h (499 kits) in prosthetic surgery; 24 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (first line) and 9 clindamycin/gentamicin (second line) single dose kits have been prescribed in traumatic indications. In ophthalmology, kits were only prescribed in endophtalmitis (24 ofloxacin/fosfomycin single amount kits), implant replacement or cornea graft (1076 ofloxacin 24 h kits) and cataract surgery in diabetic patients (12 ofloxacin single amount kits). In ENT and periodontics, 124 surgical operations required cefazolin single dose kits. In vascular surgery, 5 pefloxacin/gentamicin 48 h kits and 1 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid 48 h kit were used in contaminated limb amputation, 1 cefamandole 48 h kit in class I surgery and 1 vancomycin 24 h kit (betalactamase antibiotic allergy); in thoracic surgery, 1 cefamandole 24 h kit was used for a thoracic wound. In visceral surgery, 9 different kits have been used, depending on the opening (class II) or not (class I) of the digestive tract. 797 cefazolin (first line) and 68 clindamycin/gentamicin (second line) single dose kits were used in class I surgery, and 689 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid single dose (SD) kits in class II surgery. Specific protocols consisted of 18 ceftriaxone/metronidazole and 48 metronidazole/gentamicin SD kits in oesophagus surgery, 11 ceftriaxone and 17 gentamicin SD kits in biliary endoscopy, 137 metronidazole SD kits in proctology and 34 amoxicillin/gentamicin 6 h kits for prevention of endocarditis. In urology, 133 cefotaxime and 20 pefloxacin/gentamicin SD kits were precribed in renal lithiasis, 102 amoxicillin/clavulanic acid SD kits in cystectomy, 27 amoxicillin/gentamicin 6 h kits in endocarditis prevention and 58 cefamandole SD kits in all other indications. In gynaecology and obstetrics, 534 cefazoline and 19 clindamycin/gentamicin (second line) SD kits were used, and 370 doxycyclin SD kits were prescribed in pregnancy termination. Some departments (orthopaedics and visceral surgery) adapted the protocols to their needs, specifically with regard to treatment duration. However, these situations were quickly corrected. A constant follow-up and update of this system, associated with routine audits, should allow the maintenance and possibly the improvement of these results, hence shortening treatment duration.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12422531&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2002 Jul 31;114(13-14):616-9. Development of erythema migrans in spite of treatment with antibiotics after a tick bite.
Maraspin V, Lotric-Furlan S, Strle F.
Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. vera.maraspiclj.si
OBJECTIVES: The recent information on the appearance of erythema migrans despite prophylaxis with 200 mg of doxycycline was the stimulus for a search among our patients for those who developed the skin lesion regardless of receiving antibiotics after a tick bite. METHODS: Data were reviewed for adult patients with erythema migrans diagnosed at our institution from 1994 to July 2001, targeting those who received antibiotics after a tick bite. RESULTS: Seven of 5056 (0.14%) patients, diagnosed with typical erythema migrans, developed the skin lesion despite receiving antibiotics after a tick bite. Antibiotics were prescribed by general physicians: in four cases as prophylaxis of Lyme borreliosis within one day after tick detachment and in three cases because of development of acute respiratory tract infection two, five, and eight days after the bite, respectively. The dosages were as follows: azithromycin in a total dose of 3 g in three patients and 1.5 g in the fourth patient, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid 625 mg t.i.d. for ten days in the fifth patient, amoxycillin 500 mg t.i.d. for seven days followed by azithromycin 250 mg o.d. for eight days in the sixth, and amoxycillin 500 mg t.i.d. for eight days in the seventh. The patients (five females and two males, aged 18-61 years) were referred to our Department on average six (1-19) days after the appearance of skin lesions. They had typical solitary (five patients) or multiple (two patients) erythema migrans with the characteristics usually seen in European patients, except for a rather long incubation period (median value 28 days, range 10-40 days). All laboratory tests, including the examination of cerebrospinal fluid in three patients with the disseminated form of the illness, were within normal range. Borrelial antibodies were demonstrated in only one patient. A skin biopsy specimen obtained from the site of the erythema migrans was culture positive for Borrelia in 2/4 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our study did not enable us to assess the frequency of antimicrobial prophylaxis failure or the efficacy of individual antibiotics for the prevention of Lyme borreliosis. However, the seven patients presented demonstrate that antibiotic prophylaxis for Lyme borreliosis after a tick bite, at least in Europe, is not entirely effective.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12422612&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
J Infect. 2002 Nov;45(4):243-5. Antibiotic prophylaxis for dental or urological procedures following hip or knee replacement.
Kingston R, Kiely P, McElwain JP.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Tallaght, Dublin 24, Ireland. rosskofree.indigo.ie
OBJECTIVES: Reports of prosthetic joint infection associated with urological or dental procedures have prompted suggestions that these patients require antibiotic prophylaxis, but no guidelines have been agreed. We have polled orthopaedic surgeons, urologists, and dentists on this issue. METHODS: The questions asked were: could infection of a joint prosthesis result from a dental or urological procedure; does the risk of infection warrant patients informing their dentist or urologist about their joint replacement; should these patients have prophylactic antibiotics for (a) routine procedures and (b) lengthy procedures. RESULTS: Urologists and orthopaedic surgeons agreed that infection could probably result from urological procedures and that patients should definitely inform their urologist about their prosthesis. Orthopaedic surgeons thought that antibiotics were definitely indicated for routine and lengthy urological procedures while urologists thought antibiotics were probably indicated. Orthopaedic surgeons thought that infection probably could result from dental procedures, while dentists answered "don't know". Both groups agreed that patients should definitely inform their dentist about their prosthesis. Orthopaedic surgeons thought that antibiotics probably were necessary for routine and lengthy dental procedures, whereas dentists answered "probably not" and "don't know", respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These results could provide the basis for a consensus regarding prophylactic antibiotic use in this growing patient population.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=12423612&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
CMAJ. 1999 Apr 6;160(7):1013-7. Method of physician remuneration and rates of antibiotic prescription.
Hutchinson JM, Foley RN.
Division of Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's. hcc.hutccsj.nf.ca
BACKGROUND: Rates of antibiotic prescription in Canada far exceed generally accepted rates of bacterial infection, which led the authors to postulate that rates of antibiotic prescription depend to some extent on factors unrelated to medical indication. The associations between antibiotic prescription rates and physician characteristics, in particular, method of remuneration and patient volume, were explored. METHODS: The authors evaluated all 153,047 antibiotic prescriptions generated by 476 Newfoundland general practitioners and paid for by the Newfoundland Drug Plan over the 1-year period ending Aug. 31 1996, and calculated rates of antibiotic prescription. Linear and logistic regression models controlling for several physician characteristics, specifically age, place of education (Canada or elsewhere), location of practice (urban or rural) and proportion of elderly patients seen, were used to analyse rates of antibiotic prescription. RESULTS: Fee-for-service payment (rather than salary) and greater volume of patients were strongly associated with higher antibiotic prescription rates. Fee-for-service physicians were much more likely than their salaried counterparts to prescribe at rates above the median value of 1.51 antibiotic prescriptions per unique patient per year. The association between rate of antibiotic prescription and patient volume (as measured by number of unique patients prescribed to) was evident for all physicians. However, the association was much stronger for fee-for-service physicians. Physicians with higher patient volumes prescribed antibiotics at higher rates. INTERPRETATION: In this study factors other than medical indication, in particular method of physician remuneration and patient volume, played a major role in determining antibiotic prescribing practices.
Source: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10207340&dopt=Abstract antibiotic, antibiotics
Antibiotics Online References
Antibiotics 1 |
Antibiotics 2 |
Antibiotics 3 |
Antibiotics 4 |
Antibiotics 5 |
Antibiotics 6 |
Antibiotics 7 |
Antibiotics 8 |
Antibiotics 9 |
Antibiotics 10 |
Antibiotics 11 |
Antibiotics 12 |
Antibiotics 13 |
Antibiotics 14 |
Antibiotics 15 |
Antibiotics 16 |
Antibiotics 17 |
Antibiotics 18 |
Antibiotics 19 |
Antibiotics 20 |
Antibiotics 21 |
Antibiotics 22 |
Antibiotics 23 |
Antibiotics 24 |
Antibiotics 25 |
Antibiotics 26 |
Antibiotics 27 |
Antibiotics 28 |
Antibiotics 29 |
Antibiotics 30 |
Antibiotics 31 |
Antibiotics 32 |
Antibiotics 33 |
Antibiotics 34 |
Antibiotics 35 |
Antibiotics 36 |
Antibiotics 37 |
Antibiotics 38 |
Antibiotics 39 |
Antibiotics 40 |
Antibiotics 41 |
Antibiotics 42 |
Antibiotics 43 |
Antibiotics 44 |
Antibiotics 45 |
Antibiotics 46 |
Antibiotics 47 |
Antibiotics 48 |
Antibiotics 49
| |